Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Dec 11-13 MW/Lakes/OV Snow Event? Part III


Chicago Storm

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 994
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Indeed :) You know the funny thing is, all these models do something different, yet they all to some extent make sense. Oh to be a NWS forecaster in the Midwest today would be a nightmare.

Yeah, Chicago, MKX, DVN AFD's were all throwing there hands up in the air, This won't be somewhat clear till Tomorrow Night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the moment (11:00 AFD), ILN says nothing no one didn't already know, with a nod to the past though.

THE MAIN FOCUS CONTINUES TO BE ON THE WEEKEND STORM SYSTEM...WHICH

MED RANGE MODELS ARE HAVING A DIFFICULT TIME RESOLVING. AFTER

YESTERDAYS CONSENSUS ON A SOUTHERN TRACK...ALL OPERATIONAL MODELS

AND ENSEMBLE SOLUTIONS TOOK A STRONG SHIFT BACK TO THE NORTH

WITH TODAYS RUNS...SUGGESTING MOSTLY A RAIN MAKER FOR THIS AREA

FOR SATURDAY NIGHT. THESE DRAMATIC SWINGS IN THE MODEL FORECASTS

ILLUSTRATE THE LARGER-THAN-USUAL UNPREDICTABILITY OF THIS SYSTEM.

IN THESE CASES...CHASING MODEL TRENDS IS FUTILE...AS A SYSTEM WITH

SUCH LIMITED PREDICTABILITY COULD EASILY TAKE A SOUTHWARD SHIFT IN

TOMORROWS MODEL RUNS. THUS...WILL CONTINUE TO INDICATE CHANCES OF

BOTH RAIN AND SNOW UNTIL THIS SYSTEM GETS BETTER RESOLVED IN

FUTURE MODEL RUNS. WITH THIS SAID...WOULD NOT BE SURPRISED TO SEE

MODELS SETTLING ON THE MORE NORTHWARD SOLUTION GIVEN

TELECONNECTIONS AND HISTORY OF SIMILAR OCCLUDING SYSTEMS OVER THE

OHIO VALLEY.

A local met just on the news explained both tracks for our area (North versus South) and figures the north to win out, giving us "maybe a bit of snow". It's turning into a civil war version of model runs here.:popcorn:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, Chicago, MKX, DVN AFD's were all throwing there hands up in the air, This won't be somewhat clear till Tomorrow Night.

In fact, this morning's 12z raobs hardly even sniffed the energy that will become this system. Not a single height fall greater than 10 or 20 meters in western Canada. We seem to be converging towards a solution, but there are still many more questions than answers at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In fact, this morning's 12z raobs hardly even sniffed the energy that will become this system. Not a single height fall greater than 10 or 20 meters in western Canada. We seem to be converging towards a solution, but there are still many more questions than answers at this point.

How much can that help? Are you saying the entire vort at h5 in the pacific is just extrapolated by the models right now? I just don't know enough about where they get there data without metars and soundings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the EURO will lay it out on the table... It'll probably show even more snow for me and even less snow for everyone else :0

BowMe better be on his medication...Saukville already has his rubber boots on.

Hey now...I'm only 150 miles west of you! Local mets here are already calling for a possible blizzard this weekend. Kinda gutsy..But both the 12Z NAM and GFS look quite sexy atm. :snowman:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much can that help? Are you saying the entire vort at h5 in the pacific is just extrapolated by the models right now? I just don't know enough about where they get there data without metars and soundings.

In essence the models are always "extrapolating" features. The u/a network is used a correction to reality once the model has initialized. So there has been little, if any, correction applied to the dominant energy (could be higher or lower heights than modeled, stronger or weaker jet, etc.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...