Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,613
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RyRyB
    Newest Member
    RyRyB
    Joined

00z GFS 11/30


Dsnowx53

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I don't necessarily expect much from the GFS...it's been a huge outlier with regards to showing essentially no surface reflection. That could easily be due to its cold bias...where all the blocking and confluence causes any shortwave to shear out.

The 12z GFS certainly had some potential in the upper levels, and the 500mb low closed off and tried to turn the flow meridional, but there was no surface reflection. The 18z GFS had a stronger initial impulse of energy, but the energy kind of split up...and the flow could not turn meridional.

I'd be surprised if its cold bias does not show up again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this will look a little better than 18z, but there still might not be a great surface reflection. The ridging in the central states is weaker, and that's a good sign.

The upper level low over the northeast is still a huge problem..and it's moving way too slowly on the GFS to allow anything of relevance to affect us with the shortwave over the upper midwest that becomes our potential storm. That shortwave is a bit slower this run, though, so that could offer some hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The upper level low over the northeast is still a huge problem..and it's moving way too slowly on the GFS to allow anything of relevance to affect us with the shortwave over the upper midwest that becomes our potential storm. That shortwave is a bit slower this run, though, so that could offer some hope.

Oh yeah, definitely. We do often see this in the models, especially the GFS, where it keeps that upper level low around for way too long, and has it be a very strong feature, which does not allow much room for amplification.

As long as the GFS remains an outlier in this regard, we should be in good shape. I do see a bit more room on the 00z GFS, but nothing that stands out as "wow".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't necessarily expect much from the GFS...it's been a huge outlier with regards to showing essentially no surface reflection. That could easily be due to its cold bias...where all the blocking and confluence causes any shortwave to shear out.

The 12z GFS certainly had some potential in the upper levels, and the 500mb low closed off and tried to turn the flow meridional, but there was no surface reflection. The 18z GFS had a stronger initial impulse of energy, but the energy kind of split up...and the flow could not turn meridional.

I'd be surprised if its cold bias does not show up again.

Responding to myself, lol...the 0z GFS has a much better consolidation of the energy at 144 hours...I still expect a whiff, but the upper-level trends have been better than I expected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...