prinsburg_wx Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Gonna be costly. SV has the spag plots with all the members but they just give a idea about pressure. Then ofcourse have the ensemble mean at 6hr intervals with QPF etc. FWIW the ensemble mean has about .75 in your area. The ensembles are pretty widespread with tracks from across the northern Plains/Upper MW into the lakes to aas far south and east as central/Southern Plains to Ohio Valley/E.GL-se Canada/Toronto/The NE. The mean takes it e/ene from there to near Detroit into Canada. Thanks Harry, i will check SV out & see how costly this will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baroclinic_instability Posted March 30, 2011 Author Share Posted March 30, 2011 Thanks for your insight! Hope you are enjoying the new job/location! Thanks man! It is going great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baroclinic_instability Posted March 30, 2011 Author Share Posted March 30, 2011 euro mean at 120...sure would like to see some of those members...anyone know where i can shell out to get those? Thanks Harry, i will check SV out & see how costly this will be. I suggest just going with the freebie stuff from Euro. It shows the mean with normalized standard deviations and compares it to the op run. Good enough to get an idea what the other members are doing and where the discrepancies lie. And it is free Paying for the Euro for purposes of tracking weather as a hobby is a bit of an expensive proposition unless you are starting your own weather company. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo6899 Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 would be nice if the low just kept going east instead of weakening then strenghtening making the WAA come further north. Odd looking storm so far on the GFS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prinsburg_wx Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 0z ggem coming in line with euro/gfs but still dumps over 1.20 qpf here & gfs with similar amounts so not good for the flooding problems. 96 & 108 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baroclinic_instability Posted March 31, 2011 Author Share Posted March 31, 2011 Prins or anyone else have Euro precip for MN and Red River Valley? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prinsburg_wx Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 Prins or anyone else have Euro precip for MN and Red River Valley? BWP SUN 06Z 03-APR 3.1 1.3 1006 72 97 0.04 551 546 SUN 12Z 03-APR 2.3 1.4 999 87 90 0.29 549 550 SUN 18Z 03-APR 3.0 -0.4 996 92 93 0.16 546 549 MON 00Z 04-APR 1.6 -1.7 998 97 74 0.06 543 544 MON 06Z 04-APR 0.5 -4.3 1002 98 82 0.02 538 536 MON 12Z 04-APR 0.5 -5.0 1007 95 94 0.04 533 527 MON 18Z 04-APR 2.1 -6.1 1011 67 49 0.01 534 525 DLH SUN 18Z 03-APR 0.7 -3.5 1005 90 100 0.17 547 543 MON 00Z 04-APR 0.1 -3.8 1001 97 99 0.30 544 544 MON 06Z 04-APR -0.2 -3.9 999 98 86 0.18 542 543 MON 12Z 04-APR -0.1 -5.3 999 94 90 0.05 536 537 MON 18Z 04-APR 2.5 -4.9 1000 76 93 0.07 530 530 TUE 00Z 05-APR 2.4 -4.3 1002 78 87 0.08 529 527 TUE 06Z 05-APR -2.3 -5.7 1004 88 59 0.01 527 524 FAR SUN 06Z 03-APR 2.6 1.0 1006 71 96 0.01 549 544 SUN 12Z 03-APR 1.6 0.1 1001 92 98 0.46 547 547 SUN 18Z 03-APR 1.7 -2.2 999 95 94 0.33 544 545 MON 00Z 04-APR 1.2 -2.9 999 96 81 0.12 541 542 MON 06Z 04-APR 0.7 -4.9 1004 97 85 0.05 536 533 MON 12Z 04-APR 0.5 -5.0 1008 92 91 0.05 532 526 GFK SUN 12Z 03-APR 1.3 -3.2 1004 95 100 0.09 545 542 SUN 18Z 03-APR 1.3 -3.2 1001 97 94 0.42 541 540 MON 00Z 04-APR 1.1 -4.7 1003 98 86 0.22 538 536 MON 06Z 04-APR 0.6 -4.7 1007 98 92 0.15 534 529 MON 12Z 04-APR -0.6 -5.4 1010 86 87 0.05 533 525 MSP SUN 12Z 03-APR 2.6 1.4 1005 91 93 0.26 553 549 SUN 18Z 03-APR 5.5 0.8 998 86 73 0.13 553 555 MON 00Z 04-APR 5.0 3.6 994 95 63 0.07 549 554 MON 06Z 04-APR 2.9 0.8 996 98 39 0.03 546 549 MON 12Z 04-APR 1.1 -3.6 999 98 24 0.01 539 540 MON 18Z 04-APR 6.2 -3.4 1001 60 91 0.03 534 533 TUE 00Z 05-APR 5.4 -4.0 1004 57 90 0.04 532 529 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baroclinic_instability Posted March 31, 2011 Author Share Posted March 31, 2011 BWP SUN 06Z 03-APR 3.1 1.3 1006 72 97 0.04 551 546 SUN 12Z 03-APR 2.3 1.4 999 87 90 0.29 549 550 SUN 18Z 03-APR 3.0 -0.4 996 92 93 0.16 546 549 MON 00Z 04-APR 1.6 -1.7 998 97 74 0.06 543 544 MON 06Z 04-APR 0.5 -4.3 1002 98 82 0.02 538 536 MON 12Z 04-APR 0.5 -5.0 1007 95 94 0.04 533 527 MON 18Z 04-APR 2.1 -6.1 1011 67 49 0.01 534 525 DLH SUN 18Z 03-APR 0.7 -3.5 1005 90 100 0.17 547 543 MON 00Z 04-APR 0.1 -3.8 1001 97 99 0.30 544 544 MON 06Z 04-APR -0.2 -3.9 999 98 86 0.18 542 543 MON 12Z 04-APR -0.1 -5.3 999 94 90 0.05 536 537 MON 18Z 04-APR 2.5 -4.9 1000 76 93 0.07 530 530 TUE 00Z 05-APR 2.4 -4.3 1002 78 87 0.08 529 527 TUE 06Z 05-APR -2.3 -5.7 1004 88 59 0.01 527 524 FAR SUN 06Z 03-APR 2.6 1.0 1006 71 96 0.01 549 544 SUN 12Z 03-APR 1.6 0.1 1001 92 98 0.46 547 547 SUN 18Z 03-APR 1.7 -2.2 999 95 94 0.33 544 545 MON 00Z 04-APR 1.2 -2.9 999 96 81 0.12 541 542 MON 06Z 04-APR 0.7 -4.9 1004 97 85 0.05 536 533 MON 12Z 04-APR 0.5 -5.0 1008 92 91 0.05 532 526 GFK SUN 12Z 03-APR 1.3 -3.2 1004 95 100 0.09 545 542 SUN 18Z 03-APR 1.3 -3.2 1001 97 94 0.42 541 540 MON 00Z 04-APR 1.1 -4.7 1003 98 86 0.22 538 536 MON 06Z 04-APR 0.6 -4.7 1007 98 92 0.15 534 529 MON 12Z 04-APR -0.6 -5.4 1010 86 87 0.05 533 525 MSP SUN 12Z 03-APR 2.6 1.4 1005 91 93 0.26 553 549 SUN 18Z 03-APR 5.5 0.8 998 86 73 0.13 553 555 MON 00Z 04-APR 5.0 3.6 994 95 63 0.07 549 554 MON 06Z 04-APR 2.9 0.8 996 98 39 0.03 546 549 MON 12Z 04-APR 1.1 -3.6 999 98 24 0.01 539 540 MON 18Z 04-APR 6.2 -3.4 1001 60 91 0.03 534 533 TUE 00Z 05-APR 5.4 -4.0 1004 57 90 0.04 532 529 Thanks! Wow--an odd run here. The Euro is really dry over MSP and has a much stronger lead S/W passing through the Dakotas. High frequency variability at its best...or worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goknights Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 GFS is showing a pretty significant back end dump of snow in southeast minnesota through wisconsin. Is the euro showing something similar? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prinsburg_wx Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 GFS is showing a pretty significant back end dump of snow in southeast minnesota through wisconsin. Is the euro showing something similar? euro warmer & mainly light qpf with the heavier stuff up north. Most offices in MN & the dakotas are tossing the 0z run of the euro and going with the gfs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prinsburg_wx Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 12z ukie has come n compared to prior runs 84 & 96hr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWeatherPimp Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 I honestly see a track along the lines of the Ukie coming closer to verifying than some of the other tracks out there right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerball Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 would be nice if the low just kept going east instead of weakening then strenghtening making the WAA come further north. Odd looking storm so far on the GFS. Yeah, we're screwed each and every way with this storm. Luckily it's April. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmichweather Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 I hate asking for it every model run but if anyone has it could someone list the bwp,far,gfk euro qpf from the 12z whenever they get a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prinsburg_wx Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 I hate asking for it every model run but if anyone has it could someone list the bwp,far,gfk euro qpf from the 12z whenever they get a chance. BWP SUN 06Z 03-APR 3.4 1.6 1005 67 98 0.03 551 547 SUN 12Z 03-APR 2.2 1.1 998 86 87 0.25 549 550 SUN 18Z 03-APR 3.2 0.8 995 90 95 0.08 545 549 MON 00Z 04-APR 2.1 -1.5 996 95 59 0.06 540 543 MON 06Z 04-APR 0.4 -3.4 998 99 68 0.02 531 533 MON 12Z 04-APR 0.4 -5.1 1003 94 91 0.07 529 527 MON 18Z 04-APR 2.5 -6.2 1010 66 54 0.02 533 525 DLH SUN 12Z 03-APR -0.3 -2.1 1008 78 72 0.01 548 541 SUN 18Z 03-APR 0.6 -3.0 1004 94 99 0.34 548 545 MON 00Z 04-APR 0.2 -3.4 999 98 100 0.25 544 545 MON 06Z 04-APR -0.3 -3.3 996 98 87 0.18 540 543 MON 12Z 04-APR -0.4 -4.7 995 96 82 0.04 531 534 MON 18Z 04-APR 2.0 -5.3 998 74 91 0.12 526 528 TUE 00Z 05-APR 1.8 -5.1 1003 77 82 0.07 528 526 FAR SUN 06Z 03-APR 3.3 1.0 1006 62 97 0.01 549 545 SUN 12Z 03-APR 1.5 -1.3 1000 92 97 0.38 547 547 SUN 18Z 03-APR 1.7 -1.6 997 96 99 0.12 543 546 MON 00Z 04-APR 1.5 -2.4 997 96 81 0.10 539 541 MON 06Z 04-APR 0.6 -4.4 999 98 88 0.04 530 531 MON 12Z 04-APR 0.4 -5.0 1004 92 94 0.10 529 526 MON 18Z 04-APR 2.6 -6.6 1010 63 38 0.02 533 524 GFK SUN 12Z 03-APR 1.1 -2.7 1003 98 99 0.19 544 542 SUN 18Z 03-APR 1.4 -3.1 999 98 89 0.30 540 541 MON 00Z 04-APR 1.1 -4.3 999 98 93 0.20 536 536 MON 06Z 04-APR 0.7 -5.1 1001 98 87 0.18 530 529 MON 12Z 04-APR -0.2 -5.3 1007 84 89 0.09 531 525 MSP SUN 12Z 03-APR 3.4 1.5 1004 80 98 0.14 554 550 SUN 18Z 03-APR 6.0 0.5 997 81 95 0.31 552 555 MON 00Z 04-APR 5.6 3.4 994 97 94 0.08 547 553 MON 06Z 04-APR 3.6 0.6 995 98 41 0.04 542 547 MON 12Z 04-APR 1.8 -2.8 997 97 41 0.01 534 536 MON 18Z 04-APR 5.3 -4.0 1000 66 97 0.05 529 529 TUE 00Z 05-APR 4.8 -4.4 1005 59 84 0.08 532 528 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmichweather Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 thanks! seems like the heaviest qpf, in relation to the red river valley falls further north up towards gfk so we know that it'll be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 18z GFS looks like it spawns three separate sfc centers between 84 and 132. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 18z GFS looks like it spawns three separate sfc centers between 84 and 132. Yeah, looks like it could be a potential severe to snow event for extreme S. Lower Michigan, really a crazy system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hm8 Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 Wow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wisconsinwx Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 Yeah, looks like it could be a potential severe to snow event for extreme S. Lower Michigan, really a crazy system. So is it cooler on the whole? I saw that Detroit would get quite a bit of snow verbatim, is it the same going due west from there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 So is it cooler on the whole? I saw that Detroit would get quite a bit of snow verbatim, is it the same going due west from there? Only in MI, not much snow other than maybe Northern IN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 Only in MI, not much snow other than maybe Northern IN. Hit me pretty good too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 Hit me pretty good too. Ahh yeah I forgot it slid up your way too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWeatherPimp Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmichweather Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 BTW if you guys are feeling extra obsessed with model trends you can follow the parallel gfs and see how it handles this upcoming storm. http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwpara/analysis/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 My money would be on the euro and this is not saying much either. Reason being is models typically try to break down blocking patterns too quick. We have already seen this happening starting with the system now crossing the country/tomorrow/Wed as well which the models at one point tried to weaken the block enough for the system to track up this way. Same with the weekend system. The GFS has been struggling big time with this pattern too and has been wanting to warm things up much too quickly via the breaking down of the blocking. I suspect the MJO had a bit to do with this as it has briefly come out of the circle of death and gained a little momentum but that has ceased again and thus headed back to the circle of death as i like to call it. Whenever that happens models tend to go belly up for whatever reason. Not saying their wont be a storm but i would not get too caught up in the details such as track/rn vs sn etc just yet. I suspect like many ( nearly all ) systems we are not even close to seeing the final track of this thing which will shift and probably by alot of miles. Keep in mind it is starting to look like there is really nothing to push and or to shake things up with the pattern from the pacific into N.America etc which we can somewhat thank the MJO crapping back out for. At this moment in time ( for several months except briefly ) the way it is progressing is by following the cold signals. Right now it is in phase 5 where it looks to go into that circle of death. In winter ( say Dec-Jan ) that typically results in westcoast trough with ridge in the east while at THIS point in the year it is a cold/trough signal in the midwest/GL/ne. As we move along so do the phase numbers and at this moment in time some modeling has it poking back out into phase 7 which by then will be a cold signal and thus suggests storms tracking farther s/e. The euro weeklies etc have been advertising the colder pattern holding on as well through most of April. That does not bode well for systems tracking from the Rockies to the upper MW/N.Plains/N.GL. The weeklies were the first to hit on the current cold we have as well but still they are not the end all either. Point is other then the GFS/CMC there is not much else to suggest that kind of pattern change to bring the storm track etc those models are suggesting. Ofcourse with weaker signals things can change in a hurry as we saw late last Feb into March last year and despite the -NAO/-AO holding on ( as it had all winter ) things warmed up quickly and we were torching by this point. My belief is the -AO helped to drain all the cold air and thus we lacked a decent cold air source by the time March rolled around and thus things moderated quickly. Why too people need not get caught up in a -NAO/-AO equals cold and +NAO/+AO or whatever always equals warm because it just does not work like that. When the AO is + that means we have a cold air source to work with as the PV tends to hang up north which allows the cold to build and a little blocking or say epo ridge can be enough to send it our way and pretty cold at that ( it is a fresh supply ) as we are currently seeing. Truthfully this is a explosive pattern if we can ever get the right ingredients to come together and thus some decent warmth/moisture from a now above normal GOM to clash with some of that decent cold to the north. March 93 had this with a GOM that had gotten pretty warm ( above normal ) and we still had a decent supply of cold to the north which decided to pay a visit and well you know the rest of that story. The QBO etc is nearly the same as well. Thus a few reasons to watch this thing ( and or this period over the next few weeks ) either way. This basically as good as it is ever gonna get for big bomb potential. Hopefully i made that easy to understand for all as well. Trying to not get too technical as i know we have a number of people who don't understand the terms etc. If i did botch anything feel free to mention it as i have done it before when i try to not be too technical. In short don't get too caught up in modeling. They have been struggling a bit lately especially beyond 72-96+hrs and beyond. Amazing how quick things can change but as mentioned with the models struggling it will be possible to see quick changes. You all ready for this? I was doing some peaking around and before i even begin i will say not to get too excited yet. In short the models are busting BIG TIME with the MJO progression to start with. It is out of the circle of death and it just crossed into phase 6 and more importantly ( remember what i said about keeping excitement in check ) the models have it making it to phase 8. Both phase 6 and 8 are the warmer signals. Phase 7 cold which yeah i find odd too but thats what the MJO climo for this time of year says. Anyways none of them have a strong blocking ( -NAO ) signature and right on time the NAO has begun to rise. That increases the odd's of our system being able to stay on a more ne/ene track vs getting shunted east/ese as it approaches the GL/this region. Thus we could see the severe threat make it's way farther north into the S.Lakes anyways. Only way the S.Lakes ( S.WI/S.MI etc ) sees any snow is if we get something like the 18z GFS shows. Again just keep in mind of how quick things can change because well in short THE MODELS are total suckage right now. If we can make phase 8 then the chances are good we go into a warmer regime. How long that lasts will depend on what happens farther out with the MJO etc. Here is the climo for MJO Phase in April.. Here is temps. Precip. Kinda matches what the models are showing with this next big system. Thus see phase 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWeatherPimp Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 Here is the Parallel 18z GFS QPF output Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prinsburg_wx Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 0z ukie at 72...nice hit for GFK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 A month ago this may have been a nice front-end thump type system. However, the magnitude of the antecedent "arctic" (use that word loosely) airmass leaves a lot to be desired. 6z NAM/GFS BUFKIT have YYZ starting as a bit of snow (~1"), but with sfc temps around 33-33.5. Considering these profiles tend to a have a slightly cold bias, it's not exactly a slam dunk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prinsburg_wx Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 Unless the models are playing an April Fools joke on us with the 0z/06z runs this storm is going down the crapper as far as significant snows are concerned unless you live in far n MN or ND. The threat of heavy precip around here is becoming less likely and thats good news with the current flooding situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.