Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

March 27 SpringBlizzard Discussion


Ji

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 925
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Looks like just north of town may be the winners. And I posted this in the Richmond thread, but I'll post here as well just to put this possibility into some perspective since some accumulation might take place officially at the airport.

Top 15 Late Season Snowstorms at RIC (after March 15th since 1898)

1. 10.0" April 3-4, 1915

2. 8.4" March 26, 1971

3. 7.8" March 20, 1914

4. 6.9" March 27-28, 1947

5. 6.4" March 24-25, 1906

6. 6.0" March 30-31, 1964

7. 5.9" March 16, 1950

8. 5.4" March 21-22, 1943

9. 4.7" March 16, 1960

10. 4.5" March 25-26, 1906

11. 4.3" March 21-22, 1943

12. 3.6" March 22, 1914

13. 3.4" March 31, 1907

14. 3.0" March 21, 1909

15. 2.8" March 20-21, 1908

Here are some additional late season measurable snowfall at RIC

1.4" March 21-22, 1973

0.9" March 21-22, 2006

0.7" March 16, 1987 and March 20, 1944

0.5" March 24-25, 1940

0.3" March 29, 1984

0.2" March 18-19, 1981 and March 23, 1934

There was an April snowstorm listed above in the Top 15 but, here are the rest of the April snowstorms recorded RIC since 1898.

2.7" April 12, 1918

2.0" April 12, 1940 and April 28, 1898 (latest measurable snow on record)

1.2" April 1, 1964 and April 13, 1957

1.0" April 7, 2007

0.6" April 7, 1971

0.2" April 7, 1990, April 9, 1982, April 21, 1953, and April 16, 1935

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DT's first call might actually verify....

i think im still in his 2-4" zone though the 1" line is maybe a mile away. he's still too high in that zone i think. 3-6 all the way to the bay? eh.. we'll see. it's not terribly cold ahead of this, temps will be falling as precip gets going.. unless you get heavy snow accumulation is going to be slow. i think most all his contour areas are one "notch" too high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think im still in his 2-4" zone though the 1" line is maybe a mile away. he's still too high in that zone i think. 3-6 all the way to the bay? eh.. we'll see. it's not terribly cold ahead of this, temps will be falling as precip gets going.. unless you get heavy snow accumulation is going to be slow. i think most all his contour areas are one "notch" too high.

I completely agree, mabye there will be some areas that get in on some radiational cooling before the overcast moves in. I know I will.

Mount Holly issued a WWA for southern DE, it's like DC is barely out of it aswell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks better than I would of imagined. Most of the banding would pass through DC if extrapolated.

True but extrapolation isn't straightforward from there as you have to take into account our "squash" assuming the stuff that is involved with the snow is the MO batch, as the convective batch though looking nice is going into S VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18z NAM

MRB 0.0

OKV .04 all snow

DCA .17 all snow

IAD .15 all snow

EZF .20 all snow

RIC .72 all snow

SHD .27 all snow

LYH .78 all snow

ROA .55 snow and .42PL

What kind of ratios do you think we are looking at here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying to build up some excitement for the possible one inch......

deadhorse.gif

AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION...CORRECTED

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BALTIMORE MD/WASHINGTON DC

553 PM EDT SAT MAR 26 2011

.SYNOPSIS...

LOW PRESSURE WILL PASS BY TO THE SOUTH LATE TONIGHT INTO SUNDAY.

CANADIAN HIGH PRESSURE WILL BUILD OVERHEAD FOR THE EARLY PORTION OF

NEXT WEEK. LOW PRESSURE MAY IMPACT THE REGION DURING THE MIDDLE

PORTION OF NEXT WEEK.

&&

.NEAR TERM /THROUGH SUNDAY/...

JUST WANTED TO UPDATE THE DSCN...AT THIS TIME DON'T SEE A NEED TO

DO A CHG TO THE ZNS. I DO THINK THE MAJORITY...IF NOT ALL...OF THE

PCPN IS DONE BY NOON SUNDAY. ONE THING I LOOKED AT IS ROAD TEMPS -

ATTM MD ROAD TEMPS ARE IN THE L60S IN WRN WD...IN THE M60S AT THE

JUNCTION OF I-95/495. LOOKED AT A 24 HR HISTORY TO SEE HOW MUCH

THOSE COULD EXPECT TO FALL - YDA WRN MD ROADS GOT INTO THE 50S BUT

DROPPED TO THE L30S...WHILE 95/495 GOT INTO THE 70S AND DROPPED TO

THE M40S. THIS WL OBVIOUSLY PLAY A ROLE WHEN SNOW FALLS IN THE

METRO AREA - IT'S GOING TO TAKE TIME B4 ANY CAN ACCUMULATE ON

ROADS.

I DON'T FEEL THE NEED TO PUSH THE ADVSRY FURTHER N AT THIS TIME.

PRSNTLY AIR TEMPS IN THE M40S...EVEN U40S AT CHO WHERE THERE IS A

BETTER THREAT OF ACCUMULATING SNOWS. ON THE OTHER HAND DWPTS ARE

GNRLY IN THE TEENS...AND W/ A LARGE ARCTIC HIGH N OF LAKE SUPERIOR

A STEADY FLOW OF DRY AIR WL OCCUR. SO ALONG THE LN FM DC-BALT BLV

THERE WL BE A PD OF SVRL HRS OF SNOWFALL BTWN 2 AM AND 10 AM...BUT

CONFIDENCE THAT THERE COULD BE ADVSRY LVLS REACHED (2") ISN'T

HIGH.

REGRADING THE "HOW RARE IS THIS" QUSTN...ON 4/7/2007 DC RCVD

.4"...AND IN THE LAST 50 YRS FM MID MAR TO LATE APR DC HAS RCVD

0.1" OF MORE 15 TIMES...SO A 30% CHC. BALT HAS HAD THAT OCCUR 26

TIMES IN LAST 50 YRS...SO ABT A 50% CHC OF OCCURRENCE.

PRVS DSCN...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, RNK went 2-4 here-- 4 very possible higher elevations but I doubt I see that in here at 1k feet. This thought is reflected in their snow map as well--so we are on the same page.

NAM has quite the burst of snow here Midnight to 3 or so-- something like that. We will see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

REGRADING THE "HOW RARE IS THIS" QUSTN...ON 4/7/2007 DC RCVD

.4"...AND IN THE LAST 50 YRS FM MID MAR TO LATE APR DC HAS RCVD

0.1" OF MORE 15 TIMES...SO A 30% CHC. BALT HAS HAD THAT OCCUR 26

TIMES IN LAST 50 YRS...SO ABT A 50% CHC OF OCCURRENCE.

PRVS DSCN...

mid-march.. that's adding almost 2 weeks of snow chances that have already passed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Climo isn't important at this stage.

sure it is. if this was feb 1 we might get the whole qpf as accum. plus if you want a more accurate "how rare" you dont include 2 weeks which have already passed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sure it is. if this was feb 1 we might get the whole qpf as accum. plus if you want a more accurate "how rare" you dont include 2 weeks which have already passed.

Why wouldn't we get everything as accumulating QPF now? Lows have been in the 20's two nights in a row, so ground temps are somewhat cold. Its also falling at night.

So if its JAN 30th, and we have the exact same "scenario" ground/air temps in all aspects, how would climo factor in then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...