Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,598
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    PublicWorks143
    Newest Member
    PublicWorks143
    Joined

0z models


tombo82685

Recommended Posts

I strongly agree with this..and at the H5 level it's very impressive as well. That can even be said for the frames prior to 180 hours, which is good news as we seem to be headed in the right direction on most modeling. This is a classic Miller B shortwave depiction. One just has to hope the confluence in the Northeast is as transient as the GFS and most models have been depicting it to be. If this shortwave does come to fruition, as modeled, the likelihood for a rapidly redeveloping Miller B would increase dramatically.

i love reading your juicy model analysis lol :thumbsup:

--so its a true miller B? looks like it taps into the gulf, the 500mb and 200mb dig to china... :popcorn:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Regarding the first storm system, it's very hard to get frozen precipitation in this area in that set up unless the timing is perfect, or more importantly it is later in the season with a well established cold airmass (which we do not have). This run of the GFS is better positioned with the H5 trough, but the fact remains that the surface low i well to our northwest...the high is to the east, and the low level winds are out of the southwest..which helps develop a warm nose and decreases the frozen precipitation chances. The posters saying it was 34-36 and would be snow would normally be correct, but the warm nose is actually a bit more "wide"on soundings than usual do to the surface low positioning..the H85 low is also well to our northwest of the Great Lakes which creates an unfavorable flow even at that layer.

yup, totally agree, which is why you need the low further south or weaker like the 18z gfs was showing. Weaker storm = weaker southerly winds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like there's a low playing the role of the 50/50 even though it's not at 50/50 lol. Hopefully that low is in place especially initially in order to prevent our coastal from cutting too close to the coast. As usual it's a wait and see game. I'm just glad that the initial low is on the map from day 7 so that it can be tracked from days ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, much colder storm than before. With -10 850s and the low track, looks frozen. I wonder if it gets too much closer if we will have lots of issues..

The biggest issue first is where the storm will eventually track. Then we have to worry about the 540 in the cities. But if the system is strong as the 18z run showed (968mb) even the cities will get snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding the first storm system, it's very hard to get frozen precipitation in this area in that set up unless the timing is perfect, or more importantly it is later in the season with a well established cold airmass (which we do not have). This run of the GFS is better positioned with the H5 trough, but the fact remains that the surface low i well to our northwest...the high is to the east, and the low level winds are out of the southwest..which helps develop a warm nose and decreases the frozen precipitation chances. The posters saying it was 34-36 and would be snow would normally be correct, but the warm nose is actually a bit more "wide"on soundings than usual do to the surface low positioning..the H85 low is also well to our northwest of the Great Lakes which creates an unfavorable flow even at that layer.

Yeah, thats a rain event...take a look at the below event (which we discussed here in depth about 4 weeks ago after Andrew or someone else mentioned it) from 1989......the 850s are way below 0 but both LGA/JFK got up into the 40s during the event at the surface...

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/NARR/1989/us1216.php

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would definitely be snow in the elevated NW suburbs where I live, but probably not for downtown Manhattan.

It would probably be snow in the Bronx....those types of setups will generally be snow barely inland....see 12/9/95 and 12/9/05 as the best examples...both little if any snow fell at JFK but significant snow occurred at EWR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GGEM looks pretty late with the re-development of the initial low. 992 mb hugging the coast probably would not be conducive to snow in the NYC Metro.

It is the 192 hr GGEM though, so probably better to note that it actually has the system that the GFS and Euro have shown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GGEM looks pretty late with the re-development of the initial low. 992 mb hugging the coast probably would not be conducive to snow in the NYC Metro.

It is the 192 hr GGEM though, so probably better to note that it actually has the system that the GFS and Euro have shown.

Thats my thoughts as well. We have near unanimous support on guidance for a storm in the dec 12 - dec 14 time frame now all we need are the details to fall in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GGEM looks pretty late with the re-development of the initial low. 992 mb hugging the coast probably would not be conducive to snow in the NYC Metro.

It is the 192 hr GGEM though, so probably better to note that it actually has the system that the GFS and Euro have shown.

100% agree, the fact that it has the storm is great in my eyes. And it seems like it has a similar upper air pattern as the gfs, just phases everything too late. Gonna be a fun week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its just a point and click but they only have certain locations...there are plenty of sites that have skew t's like plymouth...this skew-t is from twisterdata.com

Tombo, are you here? If you are doing the euro play by play, is it in this thread or are you creating a 0Z euro thread?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% agree, the fact that it has the storm is great in my eyes. And it seems like it has a similar upper air pattern as the gfs, just phases everything too late. Gonna be a fun week.

It took about 2 weeks to finally get the semi western ridge-eastern trough pattern the models kept failing on...perhaps it will take the same with the storm, they failed on 12/8, may also be failing on 12/11...perhaps the third attempt will strike gold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...