Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

April 1st-2nd Nor'Easter Potential


Snow_Miser

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

LOL@ NoGaps-- looks like that came west too-- big hit for SE MA.

Yep. Nogaps came west from the previous run. It is well east of the GFS.

Wow you can tell the energy went out of this thread real quick.

ECM needs to save us.

Who is chasing with me? scooter.gif

I'm going to stay up and hope for the best.:snowman:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like you're already looking ahead to the April 9-10 threat lmao

The trends are definitely not encouraging for NYC metro, but it's always highly likely in April that we see an interior jackpot...from BGM to GFL is looking pretty set right now. I'd love to see it crush my hometown but I am probably going to drive for it anyway, so I just hope it bombs as much as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The trends are definitely not encouraging for NYC metro, but it's always highly likely in April that we see an interior jackpot...from BGM to GFL is looking pretty set right now. I'd love to see it crush my hometown but I am probably going to drive for it anyway, so I just hope it bombs as much as possible.

Doesnt the track dictate the jackpot though? I mean-- living through the 80s and early 90s-- we were just as likely to see an inland track in January and February as we are now. Back then 90% of the storms tracked inland lol.

Why are the ensembles consistently to the east?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesnt the track dictate the jackpot though? I mean-- living through the 80s and early 90s-- we were just as likely to see an inland track in January and February as we are now. Back then 90% of the storms tracked inland lol.

Why are the ensembles consistently to the east?

The GFS ENS did trend west from 18z to 0z, but it was hard not to given how disorganized the meager 18z GEFS were.

Sure, the track will dictate the jackpot zone, I just think those areas have historically done well in these set-ups and rate to continue, plus the track is inching west which means the Poconos/Catskills up to about GFL and Central VT is the sweet area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesnt the track dictate the jackpot though? I mean-- living through the 80s and early 90s-- we were just as likely to see an inland track in January and February as we are now. Back then 90% of the storms tracked inland lol.

Why are the ensembles consistently to the east?

bc the operational is awful....like most of the models ***whether they show snow or not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS ENS did trend west from 18z to 0z, but it was hard not to given how disorganized the meager 18z GEFS were.

The kicker system to the west is probably one of the reasons why the op and the ensembles are different. The op run didn't really develop it. It had a 1000 low in the central plains. The gefs had a 997 low well east of where the op run had it. That can possibly be the reason why the gefs is well east of the op run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except I want to see big snow and all snow. I think the Poconos where we have a house or Albany where my aunt lives could do great on this storm though, and not hard to get to either place.

Go snow or go home Snowman.gif

http://wxweb.meteostar.com/sample/sample.shtml?text=kmgj

Focus on hr42 to hr69. If that isnt biggest for you then I dont know what to tell you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://wxweb.meteost...shtml?text=kmgj

Focus on hr42 to hr69. If that isnt biggest for you then I dont know what to tell you.

Yeah the Hudson Valley gets destroyed on the 0z GFS...Southern VT probably does a little better esp with the elevation, but it's a great hit from SWF-BGM-ALB...that triangle gets crushed with the deformation axis, 700mb low tracks right near NYC...I'm actually surprised it relatively dryslots the Poconos as I would think they get more QPF than shown with this H7 track:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This storm is showing the same personalities as the last 3 noreasters. Wreaking absolute havoc on the models, hopefully the end result is the same, and hope the gfs moves east and the euro holds serve. If the gfs was a bit more east we would get crushed..Just some hope for us :weenie: 's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This storm is showing the same personalities as the last 3 noreasters. Wreaking absolute havoc on the models, hopefully the end result is the same, and hope the gfs moves east and the euro holds serve. If the gfs was a bit more east we would get crushed..Just some hope for us :weenie: 's

The GFS was just outright wrong about the last storm, never figured it out until it was happening...showed the storm tracking off NJ when it ended up off VA, huge track error for a 1-day forecast. So I wouldn't worry too much about it being west as long as the Euro and its Ensembles hold ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah the Hudson Valley gets destroyed on the 0z GFS...Southern VT probably does a little better esp with the elevation, but it's a great hit from SWF-BGM-ALB...that triangle gets crushed with the deformation axis, 700mb low tracks right near NYC...I'm actually surprised it relatively dryslots the Poconos as I would think they get more QPF than shown with this H7 track:

Here are some areas that get crushed on the 00z GFS

MGJ-- 2.02" All Snow

MSV-- 1.59" All Snow

FWN-- 1.65" Mostly Snow

ALB-- 2.13" All Snow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS was just outright wrong about the last storm, never figured it out until it was happening...showed the storm tracking off NJ when it ended up off VA, huge track error for a 1-day forecast. So I wouldn't worry too much about it being west as long as the Euro and its Ensembles hold ground.

what an awful performance that was..Tonights ens mean is way east of the op fyi, and the rest of the models track the storm offshore. And we should probly wait for the nam to get a better handle on this thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...