Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Dec 11-13 MW/Lakes/OV Snow Event? Part II


Chicago Storm

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

18z NAM (I'll :weenie: myself here) Looks like it wants to have a more dominant northern 850 as well, real good hit for Southern Minn / Northern Iowa

Yep, was just looking at that. Entire system looks like poop though.

@ 84 hours Really elongated surface pressure... broad 925/850 MB Closed over IN/IL, Open 700, Open 500.

Snow depth through all 84 hours on the NAM

NAM_221_2010120818_F84_SNOWIN_SURFACE.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The latest from Gil Sebenste at NIU:

The new European model is back to taking the low across northern Illinois

Saturday night after crossing Iowa, and then rapidly intensifying over

Michigan. The GFS takes it from Arkansas into Nashville, TN Saturday

night. IMO, both are wrong, and it's a symptom of the utter lack of data

where the system is as to why the models are disagreeing so wildly. And,

of course, they're flip-flopping like a fish out of water. Like I said

yesterday, all I know is that someone here or close by south-east of us

could get very heavy snow, and all of the Great Lakes states should see

high winds on Sunday as the system "bombs out" and pressures fall to 980

millibars, or ~28.90" of mercury. Not the monster storm we saw a month

ago, but with an Arctic high following this, the wind field could be

nearly as strong as with that system to the west of the low track on

Sunday. Temperatures in the lower or middle 30s on Saturday could crash

into the single digits on Sunday as the Arctic air dumps southward behind

the departing system. Wind chills should be well below zero by late Sunday

across the area, possibly approaching or reaching wind chill advisory

levels around -20 degrees. Stay tuned...the system comes onshore

tomorrow...I hope to know more then.

Next week...Arctic high pressure moves over us, and we get the coldest air

of the season. How cold? That -10 is an estimate. If we get an inch of

snow, we may only be 0 to -5. If we get a half foot or more of snow, we

could be -10 to -20 degrees by Tuesday morning. Either way, it's going to

be very cold, with wind chills of 0 to -20...and possibly colder...on

Monday and into Tuesday morning, before we start to slowly moderate in the

middle and latter portion of next week...and our next chance of

significant snow wouldn't be until next weekend.

So, I wish I could be more specific about this weekend, but this system is

so big and complex, and our available resolution of data in the eastern

Pacific is low compared to what we need (and the models need) to properly

analyze the situation. Either way, it's going to be a big system...for

somebody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, the 12z Euro Ensembles are huge.

There's probably going to be an inverted trough over the central plains, given the pronounced lee-side trough that develops and the decent difference between the relatively mild air ahead of the warm front and the arctic air behind the cold front. This is something the Euro perhaps went overboard with for a couple of days, hence the north track. Now it shows more of a classical system with an inverted trough/weak low that opens into a trough as the southern low becomes dominant. These systems tend to cut towards their inverted troughs as they mature, and this is exactly what the Euro and a good chunk of the SREF is showing. The Euro ensembles came in much better agreement with the OP on this run too, so it may be on to something.

Plus, it's the Euro, and it should make anybody uncomfortable to go against it if it has a meteorologically sound solution, given its verification scores and resolution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, the 12z Euro Ensembles are huge.

There's probably going to be an inverted trough over the central plains, given the pronounced lee-side trough that develops and the decent difference between the relatively mild air ahead of the warm front and the arctic air behind the cold front. This is something the Euro perhaps went overboard with for a couple of days, hence the north track. Now it shows more of a classical system with an inverted trough/weak low that opens into a trough as the southern low becomes dominant. These systems tend to cut towards their inverted troughs as they mature, and this is exactly what the Euro and a good chunk of the SREF is showing. The Euro ensembles came in much better agreement with the OP on this run too, so it may be on to something.

Plus, it's the Euro, and it should make anybody uncomfortable to go against it if it has a meteorologically sound solution, given its verification scores and resolution.

The 15z SREF run is hinting at a pretty good area of snowfall dropping down with the mid level energy, associated with that northern 850 low, before the phase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, the 12z Euro Ensembles are huge.

There's probably going to be an inverted trough over the central plains, given the pronounced lee-side trough that develops and the decent difference between the relatively mild air ahead of the warm front and the arctic air behind the cold front. This is something the Euro perhaps went overboard with for a couple of days, hence the north track. Now it shows more of a classical system with an inverted trough/weak low that opens into a trough as the southern low becomes dominant. These systems tend to cut towards their inverted troughs as they mature, and this is exactly what the Euro and a good chunk of the SREF is showing. The Euro ensembles came in much better agreement with the OP on this run too, so it may be on to something.

Plus, it's the Euro, and it should make anybody uncomfortable to go against it if it has a meteorologically sound solution, given its verification scores and resolution.

The OP Euro by 96 hr has a mature cyclone and is closed off at H7, H8, H5..a classic system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is essentially the root cause of why there "always" seems to be a northwest correction to the models. Runaway latent heating (as a result of convection) artificially lower surface pressures in the models. This is why it is so important to look at QPF with respect to upper level forcing. Does it make sense where the model is throwing the QPF bomb?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does the Euro imply for Toronto/Ottawa/Montreal?

Remember that the GFs scored a coup back in mid December 2008 when every other model was showing my area warming up to the mid 40s with rain when we ended up with over a foot of snow

Just going off the freebies it looks like a mix or rain here in Toronto to start going over to snow. You guys up in Ottawa would probably be all snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Areas southeast of Georgian Bay and Lake Huron are going to be crushed v. 2.0.

Is this type of setup more supportive of LES between London and Barrie? You mentioned elsewhere that last weekend's storm was a... oh what was it... 334/500 storm? Which is typically not supportive of LES around this area I think you said?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I gotta laugh....I don't care what anyone says....there is a definite backyard bias amongst NWS offices wrt situations like this. I'm not picking on any single region, I think it's pretty much across the board. Below is a clip from BUF:

IT APPEARS VERY LIKELY THAT A STRONG SURFACE LOW WILL

DEVELOP AS A DEEP AND INCREASINGLY NEGATIVE TILTED UPPER TROF ENTERS

APPROACHES THE EAST COAST. THE PART THE MODELS ARE STRUGGLING WITH

IS IF/WHEN/WHERE A COASTAL LOW WILL DEVELOP. STILL FEEL THAT FROM A

CLIMATOLOGICAL STANDPOINT...A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT IS FAVORED GIVEN

THE FAVORABLE BAROCLINIC ZONE ALONG THE EASTERN SEABOARD. WHILE NOT

TOO MUCH IS READ IN THE SPECIFICS...THE OPERATIONAL GFS APPEARS MUCH

MORE PLAUSIBLE THAN THE EUROPEAN/GGEM...AND IS MUCH MORE IN LINE

WITH OUR GOING FORECAST.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...