Weathergun Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 I can't believe we have a legit shot at seeing snowfall on March 23rd with an 850 low closed over Ohio I don't really believe it either. But if the 700mb and 850mb lows transfer and tightly close off quickly to the south of LI by 12z Thurs, it might happen. I'm skeptical of the NAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJwinter23 Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 I don't really believe it either. But if the 700mb and 850mb lows transfer and tightly close off quickly to the south of LI by 12z Thurs, it might happen. I'm skeptical of the NAM. It's not all that outlandish. April 2003 had this set up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmagan Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 12Z RGEM brings snow, snow/rain mix to our doorstep by 12Z Wednesday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmc10 Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 If I could lock in the 12z NAM solution....I WOULD! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 12z NAM for KMMU 110323/1400Z 50 05004KT 31.8F SNOW 20:1| 1.2|| 1.2 0.063|| 0.06 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.00 100| 0| 0 110323/1500Z 51 06006KT 31.8F SNOW 11:1| 0.9|| 2.1 0.079|| 0.14 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.00 100| 0| 0 110323/1600Z 52 04007KT 32.0F SNOW 8:1| 0.3|| 2.5 0.043|| 0.19 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.00 100| 0| 0 110323/1700Z 53 05008KT 32.0F SNOW 15:1| 0.7|| 3.2 0.051|| 0.24 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.00 100| 0| 0 110323/1800Z 54 06008KT 31.8F SNOW 12:1| 0.9|| 4.1 0.075|| 0.31 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.00 100| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 110323/1900Z 55 07008KT 32.0F SNOW 15:1| 0.9|| 5.0 0.059|| 0.37 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.00 100| 0| 0 110323/2000Z 56 08008KT 31.8F SNOW 7:1| 0.6|| 5.6 0.083|| 0.45 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.00 100| 0| 0 110323/2100Z 57 09009KT 31.6F SNOW 16:1| 0.6|| 6.2 0.039|| 0.49 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.00 100| 0| 0 110323/2200Z 58 09009KT 30.9F FZDZ 0:1| 0.0|| 6.2 0.043|| 0.54 0.00|| 0.00 0.05|| 0.05 0| 0|100 110323/2300Z 59 08009KT 30.4F FZDZ 0:1| 0.0|| 6.2 0.028|| 0.56 0.00|| 0.00 0.03|| 0.07 0| 0|100 110324/0000Z 60 07010KT 30.0F SNOW 8:1| 0.3|| 6.5 0.035|| 0.60 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.07 100| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 110324/0100Z 61 07011KT 29.8F SNOW 7:1| 0.2|| 6.8 0.035|| 0.63 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.07 100| 0| 0 110324/0200Z 62 07010KT 29.8F SNOW 7:1| 0.2|| 7.0 0.031|| 0.67 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.07 100| 0| 0 110324/0300Z 63 07011KT 30.0F SNOW 7:1| 0.5|| 7.5 0.075|| 0.74 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.07 100| 0| 0 110324/0400Z 64 08012KT 30.0F SNPL 3:1| 0.2|| 7.6 0.051|| 0.79 0.05|| 0.05 0.00|| 0.07 51| 49| 0 110324/0500Z 65 08013KT 30.0F FZRA 0:1| 0.0|| 7.6 0.055|| 0.85 0.00|| 0.05 0.06|| 0.13 0| 0|100 110324/0600Z 66 07014KT 29.8F FZRA 0:1| 0.0|| 7.6 0.020|| 0.87 0.00|| 0.05 0.02|| 0.15 0| 0|100 ----------------------------------------------+----++-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 110324/0700Z 67 07014KT 30.0F PL 0:1| 0.0|| 7.6 0.043|| 0.91 0.09|| 0.14 0.00|| 0.15 3| 97| 0 110324/0800Z 68 06014KT 30.4F SNOW 15:1| 1.7|| 9.4 0.114|| 1.02 0.00|| 0.14 0.00|| 0.15 100| 0| 0 110324/0900Z 69 05010KT 30.7F SNOW 6:1| 0.9||10.2 0.154|| 1.18 0.00|| 0.14 0.00|| 0.15 100| 0| 0 110324/1000Z 70 04010KT 30.7F SNOW 9:1| 0.7||11.0 0.079|| 1.26 0.00|| 0.14 0.00|| 0.15 100| 0| 0 110324/1100Z 71 03012KT 30.6F SNOW 8:1| 0.4||11.3 0.047|| 1.30 0.00|| 0.14 0.00|| 0.15 100| 0| 0 110324/1200Z 72 04012KT 30.6F SNOW 10:1| 0.3||11.6 0.031|| 1.33 0.00|| 0.14 0.00|| 0.15 100| 0| 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date/hour FHr Wind SfcT Ptype SRat|Snow||TotSN QPF ||TotQPF Sleet||TotPL FZRA||TotZR S%| I%| L% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 110324/1300Z 73 03012KT 30.9F SNOW 11:1| 0.2||11.9 0.024|| 1.36 0.00|| 0.14 0.00|| 0.15 100| 0| 0 110324/1400Z 74 03012KT 30.9F SNOW 14:1| 0.2||12.1 0.016|| 1.37 0.00|| 0.14 0.00|| 0.15 100| 0| 0 110324/1500Z 75 02012KT 30.9F SNOW 21:1| 0.3||12.4 0.016|| 1.39 0.00|| 0.14 0.00|| 0.15 100| 0| 0 110324/1600Z 76 01011KT 31.1F SNOW 25:1| 0.2||12.6 0.008|| 1.40 0.00|| 0.14 0.00|| 0.15 100| 0| 0 110324/1700Z 77 36011KT 31.5F SNOW 21:1| 0.1||12.7 0.004|| 1.40 0.00|| 0.14 0.00|| 0.15 100| 0| 0 110324/1800Z 78 35012KT 32.0F 0:1| 0.0||12.7 0.000|| 1.40 0.00|| 0.14 0.00|| 0.15 0| 0| 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 12z NAM KHPN 110323/1500Z 51 08004KT 35.4F RASN 0:1| 0.0|| 0.0 0.004|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.00 71| 0| 29 110323/1600Z 52 05006KT 33.6F RASN 0:1| 0.0|| 0.0 0.051|| 0.06 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.00 85| 0| 15 110323/1700Z 53 07007KT 33.3F RASN 0:1| 0.0|| 0.0 0.043|| 0.10 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.00 88| 0| 12 110323/1800Z 54 07007KT 33.1F SNOW 9:1| 0.0|| 0.0 0.020|| 0.12 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.00 90| 0| 10 ----------------------------------------------+----++-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 110323/1900Z 55 08008KT 32.5F SNOW 18:1| 0.7|| 0.7 0.039|| 0.16 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.00 100| 0| 0 110323/2000Z 56 09007KT 31.8F SNOW 10:1| 0.6|| 1.3 0.059|| 0.22 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.00 100| 0| 0 110323/2100Z 57 09008KT 31.8F SNOW 8:1| 0.2|| 1.5 0.028|| 0.24 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.00 100| 0| 0 110323/2200Z 58 09009KT 31.8F SNOW 8:1| 0.1|| 1.6 0.016|| 0.26 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.00 100| 0| 0 110323/2300Z 59 07009KT 31.6F FZDZ 0:1| 0.0|| 1.6 0.012|| 0.27 0.00|| 0.00 0.01|| 0.01 0| 0|100 110324/0000Z 60 07009KT 31.6F FZDZ 0:1| 0.0|| 1.6 0.024|| 0.30 0.00|| 0.00 0.02|| 0.04 0| 0|100 ----------------------------------------------+----++-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 110324/0100Z 61 07010KT 31.5F SNOW 8:1| 0.2|| 1.9 0.028|| 0.32 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 100| 0| 0 110324/0200Z 62 07012KT 31.6F SNOW 6:1| 0.1|| 2.0 0.020|| 0.34 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 100| 0| 0 110324/0300Z 63 08012KT 31.6F SNOW 16:1| 0.6|| 2.5 0.035|| 0.38 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 100| 0| 0 110324/0400Z 64 08013KT 31.6F SNOW 7:1| 0.4|| 2.9 0.055|| 0.43 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 100| 0| 0 110324/0500Z 65 08013KT 31.6F SNOW 7:1| 0.2|| 3.2 0.035|| 0.47 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 100| 0| 0 110324/0600Z 66 08014KT 31.6F SNOW 7:1| 0.2|| 3.4 0.035|| 0.50 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 100| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 110324/0700Z 67 07015KT 31.8F SNOW 9:1| 0.3|| 3.7 0.035|| 0.54 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 100| 0| 0 110324/0800Z 68 07015KT 31.8F SNOW 11:1| 0.5|| 4.2 0.047|| 0.59 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 100| 0| 0 110324/0900Z 69 06014KT 32.0F SNOW 14:1| 1.7|| 5.9 0.118|| 0.70 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 100| 0| 0 110324/1000Z 70 05012KT 32.2F SNOW 8:1| 1.2|| 7.1 0.142|| 0.85 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 100| 0| 0 110324/1100Z 71 04012KT 32.0F SNOW 14:1| 1.2|| 8.4 0.087|| 0.93 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 100| 0| 0 110324/1200Z 72 04013KT 31.5F SNOW 18:1| 1.0|| 9.3 0.055|| 0.99 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 100| 0| 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date/hour FHr Wind SfcT Ptype SRat|Snow||TotSN QPF ||TotQPF Sleet||TotPL FZRA||TotZR S%| I%| L% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 110324/1300Z 73 03013KT 31.1F SNOW 11:1| 0.6|| 9.9 0.051|| 1.04 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 100| 0| 0 110324/1400Z 74 02013KT 31.1F SNOW 15:1| 0.4||10.3 0.028|| 1.07 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 100| 0| 0 110324/1500Z 75 01012KT 31.5F SNOW 19:1| 0.3||10.6 0.016|| 1.08 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 100| 0| 0 110324/1600Z 76 36012KT 32.2F SNOW 23:1| 0.2||10.8 0.008|| 1.09 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 100| 0| 0 110324/1700Z 77 35012KT 32.5F SNOW 23:1| 0.1||10.9 0.004|| 1.09 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 100| 0| 0 110324/1800Z 78 35012KT 32.5F SNOW 22:1| 0.1||11.0 0.004|| 1.10 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 100| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 110324/1900Z 79 34012KT 33.1F 0:1| 0.0||11.0 0.000|| 1.10 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 0| 0| 0 110324/2000Z 80 34012KT 34.0F 0:1| 0.0||11.0 0.000|| 1.10 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 0| 0| 0 110324/2100Z 81 33012KT 34.2F 0:1| 0.0||11.0 0.000|| 1.10 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 0| 0| 0 110324/2200Z 82 33012KT 33.8F 0:1| 0.0||11.0 0.000|| 1.10 0.00|| 0.00 0.00|| 0.04 0| 0| 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tornadojay Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 fwiw... KEWR and KLGA seem to be in the 8-9 inch range per 12Z NAM Bufkit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Some high resolution NAM maps for the morning crew Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Oh man...it was only a matter of time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Compared to it's 00z run, the 12z GFS is much colder already through 42 hrs..further south with the surface low, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Compared to it's 00z run, the 12z GFS is much colder already through 42 hrs..further south with the surface low, too. Noticed that too. March going out like a lion. Cold this weekend may be equally big story. Was it 80 72 hours ago? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJwinter23 Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 12z gfs coming in a little warmer at 850 through hr 45 compared to 12z nam. 0c line Bradford, PA to Atlantic City, NJ but as John has pointed out, it is colder than it's 00z run thus far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJwinter23 Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Noticed that too. March going out like a lion. Cold this weekend may be equally big story. Was it 80 72 hours ago? Ah that aint nothin. You guys remember March 2007 when we were 80 degrees, then picked up 6" of sleet in the low 20s a day or 2 later? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tornadojay Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 looks like the 850 zero line is right through NYC at 57 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 GFS is still warm at 57 hours..and further north with the surface low Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU848789 Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Oh man...it was only a matter of time Here's my analysis: Wow! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmc10 Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 GFS is still warm at 57 hours..and further north with the surface low Still, drastic changes from 0z. It is heading in the right direction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Still, drastic changes from 0z. It is heading in the right direction. Yes, compared to 0z. But 6z GFS was much colder and much more south. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Ah that aint nothin. You guys remember March 2007 when we were 80 degrees, then picked up 6" of sleet in the low 20s a day or 2 later? Sure do. Also remember mid 90s in April 2002 followed by 40s a few days later. GFS does look colder than 00z but would likely limit meaningful snow to n-nj. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tornadojay Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 it is definitely colder.. very close call now, per GFS.. 850 zero line really doesn't make it too far north of the city and then it retreats back south again.. surface temps don't look terrible either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris L Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 any chance that the NAM is running too cold? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEG NAO Posted March 21, 2011 Author Share Posted March 21, 2011 I don't understand why some folks here think its not possible to have a snowstorm on March 24 with 12 + inches - its happened before later then 3/24 - set up has to be near perfect and we are heading in that direction..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rjay Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Troll alert. Yes, I must be a troll bc i disagree with your over the top take on the 6z gfs....it didn't show anything like u said it did.....12z nam looks wow tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmc10 Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Yes, compared to 0z. But 6z GFS was much colder and much more south. Yea well until the GFS stops with this primary lp non sense, it will continue to be warmer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 this is awesome.....im sitting this one out but watching from the bench. some fun tracking to close out....errr, begin spring. thx guys! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTrials Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 any chance that the NAM is running too cold? Probably both, GFS too warm and nam too cold, so somewhere in the middle seems about right at this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Very nice setup, espeically just west of the city. I'm going with a forecast of 7-14" for now for my back yard. My thinking is 9-12" seems most likely but I wouldn't be suprised to see 7" or 14" for that matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Would think WS watches should be flying very soon north and west of LI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 any chance that the NAM is running too cold? As TheTrials said, more often than not the NAM is too cold and the GFS a bit too warm in these scenarios. So take a middle ground and you probably have a reasonable forecast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pazzo83 Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Very nice setup, espeically just west of the city. I'm going with a forecast of 7-14" for now for my back yard. My thinking is 9-12" seems most likely but I wouldn't be suprised to see 7" or 14" for that matter. Is this the official Pompton Plains forecast? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.