Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

3/23 - 3/24 Winter Storm


NEG NAO

Recommended Posts

18Z NAM very UKMET like. Has bumped liquid to .75 to 1 inch across the area and is still cold.

EDIT: Through 36 hours over an inch fromt the city nw to se in a line up through NJ PA and NY

The 18Z NAM the day before an event almost always has very high precip totals...same as the 06Z run tonight will probably come in very dry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

18Z NAM very UKMET like. Has bumped liquid to .75 to 1 inch across the area and is still cold.

EDIT: Through 36 hours over an inch fromt the city nw to se in a line up through NJ PA and NY

if the NAM is right then it looks like upton busts majorly for the areas just N and W. Obv it could just be one of those runs though....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18Z NAM very UKMET like. Has bumped liquid to .75 to 1 inch across the area and is still cold.

EDIT: Through 36 hours over an inch fromt the city nw to se in a line up through NJ PA and NY

I'm starting to think the NW suburbs need a warning, actually. Models are consistently showing over .75" QPF with temperatures cold enough for all snow. There's clearly a signal for some banding behind that coastal as well.

Dobbs Ferry is under a WWA as of 4pm. Snowman.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18Z NAM very UKMET like. Has bumped liquid to .75 to 1 inch across the area and is still cold.

EDIT: Through 36 hours over an inch fromt the city nw to se in a line up through NJ PA and NY

A significant shift north from 12z...either the northern trend has begun or the NAM and GFS are honing in on a solution that's in between the two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The height of the storm around here looks to be in the hr 24-30 time frame. During that time, the 850mb freezing line hangs around central Jersey. Aren't ratios based off of 850 temps? If so, I'm havng a hard time understanding why 6:1 - 8:1 ratios are what most people on here are thinking. 10 : 1 seems more reasonable to me, especially well west of the city.

nam_namer_027_850_temp_mslp_precip.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm starting to think the NW suburbs need a warning, actually. Models are consistently showing over .75" QPF with temperatures cold enough for all snow. There's clearly a signal for some banding behind that coastal as well.

Dobbs Ferry is under a WWA as of 4pm. Snowman.gif

I could see 4-5" on top of Mt. Zucker

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A significant shift north from 12z...either the northern trend has begun or the NAM and GFS are honing in on a solution that's in between the two.

the slp has not shifted much, the precip shield has. Temps are very cold. North trend is relative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 18Z NAM the day before an event almost always has very high precip totals...same as the 06Z run tonight will probably come in very dry.

its in line with ggem, ukmet, and euro to some extent, maybe a little wet, but not my much.

GGEM is 20 mm, UKMET is .8, euro is .70 ish

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I definitely agree on a couple major points people have brought up;

-marginal temps in later winter early spring are not very good for accumulating snow

-some portion (1/3-1/2) of the QPF falls during daylight hours, thus it will have a hard time accumulating unless precip is heavy

Both of these points considered, however, it still seems like this will be an advisory event for most (2-4/5) and a warning event for inland areas. GGEM/EURO/UK/NAM all show at least some accumulating snow (2+) for even areas close to the coast. I think as we get closer if trends continue in the direction of colder/more qpf then we could be looking at upton upgrading to advisories and warnings tomorrow morning. Its definitely a tough call and its been a while since we've seen a late season storm. I don't even know how to react since I'm already in spring mode...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see more, and I'm usually the conservative one. What is this, opposite day or something?

I think some areas in SW CT or Westchester/Putnam/Rockland will see 8-12".

Upton is just in conservative mood "because it's late March." What a BS way to forecast.

wow ballsy!thumbsupsmileyanim.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see more, and I'm usually the conservative one. What is this, opposite day or something?

I think some areas in SW CT or Westchester/Putnam/Rockland will see 8-12".

Upton is just in conservative mood "because it's late March." What a BS way to forecast.

Your the reason why I dont post here anymore. First time I poke my head in here in months and I see this. Great job mods once again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

make sure you don't chicken out, I'll be relying on your measurement when I get 7" so that it can be authenticated.

You're only about 30 minutes north of me on 287. I don't think the roads will be a porblem given the surface temps. The real problems on the roads will be up around the hills near Flanders...that's IF the NAM verifies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

..Lighten up pal, he is just making his own prediction.

People are not allowed to disagree with the NWS here? All I'm saying is they're relying too much on climo.

Same as how Monday morning was all rain according to the NWS and yet the NW suburbs ended up with 1-3". Conservative forecasting is good except when there's a clear reason to go against it. And all the models, besides the GFS, show most areas receiving a warning-criteria snowfall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to say I told you so, but you could just see how the models began to swing towards the colder solutions starting with yesterday's 12z runs. A few have bumped north but I think it's becoming pretty clear that the warmer solutions are in the minority of the solution camp at this time.

classic weenie mistake - claiming victory before the event has even started. This is why y'all get burned so often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think areas N and W of the city, especially those with elevation might see a moderate snowfall out of this. I think these areas stand the best chance of seeing temps supportive of accumulating snow. I am worried about a warm layer at 700. Surface temperatures will initially be warmer, before cooling off. This is in response to a dominant primary associated with a warm southerly wind before a coastal low takes over and north winds dominate and cool the column. I express caution with predicting large amounts in these setups because often times lots of snow accumulation is inhibited by initial melting. Still areas N and W of the city, specifically those residing N of 78 and W of 287 stand the best chance at seeing 3-7 inches of snow. The higher end of the range amounts will be primarily confined to this area and locations with elevation. I still only believe 1-3 inches of snow will fall in the city.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to say I told you so, but you could just see how the models began to swing towards the colder solutions starting with yesterday's 12z runs. A few have bumped north but I think it's becoming pretty clear that the warmer solutions are in the minority of the solution camp at this time.

your post right there could be the kiss of death, thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...