Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Severe Weather Threat May 7th - 13th


Recommended Posts

Note the cells now beginning to flourish under the spreading anvils as longwave radiational cooling begins over the anvil tops and the LLJ starts to kick in. If we continue to get development underneath this area, we may see the development of a decent cold pool and thus an MCS.

Do you think that MCS, if it happens, would move SE? The models were in good agreement with an MCS moving across the UP, so that may be what you are looking at developing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 622
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Concerning tomorrow's potential...

The 0z NAM has development from S. Nebraska down into S. Texas between 15-18z.

Definitely noticed that, and it only makes an already-complex situation that much harder to pin down. The early convection appears to be several counties out ahead of the DL, and is something SPC has mentioned in their outlooks since yesterday.

It seems possible that this activity will develop far enough E and move out early enough not to hinder later development immediately along the DL. But if it does linger too long and/or develops too far W, then it could be trouble.

Overall, I'm becoming a bit less skeptical of tomorrow's potential, as the short-term trends are pointing toward a slightly broader and less sharp/pinched H5 trough evolution. This should keep things a bit less meridional and minimize upper-tropospheric backing with height, at least S of the OK-KS border. Given that (a) early convection does not mess things up too badly, and (B) low-level moisture does not mix out too much due to early veering of low-level winds and the drought conditions, I think there's moderate to substantial tornado potential in the DUC-JWG-PTT corridor in the early evening timeframe.

In general, low-level shear improves with northward extent while deep-layer directional shear improves with southward extent, so it will be quite interesting (and nerve-wracking for chasers) to see which wins out. I like the OK section of the DL best right now, but the low-level hodograph size in C and NW KS is fairly jaw-dropping. Things will definitely get somewhat messy, regardless, given the deeply meridional winds and storm motions only ~45° off the boundary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smh at tomorrow in general.

Toughest forecast in my life, especially considering me chasing is conditional on the fact that track practice gets canceled so I have to guage whether that will happen, then pull the trigger after my calc final to head out to PTT.

Whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm quite interested on how tomorrow plays out, the NAM is all over the place. Only place that really shows good potential is the Greensburg-Pratt, KS area at 24Z. Guess will have to wait to see how the RUC has it in a few hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm quite interested on how tomorrow plays out, the NAM is all over the place. Only place that really shows good potential is the Greensburg-Pratt, KS area at 24Z. Guess will have to wait to see how the RUC has it in a few hours.

24Z FTW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like what the GFS does with crapvection, pretty much eliminating it from being too big of an issue however its lower level wind fields in SC KS are not as good as one would ahve hoped after seeing the 0z NAM run in.

It also moves the dryline a tad bit further east which is fine with me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THE MAIN UNCERTAINTY WITH THE FORECAST IS STORM COVERAGE. MOST OF

THE MODELS KEEP CONVECTIVE COVERAGE ACROSS WRN OK AND WRN KS

RELATIVELY ISOLATED. THIS IS PROBABLY DUE TO THE UPPER-LEVEL LOW

WHICH IS FORECAST TO SLOW DOWN CONSIDERABLY...KEEPING MOST OF THE

LARGE-SCALE ASCENT WEST OF THE DRYLINE. AT THIS POINT...THE NAM

SOLUTION AT 00Z APPEARS REASONABLE SUGGESTING THE STORMS MAY TEND TO

REMAIN WIDELY GAPPED. IN SPITE OF THIS...THE SYNOPTIC PATTERN WITH A

STRONG LOW-LEVEL JET RESPONSE...EJECTING MID-LEVEL JET AND

WELL-DEVELOPED DRYLINE SHOULD RESULT IN A HIGHER-END SEVERE THREAT.

FOR THIS REASON...WILL MAINTAIN A MODERATE RISK ACROSS WCNTRL KS AND

WRN OK.

part of day 1 text

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SPC has put most of NE/N IL in the Slight Risk, with the exception of the SE counties.

Looking at the Meso Analysis page, looks like the CAPE is there, but so is the cap...Wonder if we will get anything to break through that?

NWS has backed off of the temps a bit, going for mid 80's for a high,. Locally we hit 92.4 degrees yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SPC has put most of NE/N IL in the Slight Risk, with the exception of the SE counties.

Looking at the Meso Analysis page, looks like the CAPE is there, but so is the cap...Wonder if we will get anything to break through that?

NWS has backed off of the temps a bit, going for mid 80's for a high,. Locally we hit 92.4 degrees yesterday.

Should still be plenty of moisture. LSX is expecting thunderstorms to break out in their area between noon and 3, and then move north and east from there, so even if the cap doesn't break right in the Chicago area, storms may be able to survive the trek east.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, they just made some major upgrades. Nearly all of Wisconsin is under slight risk, and tornado probs in Southwest and SouthCentral Wisconsin are up to 5%.

Dewpoints are almost up to 60 even in Milwaukee with the cool lake nearby. Going to be some good destabilization occurring.

I think the prospects for organized severe east of I90 in Wisconsin are pretty low with shear values pretty sucky and best forcing west. As for moisture, looks like another juicy day and you can see some minor pooling of dps along the warmfront in southern wisconsin and northern illinois with ORD at 75/68. It also looks like sbcape will be greater than earlier thought with clouds holding off and a few more hours of good sun likely. Lack of good forcing will keep things in check but anything that does pop up should be an efficient rain producer and have fequent lightening, with a hail threat in the most intense cells.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the prospects for organized severe east of I90 in Wisconsin are pretty low with shear values pretty sucky and best forcing west. As for moisture, looks like another juicy day and you can see some minor pooling of dps along the warmfront in southern wisconsin and northern illinois with ORD at 75/68. It also looks like sbcape will be greater than earlier thought with clouds holding off and a few more hours of good sun likely. Lack of good forcing will keep things in check but anything that does pop up should be an efficient rain producer and have fequent lightening, with a hail threat in the most intense cells.

You're probably right, but they weren't expecting any organized severe when the Day 1 outlook first came out, so it is a positive development nonetheless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SPC has put most of NE/N IL in the Slight Risk, with the exception of the SE counties.

Looking at the Meso Analysis page, looks like the CAPE is there, but so is the cap...Wonder if we will get anything to break through that?

NWS has backed off of the temps a bit, going for mid 80's for a high,. Locally we hit 92.4 degrees yesterday.

Reading LOTs discussion, i think they expected cloud cover to overspread the region quicker than it looks like it will. Based off the current vis sat and 75 degree reading at ORD as of 9am, i think they bust too low on the 82 point high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...