Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,600
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

march 5-7 potential heavy rain event


earthlight

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 317
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I just might take down my christmas decorations that were burried in snow since January before this next event comes in. They were finaly uncovered last week. :lol:

lol ... yea, I hear ya'.. might be a good opportunity to do that... I think the last thing I want to deal with is a heavy, wet snow.. I have a horrible snow blower and I'll end up having to shovel a pile of slop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EXTENDED FORECAST DISCUSSION

NWS HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL PREDICTION CENTER CAMP SPRINGS MD

227 PM EST THU MAR 03 2011

VALID 12Z SUN MAR 06 2011 - 12Z THU MAR 10 2011

SOME DETAILS HAVE CHANGED OVER THE PAST DAY BUT OVERALL THERE IS

GOOD CONTINUITY AND AGREEMENT WITH THE AMPLIFIED BUT PROGRESSIVE

PATTERN FCST TO PREVAIL OVER THE CONUS DURING THE MEDIUM RANGE

PERIOD. BETTER THAN AVERAGE CLUSTERING OF GUIDANCE WITH LARGE

SCALE FEATURES FAVORS MAINTAINING A BLEND OF OPERATIONAL AND

ENSEMBLE MEAN SOLNS.

EARLY IN THE FORECAST PERIOD...A WAVY SYSTEM OVER THE EASTERN

CONUS WILL BRING A THREAT OF EXCESSIVE PRECIPITATION INTO THE

NORTHERN MID-ATLANTIC REGION AND NORTHEAST...WITH SNOW POSSIBLE

WITHIN THE NORTHERN FRINGE OF THE PRECIPITATION SHIELD OVER THE

NORTHERN OHIO RIVER VALLEY...APPALACHIANS...AND LOWER GREAT LAKES.

THERE ARE ALREADY MEANINGFUL DIFFS IN THE LATTER HALF OF THE

SHORT RANGE TIME FRAME WITH THIS SYSTEM...AND THESE DIFFS CONTINUE

INTO THE MEDIUM RANGE. THE 00Z ECMWF IS WELL NWD OF THE 00Z GFS

WITH THE PRIMARY WAVE THAT AFFECTS THE NORTHEAST SUN-MON BUT BOTH

MODELS ARE WITHIN THE BROAD ENVELOPE OF POTENTIAL MODEL/ENSEMBLE

SOLNS. THE 12Z GFS/ECMWF BOTH SUGGEST THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SECOND

SURFACE LOW FARTHER SOUTH...OVER THE SOUTHEAST...WHICH WOULD

PROLONG PRECIP ACROSS THE EASTERN U.S. ON DAY 3/SUNDAY. IT WILL

LIKELY TAKE ANOTHER DAY OR SO TO RESOLVE IMPORTANT SMALLER SCALE

DETAILS ALOFT SO A GENERAL COMPROMISE APPEARS TO BE THE BEST

OPTION UNTIL BETTER CLUSTERING DEVELOPS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rivers have had a few days to fall and are now only slightly above normal. I'm beginning to think that even with a 2.5" rain we should avoid anything more than minor flooding. Although, If the lower hudson Valley and NW NJ manage to get a decent snowpack back, and the cutoff low materializes next week we could have some major hydrology issues. In 84, the big flood was preceded by a few smaller floods, and that could be the case again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18Z NAM is getting closer to the time range of any potential snow.. tough to say how it might extrapolate.. it doesn't seem to be emphasizing too much of redevelopment like the Euro and GFS.

Big differences on the 18z NAM vs the 12z NAM which are leading to a faster progression of the front, and thus the secondary wave is not develped in time.

12z NAM hr 84

nam_500_084s.gif

vs 18z NAM hr 78

nam_500_078s.gif

hr 84, the trough turns negitive too late and the flow is too progressive to bring excessive QPF to our region. It's the 18z NAM and it's at the end of its range so I guess its best to take its solution with a grane of salt.

nam_500_084s.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you take the new NAM and make it just a tad more progressive, our area is going to get crushed. Right now heaviest QPF is just to our west.

Today's 12z models so far, NAM, RSM and ETA are all focusing more on the developing low pressure in the south. They are pretty much taking away the front deluge now and have all the energy wrapping into the developing low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NAM is very slow with its progression.. would be a lot of rain for somebody.. no cold air to be found either.. even northern new england doesn't see much in the way of frozen stuff with the NAM solution.

If you take the idea that the GFS is too fast and that the NAM is too slow that puts us right in the bullseye. I tend to think that a more wrapped up low is the way to go, with lots of QPF as the GFS first indicated days ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...