Stormlover74 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 I believe when EWR hit 106 103 last July they also hit 100 by 11am or noon and then the rate slowed. With these high dew points there's often a mid-day slow down in the rate of temperature climb...but eventually they will get 105-106 I think..probably 3pm. Today will definitely be a historical day at Newark as they are moving towards their all time record high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wxoutlooksblog Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 I've been predicting 103 for the high temp for Central Park this afternoon and I believe they're well on their way and that number may at this point be conservative. It is already 93 as of 10am at the park. While my 103 may end up being correct, the park could actually go higher than that and it is not so far fetched to think that they could come close to or reach the all-time record of 106. It feels strange to say that, but it's not completely out of reach. WX/PT NAM is now jumping on the idea of some convection in the area this afternoon and tomorrow. If it is correct, it could hold highs at Central Park down to 103 today and 100 tomorrow. Let's hope it's wrong! WX/PT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersWx92 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 I get mine from this utility... http://www.atmos.alb...ther/quick.html type in the station.. select the second check box down and click get data..... unless the decoding is not being done completely accurately.. I've using this utility for a very long time. Hmm something seems off with that. It also says that the 10 am observation at Somerville airport is 93 when NOAA says it's 94: http://forecast.weather.gov/obslocal.php?warnzone=NJZ106&local_place=Newark+International+Airport+NJ&zoneid=EDT&offset=14400 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike2010 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Imagine we get another revision downwards at Newark like last year? Lol lol...good point. We'll know somethings up if the 10:50am reading comes back as 95 or something crazy.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 NAM is now jumping on the idea of some convection in the area this afternoon and tomorrow. If it is correct, it could hold highs at Central Park down to 103 today and 100 tomorrow. Let's hope it's wrong! WX/PT Especially tomorrow afternoon. But it appears it brings it around 18z. 21z: 0z: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LocoAko Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Hmm something seems off with that. It also says that the 10 am observation at Somerville airport is 93 when NOAA says it's 94: http://forecast.weat...DT&offset=14400 It is taking the whole-degree reading from the METAR instead of the more-precise tenth of a degree reading included in the "T" remarks. Its automated and since the T's aren't always included its just reading that. 2011/07/22 13:53 KSMQ 221353Z AUTO 34005KT 8SM CLR 34/23 A2984 RMK AO2 SLP101 T03440233 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike2010 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 NAM is now jumping on the idea of some convection in the area this afternoon and tomorrow. If it is correct, it could hold highs at Central Park down to 103 today and 100 tomorrow. Let's hope it's wrong! WX/PT on the NAM, it's looking more 3 or 4pm 'ish though...after most of the heating is over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tornadojay Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 LOL I was just remembering that lol yea... and the GFS is having initialization problems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Just rose 2 degrees to 95 degrees. On the way to the century mark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 lol yea... and the GFS is having initialization problems Yup, always something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike2010 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 feels like their already recalibrating EWR as we speak.... to prevent global warming outrage.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorEaster27 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 This is crazy, 98/77 HI of 116 where is ALEX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wxnyc Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Obviously a read error its 87 in my area im 15 miles away same elevation Monticello Automatic Weather Observing / Reporting 10:15 Fair 131 73 17 W 6 29.95 http://forecast.weather.gov/obslocal.php?warnzone=NYZ062&local_place=Monticello+NY&zoneid=EDT&offset=14400 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LocoAko Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 feels like their already recalibrating EWR as we speak.... to prevent global warming outrage.. Why do you say that? .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Up to 96.6 at work in Bayside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rtd208 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Up to 95, DP 75, HI 106. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike2010 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Why do you say that? .. Because they did it last year.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathermedic Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 96.5 at 10:30 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LocoAko Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Because they did it last year.. Enjoy your conspiracies.... back to today... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted July 22, 2011 Author Share Posted July 22, 2011 95 degrees here in Long Beach now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Analog96 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Enjoy your conspiracies.... back to today... Do you really believe EWR was 103, while Harrison and Elizabeth (equidistant in opposite directions) were 106, and New Providence, at 300 feet in elevation was 104? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LocoAko Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Do you really believe EWR was 103, while Harrison and Elizabeth (equidistant in opposite directions) were 106, and New Providence, at 300 feet in elevation was 104? I don't know, but I think it is more than a bit presumptuous and irresponsible to assume that the FAA/NWS has an organized goal of scheming and editing observations as they deem fit to try to prove/disprove global warming. I can't say if lowering it was the right thing to do or not but I have no doubt it wasn't to try to hide global warming from anyone. Give them a bit more credit... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psv88 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 last post of the day...newark at 100. http://www.weather.com/weather/today/Newark+NJ+USNJ0355 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 I believe when EWR hit 106 103 last July they also hit 100 by 11am or noon and then the rate slowed. Correct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Is weather.com accurate? They are showing Newark Liberty airport at 100 degrees. Did not know that the official stations reported in between hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Analog96 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Is weather.com accurate? They are showing Newark Liberty airport at 100. Did not know that the official stations reported in between hours. Weatherunderground has it too, I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundog Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Correct Which would mean in all likelihood we should be ahead of the 2010 reading by noon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 I don't know, but I think it is more than a bit presumptuous and irresponsible to assume that the FAA/NWS has an organized goal of scheming and editing observations as they deem fit to try to prove/disprove global warming. I can't say if lowering it was the right thing to do or not but I have no doubt it wasn't to try to hide global warming from anyone. Give them a bit more credit... Always found it a bit suspicious and weird...but I agree that the global warming argument shouldn't be brought into this. The one thing I never understood was why they re-calibrated it down so many degrees. If the thermometer hit 106 or whatever it hit, how can they suddenly say it's a sensor problem and correct it down so low? I guess I never got it...but I will be sure to say that I have not taken the time to investigate the situation--so I am not blaming anyone nor do I have a strong opinion on the whole thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Weatherunderground has it too, I believe. Dont think so. Wunderground shows last update at 9:51am. Its showing 99; Has the same celcius conversion as earthlight's iphone app., I guess: http://www.wundergro...cast?query=kewr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTrials Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Man, those poor workers out on the tarmack with their earmuffs and glow sticks, that has got to suck, especially when the engines move right in front of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.