Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,587
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

SNE May-hem


HoarfrostHubb

Recommended Posts

It seems though we don't need significant jet dynamics to get the heavier rains. I do agree that a deep ULL is need to grab significant PWAT air from the sub tropics and rip it on north. The mother's day flood was interesting in that it had a nice 850ish or so jet pumping in very warm and moist air, but also an e-ne LLJ that also focused convergence in the low levels over eastern and especially ne mass. Coastal frontogenesis in a way. Indeed this setup might be too aggressive on the euro, but it's interesting to look at. I don't have any feelings either way, but just from a met standpoint.

As far a marine meteorology, I do find nor'easters interesting. I love a good tstm, but lets face it...this is SNE. I think it's eastern areas of SNE that tend to have more dynamic wx from coastal storm impacts..whether it be due to coastal fronts, deformation, or S+ being whipped around by 40+kt winds. To me, seeing snow whipped around and drifting beats getting an extra inch or two of fluff in the interior due to ratios, but again..it is all subjective.Obviously, the interior averages more snow, but I'm talking more in the way of a single event where Ray gets 13" and I get 11" or something like that.

Yeah, being on the coast gives you and esp. Phil and Messenger the wind factor which in winter events is awesome. When the snow gets all plastered to everything you can't beat it.

I'm still happy with my yearly totals...:weight_lift: Maybe next year interior elevations will cash in

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yeah, being on the coast gives you and esp. Phil and Messenger the wind factor which in winter events is awesome. When the snow gets all plastered to everything you can't beat it.

I'm still happy with my yearly totals...:weight_lift: Maybe next year interior elevations will cash in

Yeah I mean there is no question you guys get more snow, but for me...I love the ferocity of storms. Like John said, it's a product of where you grew up. If I lived where Pete lived...I'm sure I would love rotted lake effect and the significant snowpack retention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I mean there is no question you guys get more snow, but for me...I love the ferocity of storms. Like John said, it's a product of where you grew up. If I lived where Pete lived...I'm sure I would love rotted lake effect and the significant snowpack retention.

Does Boston really get much more wind in winter storms than someone like Ray, a little inland? To me, places like Cape Ann, Hull, and Cape Cod itself are the places to be. Obviously they are not sheltered at all and face the full brunt. Boston I'm sure at times gets the real ferocious storms ('78, etc), but is seems a little sheltered, despite being on the water.

Maybe having more of a southerly face makes a difference? Probably why Boston became a seaport to begin with...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does Boston really get much more wind in winter storms than someone like Ray, a little inland? To me, places like Cape Ann, Hull, and Cape Cod itself are the places to be. Obviously they are not sheltered at all and face the full brunt. Boston I'm sure at times gets the real ferocious storms ('78, etc), but is seems a little sheltered, despite being on the water.

Maybe having more of a southerly face makes a difference? Probably why Boston became a seaport to begin with...

Part of the reason why areas inland like Brockton get more wind then areas inland like where Ray is, is due to the coastal front. Coastal fronts as you know separate areas of more marine air (although this too can be quite cold) vs a more polar or arctic air. The colder air is more stable and creates an inversion where winds can't mix down like they could in a more warmer, marine environment. Of course in the interior, friction also reduces wind...but I had many storms with strong winds growing up in Brockton..simply because they were able to mix down being on the other side of the CF from time to time. Boston has the same issue. Many times the CF is south of them and instead of 40kt ne winds...it might be more 25-30kt north winds with a temp in the 20s...or even teens. Sometimes you can get very strong winds in the interior like we saw in the Boxing day storm, ...that storm had stronger winds on Orange as compared to Boston. However, that's kind of the exception. As you said...northeast exposed areas like Hull, Cape Ann..etc definitely get the brunt of the winds in many coastals. I think BOS would do better with a wind that's more like 050--090 or something like that.

Coastal fronts aren't always the rain snow line either. Many areas this winter had heavy snows on the east side of the front. In Jan '05, most of se mass and the Cape was on the "warmer" side of the front, yet got 2-3' of snow. It was such an arctic airmass that temps were in the 20s to near 30 with a 60-70kt ne wind. That cold also allowed extremely strong winds to mix down at the surface.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of the reason why areas inland like Brockton get more wind then areas inland like where Ray is, is due to the coastal front. Coastal fronts as you know separate areas of more marine air (although this too can be quite cold) vs a more polar or arctic air. The colder air is more stable and creates an inversion where winds can't mix down like they could in a more warmer, marine environment. Of course in the interior, friction also reduces wind...but I had many storms with strong winds growing up in Brockton..simply because they were able to mix down being on the other side of the CF from time to time. Boston has the same issue. Many times the CF is south of them and instead of 40kt ne winds...it might be more 25-30kt north winds with a temp in the 20s...or even teens. Sometimes you can get very strong winds in the interior like we saw in the Boxing day storm, ...that storm had stronger winds on Orange as compared to Boston. However, that's kind of the exception. As you said...northeast exposed areas like Hull, Cape Ann..etc definitely get the brunt of the winds in many coastals. I think BOS would do better with a wind that's more like 050--090 or something like that.

Coastal fronts aren't always the rain snow line either. Many areas this winter had heavy snows on the east side of the front. In Jan '05, most of se mass and the Cape was on the "warmer" side of the front, yet got 2-3' of snow. It was such an arctic airmass that temps were in the 20s to near 30 with a 60-70kt ne wind. That cold also allowed extremely strong winds to mix down at the surface.

If you go back and look at when BOS had some of it's strongest winds from the northeast.it's probably with temps near 32F or a bit warmer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of the reason why areas inland like Brockton get more wind then areas inland like where Ray is, is due to the coastal front. Coastal fronts as you know separate areas of more marine air (although this too can be quite cold) vs a more polar or arctic air. The colder air is more stable and creates an inversion where winds can't mix down like they could in a more warmer, marine environment. Of course in the interior, friction also reduces wind...but I had many storms with strong winds growing up in Brockton..simply because they were able to mix down being on the other side of the CF from time to time. Boston has the same issue. Many times the CF is south of them and instead of 40kt ne winds...it might be more 25-30kt north winds with a temp in the 20s...or even teens. Sometimes you can get very strong winds in the interior like we saw in the Boxing day storm, ...that storm had stronger winds on Orange as compared to Boston. However, that's kind of the exception. As you said...northeast exposed areas like Hull, Cape Ann..etc definitely get the brunt of the winds in many coastals. I think BOS would do better with a wind that's more like 050--090 or something like that.

Coastal fronts aren't always the rain snow line either. Many areas this winter had heavy snows on the east side of the front. In Jan '05, most of se mass and the Cape was on the "warmer" side of the front, yet got 2-3' of snow. It was such an arctic airmass that temps were in the 20s to near 30 with a 60-70kt ne wind. That cold also allowed extremely strong winds to mix down at the surface.

It's funny because I always dreaded seeing the wind kick up here during winter storms.....I'd expect the worst and sure enough, I'd go outside and discover dripping from all structures and the car windows fogged up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's funny because I always dreaded seeing the wind kick up here during winter storms.....I'd expect the worst and sure enough, I'd go outside and discover dripping from all structures and the car windows fogged up.

Usually if the CF gets to you...it's probably an indication of a strong push or marine air, so yeah I would dread it too. Likely means that BOS is rain or very close to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually if the CF gets to you...it's probably an indication of a strong push or marine air, so yeah I would dread it too. Likely means that BOS is rain or very close to it.

I have witnessed extreme scenarios where the CF separates 10F powder from 30-32F wet snow... It all depends on the antecedent cold and supply vector. If the arctic-polar hybrid air mass does not have enough time to modify post advection off the coast, the return flow can be intreresting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have witnessed extreme scenarios where the CF separates 10F powder from 30-32F wet snow... It all depends on the antecedent cold and supply vector. If the arctic-polar hybrid air mass does not have enough time to modify post advection off the coast, the return flow can be intreresting.

Yeah for sure. Back in Dec of '08 it separated temps of around 18 in BOS to 32F in Hull.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lmao: Will

Hey Scott, the Canadian operational changed tune a tad and marginally warm sectors us at D5.

Yeah that's an interesting run. Polar front sags south at d4, then retreats north on d5, followed by a west to east movement of the front as low pressure develops off the Mid Atlantic by d6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...