Stash Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 Not that this is the least bit scientific, but with many storms that are near misses for us in ENY, we usually at least get at least one NAM run (even if its a rogue 18z off-hour run) which shows a more wound up storm/ decent hit for us...with even the NAM not being able to give us false hope, I haven't paid much attention yet. Winter's still young however, we'll get one up this way. Decent shift west with this morning's 12z NAM, so ENE may get something decent out of this yet. Edit: 12z NAM seems to have a rather broad area of lighter snows even back this way. A definite shift west for the GFS at 00z .. just enough to tease ALB and leave us dry once again so i'd say this looks about right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WNYLakeEffect Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 It looks to be a mess New Years weekend. Not great for travelling! GFS has been incredibly consistent for the past week with regard to some kind of storm that weekend! And both the Euro and GFS are bringing in varying degrees of cold air afterward. 0z GFS's track (up to James Bay) would have any lake effect at least start in Buffalo and possibly stay there. The Euro's different, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Organizing Low Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 The earlier runs of the NAM, GEM, GFS, and Euro had this going out to sea. But you're right, The 00z GFS shows it a little more to the west. which brings 5-12 inches for areas on the coast. we will see what the EURO has to say about this trend. My model of choice 48-24 hours out is the NAM. So, I will wait until tomorrows models run before I know where this thing will most likely go. The models did show me something I liked, The blocking in Canada looks to break down during the first week of Jan with a possible block setting up closer to Greenland...If we want storms in the Northeast this is a very good thing. yes i agree, i think this storm this wekeend is flushing the pattern and once we get past the huge cutter next week, it should reestablish a new pattern.... looks likely we will transition into a more favorable only slightly negative NAO regime which with a mod nina is a good thing in these parts. we want at least some neg AO, just not the extreme we have been getting.....of course the lake effect folks have made out fine. but i think we are about to see a break AT LAST in the pattern.....fingers crossed for those wanting to see some synoptic action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyace Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 That is some good news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Point, NY Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 I wouldn't be writing this storm off in ENY quite yet....................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wx4cast Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 I wouldn't be writing this storm off in ENY quite yet....................... GFS is much farther west but NAM is still east of the BM. Looking at UKie now..... SREFS are nudging a bit west too but as far as this product is concerned we are still not in its "wheelhouse" time frame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FEFD17 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 I have crazy question.When is the last time a storm was written off by a majority of people(models,mets,amateur forecasters) and it came back to bite them?? Sort of how West Mtn says not to be so quick to write it off---yet.. Just curious is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Organizing Low Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 dramatic shift on the GFS ensemble takes the low just SE of cape cod it looks to me ENY to near the international border defintely would be under the gun for at least *some* accumulating snow apparently rumors of initialization errors in the other threads though proceed with caution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayuud Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 And both the Euro and GFS are bringing in varying degrees of cold air afterward. 0z GFS's track (up to James Bay) would have any lake effect at least start in Buffalo and possibly stay there. The Euro's different, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CNYWeather Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 I have crazy question.When is the last time a storm was written off by a majority of people(models,mets,amateur forecasters) and it came back to bite them?? Sort of how West Mtn says not to be so quick to write it off---yet.. Just curious is all. That was happened in I think 2002 on Christmas Day? Something like 3-6" here and we got over 2 feet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ENYsnow Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 GFS is much farther west but NAM is still east of the BM. Looking at UKie now..... SREFS are nudging a bit west too but as far as this product is concerned we are still not in its "wheelhouse" time frame. If the EC comes in like the GFS then we may have something otherwise the GFS is probably just teasing us with its init errors lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan11 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 GFS ensembles went way west.... People on the SNE thread are saying there could have been some initialization error in the Dakotas area, but that shouldn't have such an affect on the ensembles I didn't think. GFS is much farther west but NAM is still east of the BM. Looking at UKie now..... SREFS are nudging a bit west too but as far as this product is concerned we are still not in its "wheelhouse" time frame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan11 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 Well we are still in the 60-84 hour time frame. Such a shift could still occur. If we were inside 48 hours the models tend to have a pretty good clue. Although there are always crazy examples. I have crazy question.When is the last time a storm was written off by a majority of people(models,mets,amateur forecasters) and it came back to bite them?? Sort of how West Mtn says not to be so quick to write it off---yet.. Just curious is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Point, NY Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 <br />GFS is much farther west but NAM is still east of the BM. Looking at UKie now.....<br /><br />SREFS are nudging a bit west too but as far as this product is concerned we are still not in its "wheelhouse" time frame.<br />Seems like todays theme is more energy diving in on the northern branch and a slight, albeit important sharpening of the trof. A promising trend at this time frame. Even better, lets discount all the American and European models and run with the JMA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfie09 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 18z NAM precip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WNYLakeEffect Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 18z NAM precip BUF seems to be largely disregarding the past few runs of the NAM. They only have 20-40% pops with accums less than an inch. The NAM would have 5 or 6" on the Chautauqua Ridge with good enough ratios. Even more would fall near ROC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfie09 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 GFS ensembles went way west.... People on the SNE thread are saying there could have been some initialization error in the Dakotas area, but that shouldn't have such an affect on the ensembles I didn't think. Albany thinks so THROUGH EXTENSIVE COLLABORATION WITH NEIGHBORING OFFICES ANDHPC...THE 12Z GFS WAS DISCOUNTED. THE MODEL DID NOT INITIALIZE WELL WITH ERRORS IN THE HEIGHT FIELD OVER NE AND NORTH CENTRAL CANADA. ERRORS APPEAR TO BE LESS WITH THE 12Z NAM/GGEM/ECMWF/UKMET. THE GFS AMPLIFIES THESE ERRORS...ALONG WITH WHAT SEEMS TO BE INCREASED CONVECTIVE FEEDBACK...FOR RAPID DEEPENING OF THE EAST COAST CYCLOGENESIS SUN-MON AND VERY CLOSE TO THE SHORELINE /IN OTHER WORDS...A MAJOR STORM FOR THE FORECAST AREA/. THIS TOO APPEARS TO HAVE IMPACTED ITS ENSEMBLE MEMBERS WITH ASSOCIATED PERTURBATIONS OFF THESE ERRORS http://forecast.weather.gov/product.php?site=NWS&issuedby=ALY&product=AFD&format=CI&version=1&glossary=1&highlight=on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wx4cast Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 Albany thinks so http://forecast.weat...=1&highlight=on It would affect the ensembles. Still while there is hope the way to go on this storm is to keep continuity with the model ensemble mean(s). EC ensembles are hires GFS' aren't. 00z/12z runs will tell the tale tonight, ep the 12z runs. Tornado Girl can't wait for the 12z NAM tomorrow she says that that is the run that will tell a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FEFD17 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 I moved my snowplow just so I could have an easier time hooking it up and disconnecting it. I got it out and serviced it so it would be ready rather than need it and have it need something. My next door neighbor comes out his door, and after our Christmas greeting he says to put the plow away he just watched a "local" tv station forecast,and the met says this storm is out to sea and it's a wide miss for us and it will be staying in Cape Cod,New Jersey.I was surprised this far out and with any shifting still going on that it was already called a miss.I am just watching stuff and if it misses it misses but wow it just seems premature to broadcast that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Organizing Low Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 the 18z NAM wipes out eastern Mass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Point, NY Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 The thing that sucks about this storm is even if the 18z GFS/NAM verify with the closer to the coast tracks, the low looks like it gets captured just far enough South that warning criteria snows don't make it North or West of Albany. Still time to adjust further North (or South, East & West) though..................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfie09 Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Atleast we have some hope http://raleighwx.americanwx.com/models/gfsensemble/members/18zf066.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Point, NY Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 0z GFS says .........Game on for everyone on a line from Harrisburg to Glens Falls and all points east. We just need this baby to creep a little bit more North before it gets captured and stalls. Instead of just south of L.I. we need it to push up into S. CT. and the whole HV would get hammered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FEFD17 Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Are you serious?? That would be a huge turn of events from the previous thinking.....I admit to being very very hesitant with the current pattern and only one model( so far) but I am least feeling much more optimistic!! MERRY CHRISTMAS !!!!!! To EVERYONE!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan11 Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Taken verbatim the GFS is a major snowstorm just about up to the ALB (tri-cities) area and especially the HV and Catskills. Very sharp drop off northwest of there to a few inches from the central MV to Lake George or so. I have my doubts it gets much further north because the low stacks and has to begin to bend (or jumps to triple point) to the ENE. I suppose we could edge it just a bit more north, or it could slip a bit south and leave ALB with the few inches. I understand the UKMET has trended way west - but haven't seen the maps. RGEM certainly went way west. Are you serious?? That would be a huge turn of events from the previous thinking.....I admit to being very very hesitant with the current pattern and only one model( so far) but I am least feeling much more optimistic!! MERRY CHRISTMAS !!!!!! To EVERYONE!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfie09 Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 0Z GEFS http://raleighwx.americanwx.com/models/gfsensemble/00zgfsensemblep12048.gif http://raleighwx.americanwx.com/models/gfsensemble/00zgfsensemblep12060.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CNYWxGuy Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Taken verbatim the GFS is a major snowstorm just about up to the ALB (tri-cities) area and especially the HV and Catskills. Very sharp drop off northwest of there to a few inches from the central MV to Lake George or so. I have my doubts it gets much further north because the low stacks and has to begin to bend (or jumps to triple point) to the ENE. I suppose we could edge it just a bit more north, or it could slip a bit south and leave ALB with the few inches. I understand the UKMET has trended way west - but haven't seen the maps. RGEM certainly went way west. 0z GEFS Mean is very close to 12 / 18z runs... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FEFD17 Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Crossing my fingers for a decent 4-6" (would love more but I will take what I can get and be happy) for the Glens Falls area!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan11 Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Even a bit more generous northwest of the CD ... .5" line roughly where the operational run had the .25" line. 0z GEFS Mean is very close to 12 / 18z runs... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Point, NY Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Crossing my fingers for a decent 4-6" (would love more but I will take what I can get and be happy) for the Glens Falls area!! If the precip on that map just above verifies, you will be plowing a 4-8" amount (more the further SE you go). While its still a big if, it is not nearly as big as it was 12 hrs. ago. And while I agree with Rick (Logan) that it will bend after a point after capture, it's been such a dramatic shift that it is not such a long shot for it to squeeze another 25-50 miles north or NW from tonights scenarios. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.