Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

I have an idea - let's start a new talking points thread


Typhoon Tip

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

NAM is at least 100 miles east of the 18z run, it keeps the trough neutral forever before going negative east of georgia

Typical

pretty much

what's up with that low pressure tracking toward SE mass at hr 84.......

is this depicting a sort of triple point low.....or double redevelopment ( is that even a term)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NAM does argue for a quick mix of sn/ip then a little ice in God's country before cold heavy rain and also a flip to sn at the end of the run, if you extrapolate out.....which is dangerous..lol.

Maine just gets pounded with rain this run, ouch!

The 84 panel does argue for some backside stuff but I don't know how much I trust the NAM, especially considering that the primary looks very strong and very far west initially in its better range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maine just gets pounded with rain this run, ouch!

The 84 panel does argue for some backside stuff but I don't know how much I trust the NAM, especially considering that the primary looks very strong and very far west initially in its better range.

Well I think longitude will be important for any backside stuff. Trying to forecast that right now is impossible, but it's possible if this ULL really digs se and some renegade lobe of vorticity decides to swing out and form a low along the front. Best guess would be eastern NY state, but I'd watch for it in western areas...just don't expect much right now in western mass for now anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that we want to get too carried away, but does the NAM start to introduce a bit more precip in at the end of the loop from south of CC?

Will it be any colder at that point?

Well its the NAM at 84h so take with a grain of salt, but the trough is going extremely negative and is about to be infused with more energy coming through the lakes, so I think we'd definitely see some of that stuff back in from the SE and ESE after it got cold enough for snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well its the NAM at 84h so take with a grain of salt, but the trough is going extremely negative and is about to be infused with more energy coming through the lakes, so I think we'd definitely see some of that stuff back in from the SE and ESE after it got cold enough for snow.

Starting to look like the Euro, the beginning of the SSS trifecta

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats why i luv living in the pine tree state, We have spring year round.......lol

I really feel bad for Maine, I mean last winter was like +10F with a ton of retrograding disasters and this one is starting with a raging Sou'easter and temperatures spiking into the 50s well into Northern Maine. As many have said, it will be colder in the FL Panhandle than CAR while the storm is occurring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really feel bad for Maine, I mean last winter was like +10F with a ton of retrograding disasters and this one is starting with a raging Sou'easter and temperatures spiking into the 50s well into Northern Maine. As many have said, it will be colder in the FL Panhandle than CAR while the storm is occurring.

Why does Maine jackpot on QPF with this system? I would have thought W. NE and E. NY get more precip with this track?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well its the NAM at 84h so take with a grain of salt, but the trough is going extremely negative and is about to be infused with more energy coming through the lakes, so I think we'd definitely see some of that stuff back in from the SE and ESE after it got cold enough for snow.

Extrapolating the NAM beyond 84hr surely sparks the imagination. Just a few observations. At 84hrs, 850mb temps across SNE are only -3 +- a degree or two and dropping quickly. 850 heights are crashing from 78hr to 84hrs, including to the south of new england; There's still a ton of nrg to the south of new england; Oh and the surface low south of new england is taking over. Shades of March 05? I know its the NAM at 84hrs but heck its fun to imagine the possibilites.:popcorn:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really feel bad for Maine, I mean last winter was like +10F with a ton of retrograding disasters and this one is starting with a raging Sou'easter and temperatures spiking into the 50s well into Northern Maine. As many have said, it will be colder in the FL Panhandle than CAR while the storm is occurring.

Yeah we were fooked from Jan on once the that retro storm came thru here and it continues, We can't get 2010 over soon enough.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does Maine jackpot on QPF with this system? I would have thought W. NE and E. NY get more precip with this track?

It might have something to do with the orientation of the LLJ and intense WAA in that area ahead of the system, but I'm not really sure. Definitely a question for a met to answer as most of the runs have shown a rainfall maximum over central Maine with less amounts in all other directions.

Extrapolating the NAM beyond 84hr surely sparks the imagination. Just a few observations. At 84hrs, 850mb temps across SNE are only -3 +- a degree or two and dropping quickly. 850 heights are crashing from 78hr to 84hrs, including to the south of new england; There's still a ton of nrg to the south of new england; Oh and the surface low south of new england is taking over. Shades of March 05? I know its the NAM at 84hrs but heck its fun to imagine the possibilites.:popcorn:

March 2005? People are getting delusional from analyzing this crappy system too much deadhorse.gif

Also, the 850mb 0C line has only made it to NYC after all the precipitation has fallen at the 84 hour mark. It would take a few more hours for the cold air to work into SNE due to the strong WAA and maritime influence during the storm, and the NAM shows that banding is rapidly moving east on the simulated radar reflectivity. This map doesn't really look great to me:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...