Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

May 2011 NYC metro area obs./discussion


Snowlover11

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 962
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Regarding the severe threat next week, I know it's early in the game, but I'm actually pretty impressed with the signal, and I'm not excited too often for T-storm threats in the Northeast.

However, here's a map Nate (zucker) posted last night of an infamous outbreak in the NE:

20h2ec0.jpg

Note the deep low tracking through southern Quebec and the associated pressure falls.

Below is the D7 12Z GFS valid Wednesday afternoon:

gfs_pcp_156s.gif

You have a fairly similar set-up -- deep low to the north of Maine and trailing strong cold front. Looks like an intense thermal gradient as well, 850s of +5 to 10c behind the front with high temps in the 60s/70s. We'll probably be soupy and around 90/70 mid next week.

Again, it's just somehting to monitor at this stage, but what we see progged for mid next week is certainly favorable for strong convection in the Northeast. Sfc lows of 1004-1008mb or stronger coupled with the antecedent airmass having 65-70F TD's and 85-90 ambient temps are among the signals you'd like to see. This low is well under 1000mb, quite powerful for the beginning of June, but we'll see if that remains consistent. Also note the position of the upper ridge and wind flow pattern -- marine layer should not be a major factor atm w/ this threat as SWLY winds are present.

That is good news I hope the trend keeps it that way and nothing goes wrong that day because one worry could be the cape not be broken like what happen on Tuesday that why most of the area got screwed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay does the amount of cape really dictate how severe storms that develop are in the area?

Cape indicates the convective available potential energy and is a function of the instability of the atmosphere. The severity of the storms can depend on a number of things including the degree of shear (for updraft organization), the amount of moisture, the type of cape (surface, mixed layer, elevated), and the amout of forcing/ascent. So I guess the answer would be no--it's not a direct tool to determine the severity of storms that develop. In fact, you can have CAPE over 6000 and have a thermo cap--and have not one single storm develop at all. Convection is really an incredibly fragile process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok so now I'm going to get very dissapointed if we end up with nothing over north Jersey, looks like a possible supercell. I don't expect that, but it would be nice to get anything at this point. :lightning:

cref_t3sfc_f07.png

The next couple days is the ultimate tease scenario, intense convection firing all around me and dying out once it reaches the NJ border. I'm not getting my hopes up, especially with strong ridging and a surface southerly wind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cape indicates the convective available potential energy and is a function of the instability of the atmosphere. The severity of the storms can depend on a number of things including the degree of shear (for updraft organization), the amount of moisture, the type of cape (surface, mixed layer, elevated), and the amout of forcing/ascent. So I guess the answer would be no--it's not a direct tool to determine the severity of storms that develop. In fact, you can have CAPE over 6000 and have a thermo cap--and have not one single storm develop at all. Convection is really an incredibly fragile process.

Especially in this area of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

88 here. +14 departure. Awesome!

Was just about to post, that low level boundary is situated right over KEWR. To the west we've got temps near 90F this afternoon -- KSMQ: 88F, KTTN: 88F, KPHL: 88F. Caldwell and Teterboro are in the low-mid 80s.

85.1/71 right now in Monmouth County. To my east there's 60s on the immediate coast. Great summer day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The next couple days is the ultimate tease scenario, intense convection firing all around me and dying out once it reaches the NJ border. I'm not getting my hopes up, especially with strong ridging and a surface southerly wind.

I'm not expecting much to reach the NYC area until Wed. Most of this of will stay well N&W of NYC, because of the ridging aloft and no triggers close enough..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cape indicates the convective available potential energy and is a function of the instability of the atmosphere. The severity of the storms can depend on a number of things including the degree of shear (for updraft organization), the amount of moisture, the type of cape (surface, mixed layer, elevated), and the amout of forcing/ascent. So I guess the answer would be no--it's not a direct tool to determine the severity of storms that develop. In fact, you can have CAPE over 6000 and have a thermo cap--and have not one single storm develop at all. Convection is really an incredibly fragile process.

Thanks earthlight been hearing a lot about it lately and wanted to really find out what kind of correlation to the development of severe storms it has

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was just about to post, that low level boundary is situated right over KEWR. To the west we've got temps near 90F this afternoon -- KSMQ: 88F, KTTN: 88F, KPHL: 88F. Caldwell and Teterboro are in the low-mid 80s.

85.1/71 right now in Monmouth County. To my east there's 60s on the immediate coast. Great summer day.

It's good being on the warm side of the boundary, isn't it? Tomorrow is going to be another warm one, but I am really excited for next week. Should be awesome with 90s and them a very nice synoptic setup for organized convection bring advertised later in the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...