Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

April 1st-2nd Nor'Easter Potential


Snow_Miser

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Would rather have what NAM had then the filth the gfs just produced. Nam would get me over 60" and NYC close to 2nd place all time.

I tend to doubt that. The QPF is spread over a long time period. I don't think precip intensity would be sustained for long enough for snow to accumulate, even if snow were the dominant ptype, which is questionable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this was a month earlier in the season, we would be measuring snow in feet

Not with that track lol-- if the Boxing day storm took that track we would be using the analogs about how bad Decembers result in futile winters.... remember that? We were a week away from doing that anyway lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this was a month earlier in the season, we would be measuring snow in feet

Maybe not. With southeasterly mid-level flow, would probably be rain SE coastal sections and mix just inland.

That said, this threat is still real. I actually like this run of the GFS. I like the big storm, high QPF signal. We can work with that. Low heights/thicknesses are not too far away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The UKMET appears to have shortwave spacing issues that weaken or delay the SLP intensification and lessen the magnitude of the storm. It looks roughly like a hybrid of the NAM and GFS solutions, although that is oversimplified. Surface track looks pretty good but overall less exciting in terms of potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The UKMET appears to have shortwave spacing issues that weaken or delay the SLP intensification and lessen the magnitude of the storm. It looks roughly like a hybrid of the NAM and GFS solutions, although that is oversimplified. Surface track looks pretty good but overall less exciting in terms of potential.

so your saying we can build the bunk beds?

post-570-0-74859700-1301458870.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...