Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,603
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Central PA Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Well, with any April snow event, it will be elevational dependent. That's not to say there won't be any snow in the valleys, but the heaviest accumulations - should a large storm occur - would be aoa 1,200'. Once to 2kft, some problems could occur due to the weight of the snow on limbs and power lines.

The GFS ensembles have had decent hits and also duds for a few days now. The euro, not the supreme leader it used to be, is weaker and further east. But it has had strong runs (0z Sunday) which blasted the apps. The ECENS show a deep trough and some spread in low pressure position on Friday, which means a storm is still very much on the table there.

The 0z GFS is just WOW. Widespread 12"+ from IDI to JST to AOO to UNV and IPT to MPO. Lower susq would miss out on the big stuff, but still get some wet, sloppy snow.

The trough has been getting more and more impressive for a few days now, so I would suspect by tomorrow's 12z runs we should have some consensus on whether a major storm will form - but the details of track and qpf will need to be worked out until the 12z Thursday runs.

Check out the GFSens for 12z Friday:

Hour 84 from 0z ens

Error 404

on the link.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, with any April snow event, it will be elevational dependent. That's not to say there won't be any snow in the valleys, but the heaviest accumulations - should a large storm occur - would be aoa 1,200'. Once to 2kft, some problems could occur due to the weight of the snow on limbs and power lines.

The GFS ensembles have had decent hits and also duds for a few days now. The euro, not the supreme leader it used to be, is weaker and further east. But it has had strong runs (0z Sunday) which blasted the apps. The ECENS show a deep trough and some spread in low pressure position on Friday, which means a storm is still very much on the table there.

The 0z GFS is just WOW. Widespread 12"+ from IDI to JST to AOO to UNV and IPT to MPO. Lower susq would miss out on the big stuff, but still get some wet, sloppy snow.

The trough has been getting more and more impressive for a few days now, so I would suspect by tomorrow's 12z runs we should have some consensus on whether a major storm will form - but the details of track and qpf will need to be worked out until the 12z Thursday runs.

Check out the GFSens for 12z Friday:

Hour 84 from 0z ens

Excellent, thank you. i have 1 question, what are the chances that a shift north and East could put us in the mix of this?

I really inquire because we have a softball game that day....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MMM 12Z NAM is sexy for sure.

nam_namer_039_10m_wnd_precip.gif

That possible. It's showing some form of an inverted trough up west of the mtns, with a closed 700 to our west. Surface temps will be tricky in your area.

It's just odd to see the SFC low soooo far south and moving ene, and us getting much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That possible. It's showing some form of an inverted trough up west of the mtns, with a closed 700 to our west. Surface temps will be tricky in your area.

It's just odd to see the SFC low soooo far south and moving ene, and us getting much.

There is a little primary that is in WV.

f36.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent, thank you. i have 1 question, what are the chances that a shift north and East could put us in the mix of this?

I really inquire because we have a softball game that day....

A shift east and staying strong would help a bit. But again, elevation will be key to sig accums. Either way, I don't think you'd want to play in 2 to 3" of slush or 6" of wet snow!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for kicks, here's the daily April snowfall records for MDT. I assume -1 = trace. Believe it or not, there's snow entries for June 5, 1938, June 7, 1931 and July 9, 1930. WOW! (Maybe they measured dustbowl fallout back then).

post-3044-0-89851700-1301413626.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GFS has sped things up a bit. The model is usually better with WAA precip than the NAM. It almost always arrives faster than expected by a few hours. If this is the case, snow would start in the Laurels earlier in the morning and then spread east. This would support some higher totals than what I posted earlier this morning, adding 1 to 2 inches to those totals.

gfs_pcp_030m.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for kicks, here's the daily April snowfall records for MDT. I assume -1 = trace. Believe it or not, there's snow entries for June 5, 1938, June 7, 1931 and July 9, 1930. WOW! (Maybe they measured dustbowl fallout back then).

I forgot about the April 7th, 2003 snow. I went back and looked at my notes, we had 4" IMBY . 02-03 was a good year for me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I forgot about the April 7th, 2003 snow. I went back and looked at my notes, we had 4" IMBY . 02-03 was a good year for me

I remember that one. It's the only time I think I ever built a snowman and mowed on the same day. Maybe I can dig thru my pics at home to see if I have it.

I do not actually believe there was ever a true "snow" in June or July around here. Back then, maybe someone mistook hail for snow or something. But there were snow traces recorded on May 9, 1977 and May 10, 1966 when may then be the latest for actual MDT snow.

EDIT: Here's the NWS link to the daily snowfall record table.

http://www.erh.noaa.gov/ctp/climate/records_query.php?snow=1&length=All_Year&station=H&month1=03-&day1=29&submit=Table

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...