Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,859
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Malkir008
    Newest Member
    Malkir008
    Joined

Katia/Lee Banter Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 195
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 9/2/2011 at 6:47 PM, k*** said:

i didn't see anything serious

I guess what I meant was the page and a half or two pages of argument over a ridiculous 1938 comparison that seems to have been misunderstood in the first place. Seemed like we needed a "runoff" thread...

Did you really get 5 posted? I thought you were teflon here...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/2/2011 at 6:50 PM, dryslotted said:

I guess what I meant was the page and a half or two pages of argument over a ridiculous 1938 comparison that seems to have been misunderstood in the first place. Seemed like we needed a "runoff" thread...

Did you really get 5 posted? I thought you were teflon here...

when you're consistently mentioning weenie analogs and low probability events it generally hurts your credibility...this reference is not an isolated incident...this type of stuff has been going on for years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/2/2011 at 7:01 PM, Bostonseminole said:

is funny some of the comments.. don't mention 1938 b/c a poster will flip and believe you b/c you have a red tag.. give me a break. or don't mention 1938 b/c I said so.. it should only be mention if I agree of it..

WTF.. this board is getting ridiculous.

he was wrong about every aspect of that...then he backpeddled to just saying it was a track similarity...which has exactly 0 value

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/2/2011 at 7:03 PM, k*** said:

he was wrong about every aspect of that...then he backpeddled to just saying it was a track similarity...which has exactly 0 value

maybe you are right I did not read the whole thing, but what I see is a consistent badgering of the same posters every time I log in or is the same people arguing about the same stuff, maybe we should be doing something about that. just my two cents, I know I am not in the TC club, but just saying.

Raul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/2/2011 at 7:06 PM, Bostonseminole said:

maybe you are right I did not read the whole thing, but what I see is a consistent badgering of the same posters every time I log in or is the same people arguing about the same stuff, maybe we should be doing something about that. just my two cents, I know I am not in the TC club, but just saying.

Raul

i stopped at you not reading the whole thing...perhaps next time before weighing in you should know what you are talking about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/2/2011 at 6:50 PM, HurricaneJosh said:

I feel like 1938 can be reasonably mentioned when you have a Cat 5 N of the Bahamas with a powerful steering flow pushing it straight N toward the Northeast USA. Otherwise, I don't see why it should be mentioned.

Agreed. All other storms should be compared to Hugo, Katrina, or Andrews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/2/2011 at 7:06 PM, Bostonseminole said:

maybe you are right I did not read the whole thing, but what I see is a consistent badgering of the same posters every time I log in or is the same people arguing about the same stuff, maybe we should be doing something about that. just my two cents, I know I am not in the TC club, but just saying.

Raul

Did you notice it wasn't just Kush, but 3 or 4 pro-mets who were coming down hard on him? It wasn't a troll fest by people in some kind of tropical club, and Chris and Ellinwood are not, as far as I know, considered full time tropical thread posters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/2/2011 at 7:13 PM, Bostonseminole said:

how about not, I can post what I want and free to comment when I want, I don't need to read every single post to understand what goes on.

sure, and i will feel free to point out that reading things help you comment on them more intelligently

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/2/2011 at 7:09 PM, Ed Mahmoud said:

Did you notice it wasn't just Kush, but 3 or 4 pro-mets who were coming down hard on him? It wasn't a troll fest by people in some kind of tropical club, and Chris and Ellinwood are not, as far as I know, considered full time tropical thread posters.

yeah I did notice that, but also my comment is more general in nature, anyway I need to get back to work, you guys mostly do a good job, it just seems that some posters get attacked all the time, like an emotional type of response to them..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/2/2011 at 7:16 PM, Bostonseminole said:

yeah I did notice that, but also my comment is more general in nature, anyway I need to get back to work, you guys mostly do a good job, it just seems that some posters get attacked all the time, like an emotional type of response to them..

or it could be because they constantly are aggressively wrong...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/2/2011 at 7:15 PM, k*** said:

sure, and i will feel free to point out that reading things help you comment on them more intelligently

I can live with that, to be honest I have little time to argue with people, I just wanted to point out what I just did to Ed in my previous post, its a pattern that I see,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...