goknights Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 0z NAM looks like weak sauce. DLL with another perfect call?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moneyman Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 LOW is about the same strength as 18z NAM, just a bit farther SE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prinsburg_wx Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 0z NAM looks like weak sauce. DLL with another perfect call?? early call but looking more & more the ukie will be the winner on this as it's track has not budged in days compared to the others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moneyman Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goknights Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Moneyman, how do surface temps look for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 early call but looking more & more the ukie will be the winner on this as it's track has not budged in days compared to the others. funny you post about that as I was just looking at its 12z run.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moneyman Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 0c line gets to Appelton or so. I'll know the full soundings (850, 900 etc) in about 20-25 minutes probably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 0c line gets to Appelton or so. I'll know the full soundings (850, 900 etc) in about 20-25 minutes probably. you can get soundings now on twisterdata. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goknights Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 My guess is that La Crosse will go with a low end warning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 0c line gets to Appelton or so. I'll know the full soundings (850, 900 etc) in about 20-25 minutes probably. Looks like you're all snow by 15z Wednesday. Before that is iffy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moneyman Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Meh: HR 36: 33.1 (2M) -1.3 (850) -0.2 (875) 0.1 (900) 1.6 (925) -1.3 (950) 0.15 QPF HR 39: 32.7 (2M) -1.5 (850) -0.8 (875) -0.3 (900) 0.2 (925) -0.8 (950) 0.22 QPF HR 42: 32.5 (2M) -1.0 (850) -0.7 (875) -1.4 (900) -1.6 (925) -1.1 (950) 0.16 QPF HR 45: 33.1 (2M) -0.6 (850) 0.0 (875) -0.1 (900) -1.3 (925) -0.6 (950) 0.09 QPF Would be some heavy wet snow, that's for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goknights Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Moneyman where do you get your soundings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moneyman Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 http://68.226.77.253/text/NAM212/NAM212_Kfld.txt Updates for the 0z and 12z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daddylonglegs Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Money Whats your call on totals? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goknights Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 4.8 inches for you frank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prinsburg_wx Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 still some big differences at hr 36...nam has L in se IA...the normally north rgem has it in c IL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moneyman Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 5-7 for DLL 2-5 for here North of a Appelton line, 5-7 as well. After the GFS and other models come up, I'll have a detailed prediction. But you are looking good for at least 5 inches or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daddylonglegs Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 I'm sticking with 3 inches You see the 18z GFS? It was weak here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daddylonglegs Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 That area in NE WI looks good for heavy snows... I think warm air is going to kill totals here.. just a hunch. I'll send you some dirty magazines if i get over 6 inches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moneyman Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 18z GFS had .48 QPF for you. 8-10:1 ratios would still be around 4-5 inches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daddylonglegs Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Yeah.. depends on if most of that is sleet or snow or maybe even rain In that Badger/Ohio game, they should have started taking guys out at the knees and biting... You can let them shoot like that from 3 pt land. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone77 Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 I'm sticking with 3 inches You see the 18z GFS? It was weak here. I'd go with 4-7" for La Crosse. You'll probably end up on the high side of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moneyman Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 0z RGEM hr 48: Wonder what hr 42 looks like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prinsburg_wx Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 0z RGEM hr 48: Wonder what hr 42 looks like. 42 rgem...48 total for FLD 0.44 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksstormhunter Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Hey guys, just looking at my latest guidance still tracking NC Kansas with the greatest potential for snowfall is in the Hill City, KS area. Seeing snowfall rates of up to 2" per hour around the 18Z time frame, this looks like the heaviest periods of snow. Also add to that a bit of wind up to 20-25 knots, will see some reduced visibility with blowing snow. Uploaded city specific forecast for that area. Any thought on the snow and track of the Low. For you guys across the WI areas, I am going with 9.7" for the Lacrosse area, not looking for a prolonged event, this one is going to come hard and fast, tracking about a 3 hour window of 1.1"+ snow rates for you guys. Any additional thoughts on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 still some big differences at hr 36...nam has L in se IA...the normally north rgem has it in c IL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Looks like you're all snow by 15z Wednesday. Before that is iffy. Surface temps are marginal, but if we can get it a couple of degrees colder and most of it falls before noon Thursday, the NAM gets us very close. Keep chipping away... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone77 Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 0z GFS coming in colder and farther SE. Seems like that has been the trend recently. Yeah it's been sort of an odd trend the last few weeks. Of course the pattern is basically the same, so I guess that kind of makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 42 rgem...48 total for FLD 0.44 any chance you could put up 850mb temp maps for 36 and 42hr? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TugHillMatt Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Yeah it's been sort of an odd trend the last few weeks. Of course the pattern is basically the same, so I guess that kind of makes sense. But the snow line doesn't seem to be following suit very much... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.