Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Japan Nuclear Crisis Part II


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Has anyone thought about whether there may be damage to the racks in the spent fuel pools? I mean, reactor #3 looks terrible from the outside and had a pretty massive explosion.

I've been wondering about the same secondary and tertiary damage from the first hydrogen explosion, and those after.

By no means am I even remotely knowledge of explosive shock-waves, but I ponder how much of the seals, pipes, supports, racks, and 40 year old, likely corroded containment shells were damaged or fatigued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Radiation Found on NBC News Crew, Lester Holt

By Alex Weprin on March 16, 2011 1:46 PM

Yesterday we reported that TV news crews were on the move due to fears of radiation exposure. Today we saw the first example of why those moves were made.

On “Today” this morning, NBC News anchor Lester Holt revealed that he and his crew tested positive for small traces of radiation after returning to his hotel from spending time in the field.

Luckily, as Holt explains, the amount of radiation he was exposed to was very small. His shoes, however, will not be coming back to the U.S. after his trip ends.

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/radiation-found-on-nbc-news-crew-lester-holt_b57729#

I don't remember this being posted but if it was, disregard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be drone imagery. Not sure when or if global hawk has hit the site tho.

MSNBC reporting an earlier over-flight by an unmanned spy plane. I wonder if that's where some of the NRC's statements came from.

So Unit 5 has 900-something spent fuel rods and the coolant temp is up 5C to 64C and Unit 6 has 876 spent fuel rods and the temp is at 60C. (NHK)

I heard that on my phone was it live?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been wondering about the same secondary and tertiary damage from the first hydrogen explosion, and those after.

By no means am I even remotely knowledge of explosive shock-waves, but I ponder how much of the seals, pipes, supports, racks, and 40 year old, likely corroded containment shells were damaged or fatigued.

During refueling operations, there is an absolute flurry of activity related to scheduled piping changeouts....radiographic "x-raying" of piping, valves, and other components...and general intensive inspections and testing. If cracks/damage are found during the scheduled piping radiography, they are replaced, right then and there. Thickness measurements are documented for the entire pipe, and ANY new blemishes are either noted or deemed significant enough to just replace the entire section of pipe. Every bolt on every pipe is tightened with torque wrenches per insanely detailed procedures.

This, at least from my experience, is what takes place in the US nuclear facilities. I assume such standards are similar throughout most of the developed world..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I have to say is bring on the wind turbines and solar cells. I was a proponent of nuke, but I have changed my tune with what I have learned this past week.

Humans have proven themselves time and time again to be incapable of handling things like nuclear power. Who doesn't plan for a tsunami when building a nuke plant with six reactors right there on the Japanese coastline?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read a report on another site but have no link that ABC News is pulling their crews out of Japan.

Breaking on abcnews.com

"U.S. officials are alarmed at how the Japanese are handling the escalating nuclear reactor crisis and fear that if they do not get control of the plants within the next 24 to 48 hours they could have a situation that will be "deadly for decades."

"It would be hard to describe how alarming this is right now," one U.S. official told ABC News."

"They need to stop pulling out people—and step up with getting them back in the reactor to cool it. There is a recognition this is a suicide mission," the official said. "The U.S. official says experts believe there is a rupture in two, maybe three of the six reactors at the Fukushima power plant, but as worrisome is the fact that spent fuel rods are now exposed to the air, which means that substances like cesium, which have a long half-life, could become airborne. "That could be deadly for decades," the official said. There is a growing concern around the world that a nuclear catastrophic disaster is in the works.

"There is talk of an apocalypse and I think the word is particularly well chosen," European Union's energy commissioner Günther Oettinger said today, according to various reports. "Practically everything is out of control. I cannot exclude the worst in the hours and days to come."

Chu's assessment is in line with views expressed by many experts, some of whom even believe the Japan crisis could be worse than the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster in Ukraine that left hundreds sick and killed several from radiation

Something is up, the Japanese keep saying no big deal while everyone else is bailing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MSNBC reporting an earlier over-flight by an unmanned spy plane. I wonder if that's where some of the NRC's statements came from.

could be. it was posted they would use it to check out the plant so it would make sense. the imaging on the global hawk is better than any one satellite and higher resolution... it should be able to uncover some previous unknowns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

During refueling operations, there is an absolute flurry of activity related to scheduled piping changeouts....radiographic "x-raying" of piping, valves, and other components...and general intensive inspections and testing. If cracks/damage are found during the scheduled piping radiography, they are replaced, right then and there. Thickness measurements are documented for the entire pipe, and ANY new blemishes are either noted or deemed significant enough to just replace the entire section of pipe. Every bolt on every pipe is tightened with torque wrenches per insanely detailed procedures.

This, at least from my experience, is what takes place in the US nuclear facilities. I assume such standards are similar throughout most of the developed world..

Yeah, but as seems to always happen in cases like this corners are cut, sections of pipe that should be replaced are not because some bean-counter needs to cut maintenance costs...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Breaking on abcnews.com

"U.S. officials are alarmed at how the Japanese are handling the escalating nuclear reactor crisis and fear that if they do not get control of the plants within the next 24 to 48 hours they could have a situation that will be "deadly for decades."

"It would be hard to describe how alarming this is right now," one U.S. official told ABC News."

"They need to stop pulling out people—and step up with getting them back in the reactor to cool it. There is a recognition this is a suicide mission," the official said. "The U.S. official says experts believe there is a rupture in two, maybe three of the six reactors at the Fukushima power plant, but as worrisome is the fact that spent fuel rods are now exposed to the air, which means that substances like cesium, which have a long half-life, could become airborne. "That could be deadly for decades," the official said. There is a growing concern around the world that a nuclear catastrophic disaster is in the works.

"There is talk of an apocalypse and I think the word is particularly well chosen," European Union's energy commissioner Günther Oettinger said today, according to various reports. "Practically everything is out of control. I cannot exclude the worst in the hours and days to come."

Chu's assessment is in line with views expressed by many experts, some of whom even believe the Japan crisis could be worse than the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster in Ukraine that left hundreds sick and killed several from radiation

Something is up, the Japanese keep saying no big deal while everyone else is bailing.

at least we'll be able to recall the day when chernobyl was king.. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/03/16/japan.nuclear.heroes/index.html?iref=allsearch

We are in totally uncharted waters, people are ad-libbing to deal with the situation," he said. "Using fire trucks to pump a mixture of sea water and boron onto the reactors is not in any of the manuals

In case nobody posted it ealier they're F***. All options have failed and they're improvising desperation stradegies now.

Also I wouldn't call the workers Heros just yet.... They may have mishandeled the plant during the quake and helped cause this disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also I wouldn't call the workers Heros just yet.... They may have mishandeled the plant during the quake and helped cause this disaster.

It's certainly possible the direction of work was mismanaged from the get go, but i'd consider any laborers sticking it out to the bitter end heros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/03/16/japan.nuclear.heroes/index.html?iref=allsearch

In case nobody posted it ealier they're F***. All options have failed and they're improvising desperation stradegies now.

Also I wouldn't call the workers Heros just yet.... They may have mishandeled the plant during the quake and helped cause this disaster.

They are doing the same sort of things tried at Chernobyl. None of this is in the operating manual handed over by the builder when the plant turns on, but it is based on the limited experience we have in disasters like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but as seems to always happen in cases like this corners are cut, sections of pipe that should be replaced are not because some bean-counter needs to cut maintenance costs...

From my own experience....cutting corners (wrt critical systems) is almost impossible, and is certainly not of much value (when assessing risk). During shutdowns/refueling outages, there are no shortage of regulatory personnel on site, not to mention that the cost of one section of pipe/valve/<insert component> is equivelant to about 3 seconds of revenue generated by the plant.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's certainly possible the direction of work was mismanaged from the get go, but i'd consider any laborers sticking it out to the bitter end heros.

It is almost certain months or years from now it will be revealed that mistakes were made and corners were cut. Tragedies like this usually have a human error component.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From my own experience....cutting corners (wrt critical systems) is almost impossible. During shutdowns/refueling outages, there are no shortage of regulatory personnel on site, not to mention that the cost of one section of pipe/valve/<insert component> is equivelant to about 3 seconds of revenue generated by the plant.....

Sounds like what is probably said by folks building oil pipelines or maintaining aircraft before they explode or crash, respectively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

at least we'll be able to recall the day when chernobyl was king.. ;)

Oh my god, the first few minutes of Abc news just now was horrifying.

"heading for the worst"..."can a suicide mission by workers save it or is too late"

same quotes I posted a few minutes over:

"teethering on the brink of a multi-reactor meltdown"...

"my father has accepted his fate....much like a death sentence" from the daughter of one of the workers.

"USA urgently trying to get the Japese to find more volunteers to go into the reactors to try and stop multiple nuclear meltdowns, the next 48 hours are absolutely critical...there is recognition that this is a suicide mission"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is almost certain months or years from now it will be revealed that mistakes were made and corners were cut. Tragedies like this usually have a human error component.

Sure, all i'm saying is those mistakes were probably above the pay grade of your average front line grunt giving his life right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

During refueling operations, there is an absolute flurry of activity related to scheduled piping changeouts....radiographic "x-raying" of piping, valves, and other components...and general intensive inspections and testing. If cracks/damage are found during the scheduled piping radiography, they are replaced, right then and there. Thickness measurements are documented for the entire pipe, and ANY new blemishes are either noted or deemed significant enough to just replace the entire section of pipe. Every bolt on every pipe is tightened with torque wrenches per insanely detailed procedures.

This, at least from my experience, is what takes place in the US nuclear facilities. I assume such standards are similar throughout most of the developed world..

Thank you for sharing your knowledge of the process.

So, to your understanding, what could be damaged by the back end pressure release of the hydrogen explosions which have already occurred? I mean, if given the choice, would you have felt comfortable standing in a steel box at the base of one of those buildings, knowing there was going to be an explosion like the ones we've viewed?

I don't mean to appear alarming. I'm simply trying to discern the strength and potential damage those explosions caused (some of which we may not even know about, until they get power reconnected) to the rest of the buildings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...