Brian5671 Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Euro and Euro ens..areobviously the way to go ..Sref's look ridiculous lol ..awful crap that is Last week you were hugging the GFS.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisM Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Which county is Norfolk? Don't they usually do well? Norfolk CT? Northern Litchfield County. Elevation around 1700' up there, Connecticut's "Ice Box" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomNH Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 NAM looks solid IMBY. First call - 4-8''. By right I should probably go 9-14'' or something like that, but I'm just not feeling bullish yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 it was just updated to that I think it's an old map. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arnold214 Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 God damn is that 18z NAM a thing of beauty. Lock that sucker in NOW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bboughton Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 No one is believing in the NAM God damn is that 18z NAM a thing of beauty. Lock that sucker in NOW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Torchey Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Which county is Norfolk? Don't they usually do well? Litchfield I think, whatever the county they are the icebox and snow capital of ct. They get dumped on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian5671 Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Litchfield I think, whatever the county they are the icebox and snow capital of ct. They get dumped on. Southern edge of the Berkshires with good elevation.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bboughton Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 So it was. Does he know something we don't? it was just updated to that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OKpowdah Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 NAM is starting to get a clue, but there is ZERO reason to use it when you have very consistent globals to work with. Maybe it will become 10% useful by 12z tomorrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavisStraight Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 I think it's an old map. He just put up the same map on tv, he gets vague the further you get from Boston Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collinsville Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Norfolk CT? Northern Litchfield County. Elevation around 1700' up there, Connecticut's "Ice Box" Elevation is 1340' for the observer. Nobody lives at 1700' in CT that I'm aware of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisM Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Elevation is 1340' for the observer. Nobody lives at 1700' in CT that I'm aware of. all I know is the green sign says "Elev. 1700'" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Norfolk CT? Northern Litchfield County. Elevation around 1700' up there, Connecticut's "Ice Box" AIT... They get rocked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 all I know is the green sign says "Elev. 1700'" ? Where The sign in the center of sign says like elevation 1240 or something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collinsville Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 all I know is the green sign says "Elev. 1700'" where exactly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arnold214 Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 18Z NAM looks great, wouldn't mind locking that bad boy in. At least it is making more sense now. Also, GYX's discussion doesn't make any sense..Models have trended colder now, with more snow, yet they have less snow forecast now, and more chances of rain then the warmer solutions we had this morning. They also seem to really downplay this storm. Sometimes I scratch my head.. MAY SEE ENOUGH QPF TO GENERATE 6 INCHES OR MORE OF OF SNOW IN SOME AREAS....AND WILL THEREFORE KEEP THE WATCH AS IS FOR NOW. Some areas?? What the heck is that? Just look at the models and come to you own conclusions. I plead the 5th after that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jt5019 Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 not so bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Euro ensembles looks absolutely amazing for a good chunk of SNE....BOS included. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 God damn is that 18z NAM a thing of beauty. Lock that sucker in NOW. Ummmmmm.......I'd rather not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 I think the Chatham sounding was at -7.5C at 850. Temps in the interior are in the mid 50s. Super adiabatic atmosphere right now, but plenty cold aloft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 God damn is that 18z NAM a thing of beauty. Lock that sucker in NOW. Will be on back up power at the office verbatium Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bboughton Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 So there's hope? Euro ensembles looks absolutely amazing for a good chunk of SNE....BOS included. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 I like the 12z CMC Yeah...48-54hr goes bonkers for us. 1"+ QPF in 6hrs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomNH Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Yeah...48-54hr goes bonkers for us. 1"+ QPF in 6hrs. You're getting crushed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Yeah...48-54hr goes bonkers for us. 1"+ QPF in 6hrs. I will jump on as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ski MRG Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Ummmmmm.......I'd rather not. Mike, prepare to be buried. We're going to catch a good dose of snow. Accentuate the positive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Barry Burbank and Harvey Leonard are almost in EXACT agreement on their ranges... pretty cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Barry Burbank and Harvey Leonard are almost in EXACT agreement on their ranges... pretty cool Bout time you showed up! What's your call? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Bout time you showed up! What's your call? Good to be here! Sooo busy with school and outdoor track I haven't had much time to post here lately. Hope you're all doing well. Looking into it now... frankly have no clue because I haven't looked at a model since last night lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.