Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Potential widespread snow event for Wednesday Night through Thursday.


CoastalWx

Recommended Posts

Here's a bad bust from the NAM..lol. And also, why mid levels are important.

Here is the NAM QPF

post-33-0-26132700-1300833621.gif

Here is the 700 prog

post-33-0-46286900-1300833645.gif

Here is the radar.

post-33-0-39200000-1300833660.gif

An example of the models not giving much love to the mid level lows, but also the NAM was way too far south here.

Messengers infamous "split system".....he swore it would whiff me....12.5" later...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Here's a bad bust from the NAM..lol. And also, why mid levels are important.

Here is the NAM QPF

post-33-0-26132700-1300833621.gif

Here is the 700 prog

post-33-0-46286900-1300833645.gif

Here is the radar.

post-33-0-39200000-1300833660.gif

An example of the models not giving much love to the mid level lows, but also the NAM was way too far south here.

Ahh my fave...4 inches per hour and 16 inches in about 6 hours. Hvy hvy snow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with the amount of weenie jokes tossed around in our threads...99% of the posters being male...how should i interpret that? you all need to go take a lot of cold showers? you all are scared to come out of the closet?

I'm thinking the closets are full of blowup dolls and pocket va*inas.

Messengers infamous "split system".....he swore it would whiff me....12.5" later...

You must have been drunk on shirley temples again during a lot of that...split system didn't equal a whiff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah they cut a little back over CNE, but juiced up a bit to the south of the Pike, especially 06z-12z. It's also trying to tilt the QPF shield so it's not such a wnw-ese gradient type thing.

Didn't one of the other pros say not to use the GEFS inside of xx hour because of the inferior resolution? Or did I misremember that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking the closets are full of blowup dolls and pocket va*inas.

You must have been drunk on shirley temples again during a lot of that...split system didn't equal a whiff.

Not a whiff....but I distinctly remember that you said nw of Boston would only see light snows.

You were wrong in that respect, jut as I was wrong for not catching the split.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was awake that night and we were saying how you were sleeping through that.

yes he claims to have gotten up at 130....but that would have been the first time he was awake in history for an hour (1:30 to 2:30) and didn't post while he was getting couple inches/hr snowfall. he set his alarm too late we know the deal :thumbsup: .....no one is buying what he is selling about that nite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32/25, skied a nice line down to about 800' where the snow from yesterday was starting to thin. Held onto the 4-6" that fell yesterday from 1200' up. Popped out of the woods at the bottom of the local Sugarbush. 750 gallon collection tank needs to be emptied daily. Sap is a flowing, been a good sugaring season, much better than last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will, seems like a 3-5"/4-6" snowfall is likely here. Do you think there is a shot for the 8-12" snow that DT outlined in that first call map?

I may not be Will, but I'm more inclined to go with a 4-6" snowfall for the East Slope at this point. If the model guidance trends in favor of the more north GFS solution at 00Z, I'd be more inclined to go with an 8"+ scenario for you. The atmosphere is very cold, and ratios could be quite good for the higher elevations, especially at night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...