Ginx snewx Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Would a retro scenario draw in that manky marine crud? Way north maybe, with heights so low and the cyrosphere so cold this is a way different setup. That being said coastal areas always have issues with NE winds in early Dec. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaineJayhawk Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 I have nothing but the utmost respect for mall cops Black Ops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Would a retro scenario draw in that manky marine crud? I would imagine if it retrograded far enough west we would get infiltrated with marine air, Happened last jan, And its not as cold now as it was then....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalcottWx Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Do I buy retro scenario? NOPE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropopause_Fold Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Do I buy retro scenario? NOPE. you should buy it. one way or another, multiple lows are going to rotate NW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 you should buy it. one way or another, multiple lows are going to rotate NW Yes, It looks like that is whats going to take place, But it will come down to where the actual low is to who is nearby to benifit from it, Most guidance has it in canada........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eduggs Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 you should buy it. one way or another, multiple lows are going to rotate NW Very true. Hopefully they are moving N instead of S or SW when they affect us. Otherwise they'll already be occluded and moisture lacking. If a stronger s/w doesn't materialize out west and amplify as it slides across the country, the entire baroclinic environment will be swept offshore. We need the s/w and the baroclinicity to collide over land to our SW. Not in the Maritimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowNH Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Ummm.. 84 hour Nam looks good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Pretty high RH on there signalling some light snows in the air 10-30% RH at H7 and 70-90% at H85 is "pretty high RH"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Ummm.. 84 hour Nam looks good LOL, it does...but I need something else other than the 84 hr NAM. Interesting, however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eduggs Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Ummm.. 84 hour Nam looks good Was just going to say the same. Very interesting for mid-atlantic especially. More model support for a stronger clipper s/w - that's critical! Plenty of vorticity to sharpen the longwave trof axis just enough to fight back against the NE vortex. Extrap it might not hit New England. Unless the NE energy phased back into the whole developing trof. Then we'd have a sig storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropopause_Fold Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 LOL, it does...but I need something else other than the 84 hr NAM. Interesting, however. c'mon. it's a lock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaineJayhawk Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 LOL, it does...but I need something else other than the 84 hr NAM. Interesting, however. If I have to hug the 84 hr NAM I will, dammit. But seriously, does that sort of correlate with what the 0z Euro was selling? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Torchey Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Ummm.. 84 hour Nam looks good Step in the right direction, lets see if the gfs follows. Looks decent at 5,700 mb. Nice kink in the isobars from charlotte ne thru raleigh and off the va capes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 If I have to hug the 84 hr NAM I will, dammit. But seriously, does that sort of correlate with what the 0z Euro was selling? It does. If we extrapolate the NAM (yes I know that's bad) we do see the s/w trying to turn the corner imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 It does. If we extrapolate the NAM (yes I know that's bad) we do see the s/w trying to turn the corner imo. s/w's stay either slightly positve/neutral tilted too from 72-84 HR which is good...not taking a negative tilt too early so this still gives time for the s/w to continue to dig. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 LOL, it does...but I need something else other than the 84 hr NAM. Interesting, however. It definitely is more like the 00z Euro...even more amplified actually. First model to hint at Dec 5th last year was the 84h NAM...I remember the Euro was too flat until inside of 72h. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 It definitely is more like the 00z Euro...even more amplified actually. First model to hint at Dec 5th last year was the 84h NAM...I remember the Euro was too flat until inside of 72h. As horrible as the NAM can be at the 84th hour every once in a while it can catch onto something and then eventually other model guidance will start to catch on...would be nice if that happens to be the case here. Another good sign how this is more like the euro...if these two start showing some decent agreement there is a good chance something is up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 It definitely is more like the 00z Euro...even more amplified actually. First model to hint at Dec 5th last year was the 84h NAM...I remember the Euro was too flat until inside of 72h. SREF's have it too..just a little less amplified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaineJayhawk Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 It definitely is more like the 00z Euro...even more amplified actually. First model to hint at Dec 5th last year was the 84h NAM...I remember the Euro was too flat until inside of 72h. Good news! It will be interesting to see if the GFS comes around to this thinking. Under 4 days out is generally considered prime time for the Euro, correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 As horrible as the NAM can be at the 84th hour every once in a while it can catch onto something and then eventually other model guidance will start to catch on...would be nice if that happens to be the case here. Another good sign how this is more like the euro...if these two start showing some decent agreement there is a good chance something is up. That's the old EE rule. Still a bit early to implement it, but if the Euro comes in more amplified at 12z, you might be able to take it to the bank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 It definitely is more like the 00z Euro...even more amplified actually. First model to hint at Dec 5th last year was the 84h NAM...I remember the Euro was too flat until inside of 72h. I like the fact that it's modeled like that on the NAM. Something that strong will help force the PV north a bit, but also, get cyclogenesis started earlier and perhaps further north. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 I like the fact that it's modeled like that on the NAM. Something that strong will help force the PV north a bit, but also, get cyclogenesis started earlier and perhaps further north. THe sharp increase in the winds at the base of the s/w trough may be an indication as well that cyclogenesis may in fact begin right around the end of the NAM's timeframe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropopause_Fold Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 I like the fact that it's modeled like that on the NAM. Something that strong will help force the PV north a bit, but also, get cyclogenesis started earlier and perhaps further north. helps to not have the ULL closed yet over the NE/GOM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaineJayhawk Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Mike at the Pit should be happy - we might have a legitimate threat under 10 days out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 helps to not have the ULL closed yet over the NE/GOM. It's like a recipe with this pattern, to get a storm here...like you're baking a dish, lol. A little of this..little of that......in this case, a little weaker here..little stronger there. I guess it's a step in the right direction, but I want to see the gfs and euro continue. I think the one thing that the NAM is sometimes good with..is depicting the resulting further north depiction when we have these blocks. Of course, it didn't work last year, but I do remember 12/5 and iirc I think it hinted at 12/19?? Will probably would know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropopause_Fold Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 It's like a recipe with this pattern, to get a storm here...like you're baking a dish, lol. A little of this..little of that......in this case, a little weaker here..little stronger there. I guess it's a step in the right direction, but I want to see the gfs and euro continue. I think the one thing that the NAM is sometimes good with..is depicting the resulting further north depiction when we have these blocks. Of course, it didn't work last year, but I do remember 12/5 and iirc I think it hinted at 12/19?? Will probably would know. good analogy. a lot of these things you can't really separate out either. cause/effect as always. that's why signaling out something that needs to change 1000 miles away is worthwhile but fruitless at the same time. LOL. yeah i think that and actually the first october snow of last season as well. the nam did well early on before being beaten to a pulp later on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 It's like a recipe with this pattern, to get a storm here...like you're baking a dish, lol. A little of this..little of that......in this case, a little weaker here..little stronger there. I guess it's a step in the right direction, but I want to see the gfs and euro continue. I think the one thing that the NAM is sometimes good with..is depicting the resulting further north depiction when we have these blocks. Of course, it didn't work last year, but I do remember 12/5 and iirc I think it hinted at 12/19?? Will probably would know. NAM does well in getting the storms further north and the first to notice it. It never showed snow here in the 2/5 storm...and I think only 1 or 2 runs showed big snow here in the 2/10 storm. It definitely red flagged potential for a nasty cutoff near us in that. It was terrific in the 12/5 event. The 12/19 storm it performed terribly on IIRC. It was dry even in NYC until pretty close in and then all of the sudden it went bonkers and hit MRG's area with a max which was obviously wrong and overdone with the trend. So its not perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropopause_Fold Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 NAM does well in getting the storms further north and the first to notice it. It never showed snow here in the 2/5 storm...and I think only 1 or 2 runs showed big snow here in the 2/10 storm. It definitely red flagged potential for a nasty cutoff near us in that. It was terrific in the 12/5 event. The 12/19 storm it performed terribly on IIRC. It was dry even in NYC until pretty close in and then all of the sudden it went bonkers and hit MRG's area with a max which was obviously wrong and overdone with the trend. So its not perfect. really?? i thought for sure there was an 18z nam run that came in all of sudden brought it much further north...maybe not. i certainly don't log these things into my memory bank like you. edit: wait...just read that again. maybe we are thinking of the same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.