Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

April 1st-2nd Nor'Easter Potential


Snow_Miser

Recommended Posts

Ok. They have the best verification scores for precip in the short range (<48). Goes back and forth with euro for 1st and 2nd place.

Not saying they are right in this instance but 3z srefs were 1" of precip from the storm and this new run is .25". Thats worth mentioning.

I know they are, but were still at the end of it's good range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Agree with you. If we had decently cold air aloft, then marginal initial temps and dew points probably wouldn't matter so much. But in this case, temps aloft are forecast to be around 0C at the start of the event, before the big WAA push arrives.

In last week's storm, high temps were near 50F and dew points were in the mid-upper 20s the day before. However, 850 mb temps were around -4 to -5C as the initial burst of precip. arrived early Wed morning.

Look at current temperatures observed and dewpoints. They are both coming way up from 24-36 hours ago. It's going to be damn hard to get them down far enough for accumulations at the coast and in the city, even with a perfect track and intensity. Losing the cold air this early in the game does not bode well for our "would be" grand finale of snow.

WX/PT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the evolution at 500mb supports its surface reflection. It's quite amplified but yet has a weak coastal that more or less just hangs out over the BM.

It didnt dig as much as gfs and euro.

It has the storm in a nice spot for our area, but precip on west side is lacking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the NAM is trying to go west...we have a general area of light snow over the tri-state area Thursday night...

Maybe, but I don't see how you get a general area of light snow with these temperature profiles and lack of vertical velocity, more likely, it's either drizzle, or a more moderate or even heavier snow, but it looks to me like mostly drizzle and temps in the upper 30s.

WX/PT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe, but I don't see how you get a general area of light snow with these temperature profiles and lack of vertical velocity, more likely, it's either drizzle, or a more moderate or even heavier snow, but it looks to me like mostly drizzle and temps in the upper 30s.

WX/PT

Thicknesses are in the low 530's and 850's are -4 and below. While it will not accumulate, due to light intensity, NAM is almost definitelty flakes falling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thicknesses are in the low 530's and 850's are -4 and below. While it will not accumulate, due to light intensity, NAM is almost definitelty flakes falling.

Once evaporational cooling lets up, you're not getting snow. I know it looks like snow on the model, but that doesn't mean you get snow on March 31st. I've seen this a million times when it's "not supposed to be raining", but it actually is raining because there is no cold air left around (at the surface) and the intensity is gone.

WX/PT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once evaporational cooling lets up, you're not getting snow. I know it looks like snow on the model, but that doesn't mean you get snow on March 31st. I've seen this a million times when it's "not supposed to be raining", but it actually is raining because there is no cold air left around (at the surface) and the intensity is gone.

WX/PT

Thanks for explanation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once evaporational cooling lets up, you're not getting snow. I know it looks like snow on the model, but that doesn't mean you get snow on March 31st. I've seen this a million times when it's "not supposed to be raining", but it actually is raining because there is no cold air left around (at the surface) and the intensity is gone.

WX/PT

And 12Z NAM fous rubs this idea right in our faces. There is no vertical velocity during Thursday night and T1 is +1C. When there is more intensity some snow flakes will be spit out, but to say a "general area of light snow over the area" I do not think is accurate. It may go back and forth between spitting out drizzle and flakes depending on intensity but I think that THAT is the best that you can hope for going by NAM on Thursday night.

WX/PT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...