Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,566
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Monty
    Newest Member
    Monty
    Joined

Feb. 23-25th Winter Storm Part 2


Chicago Storm

Recommended Posts

A lot of reasons--but convection played a huge role--so it does seem it was not negative convective feedback that the NCEP (NAM/GFS) were hitting on. It was such a tough forecast for this reason. We knew convection would play a role in strong pressure falls--just how much that would "drive" storm track was unclear. It does seem convection is playing a large role with this storm heading a bit more E though.

speak of the devil. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 749
  • Created
  • Last Reply

A lot of reasons--but convection played a huge role--so it does seem it was not negative convective feedback that the NCEP (NAM/GFS) were hitting on. It was such a tough forecast for this reason. We knew convection would play a role in strong pressure falls--just how much that would "drive" storm track was unclear. It does seem convection is playing a large role with this storm heading a bit more E though.

Makes sense. I thought the more convection the better chance it would go more north because I thought convection might signal strength. Thanks for the input

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was a much more vigorous upper level system that was able to curl the sfc system NW as it intensified. H5 with this system is fairly meager, which has allowed that deep convection developing over the lower MS valley to dictate the direction of the sfc low. That's my layman's interpretation of what b_i was saying yesterday. Maybe he could illuminate you further.

No illuminating needed. You pretty much said it. The upper level wave configuration was completely different and that system was a partial phase job with a deep elongated polar vortex intruding into the CONUS. That storm was essentially a deepening negative tilt longwave trough after phasing with a boatload more of potential energy and much deeper tropospheric deep baroclinity. This is mainly an upper tropospheric wave, positive tilt, with a much "shallower" overall depth that the groundhog storm. The groundhog day storm had the mother of all coupled jet circulations too--historic storm for a reason. The potential energy with this storm--as impressive as it is--is probably an order of magnitude less than the GroundHogs Day beast.

post-999-0-76442300-1298595639.png

post-999-0-41376300-1298595641.gif

post-999-0-91423500-1298595642.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Makes sense. I thought the more convection the better chance it would go more north because I thought convection might signal strength. Thanks for the input

Well were this negative tilt it would have been different--but strong pressure falls along the triple point/warm front (this surface low will track along the warm front essentially with only minimal lifting of the front--mainly as the storm heads eastward and the upper wave amplifies a bit more) associated with convection means this takes a more latitudinal track than a meridional track since negative tilt storms typically have warm fronts/advection patterns that develop much farther N and even wrap around the system if the storm is intense enough (TROWAL = Trough Of Warm Air Aloft).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well were this negative tilt it would have been different--but strong pressure falls along the triple point/warm front (this surface low will track along the warm front essentially with only minimal lifting of the front--mainly as the storm heads eastward and the upper wave amplifies a bit more) associated with convection means this takes a more latitudinal track than a meridional track since negative tilt storms typically have warm fronts/advection patterns that develop much farther N and even wrap around the system if the storm is intense enough (TROWAL).

So basically the lack of a northern stream or energy is not allowing this to go negative. Also it's taking longer to intensify which is lamens terms for why it's going more east. The more in depth info explains the reasoning behind that. So much going on it's hard to process it all. Appreciate the reasoning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE QUAD CITIES IA IL

718 PM CST THU FEB 24 2011.

UPDATE...

SENT UPDATE TO LOWER SNOW AMOUNTS. FIRST PROBLEM IS MASSIVE DRY WEDGE SEEN ON KDVN 00Z RAOB AND STRENGTHENING LOW LEVEL NORTHEAST WINDS... WHICH HAS KEPT SNOW AT BAY FOR MUCH OF THE AREA. HAVE BEEN SEEING SNOW INCREASE FROM NEAR TO SOUTH OF KCID TO KAWG IN REGION OF STRONG 600 MB FRONTOGENETICAL FORCING... AND SOME MOSTLY LIGHTER SNOW INTO SOUTHEAST IA AND NORTHEAST MO AHEAD OF 850 MB AND 700 MB LOWS IN PERSISTENT WARM ADVECTION. PROBLEM THERE IS TEMPS HAVE BEEN AT OR JUST ABOVE FREEZING MARK THUS SNOW UNLESS HEAVY HAS BEEN MELTING OR COMPACTING IF ANY ACCUM. ANOTHER PROBLEM IS MAIN MOIST CONVEYOR EXPECTED TO FEED SIGNIFICANT SNOWFALL CONTINUES SHIFTING EASTWARD THROUGH DOWNSTATE IL... AS SUPPORTED BY PRESSURE FALLS... AND NOT MOVING NORTHWARD THUS CWA IS MISSING THE STRONGEST MOISTURE FEED. EVEN SO... WILL SEE SNOW MOST OF AREA BETWEEN COMBINATION OF MID LEVEL FRONTOGENESIS AND DEFORMATION SWEEPING THROUGH SOUTHEAST 1/2 TO 2/3 OF CWA... WITH SNOW MODERATE TO LOCALLY HEAVY AT TIMES. BUT DUE TO SLOWER ONSET...BETTER MOISTURE AND DYNAMICS SOUTH...HAVE LOWERED SNOW AMOUNTS AND WILL BE WATCHING TRENDS FOR NEEDING TO POSSIBLY LOWER SOME MORE. INCREASINGLY CONCERNED THAT COMBINATION OF VERY DRY AIR 900-700 MB AND WEAKENING MID LEVEL FRONTOGENESIS MAY RESULT IN NOT MUCH IN WAY OF SNOW FOR AREAS FROM QUAD CITIES NORTHEASTWARD. HAVE CANCELLED ADVISORY FOR CARROLL COUNTY. RADAR TRENDS BEARING OUT THE SNOW/NO SNOW LINEFROM JUST NORTH OF KCID AIRPORT TO NEAR KFEP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hit 36 today, snow compacted about an inch. Depth now a very heavy 7" (water content 1.2"). Getting excited. Will miss the heaviest snow to the south, but its a special night as Detroit will be snowing its way into the record books. February 2011 will become just the 4th calendar month on record (131 years) to have 30+ inches of snow officially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Completely different from the 00z RUC. This one is going down to the wire. It's either boom or bust.

Yeah i would not write this off yet if i were as far east as you guys are. Out this way? Oh heck yeah. I have never ever seen anything work out with the surface low taking a track so far south and i full expect a near shutout with 2-3 max if i am very lucky. This has shades of March 08 written all over it ( just a slight bit farther to the nw this go around ) and that was a shut out here.

BTW. The euro did kinda sh!t the bed with this as did it's ensembles. See the start of the thread and last one and see how many runs of both brought better snows up this way and tracked the surface low to near Cleveland. Gonna be one of the bigger euro/euro ensemble busts i have seen recently in it's supposed hot zone of day 2-3/5. However i did warn that this system touched on a euro weak spot and thus see the northern system that brought the convective snows up this way last night. That ended up stronger and pushed the confluence etc zone a little farther south as the GFS/NAM had been hinting at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOT:

736 PM CST

SOME ADJUSTMENTS TO THE GOING HEADLINES TONIGHT. OPEN WAVES HAVE A

TENDENCY TO POSE SIGNIFICANT CHALLENGES TO FORECASTS...WHICH IS THE

CASE THIS EVENING IN REGARDS TO THE PRECISE PLACEMENT AND TRACK OF

THE LOW PRESSURE. HI-RES GUIDANCE CONTINUES TO INDICATE A SLIGHTLY

FURTHER SOUTH PATH OF THE SFC LOW PRESSURE...ACROSS EXTREME

SOUTHERN IL/IN WITH THE 850MB LOW DISPLACED JUST TO THE NORTHWEST.

A WEAK FRONTOGENETIC BAND THIS EVENING WAS LOCATED ACROSS

WINNEBAGO COUNTY STRETCHED SOUTHWEST THROUGH CENTRAL IA...HOWEVER

CURRENT RADAR TRENDS HAS BEEN SHOWING WEAKENING TO THIS BAND AND A

SOUTHEAST TREND. GUIDANCE SUGGESTS THAT SNOWFALL TOTALS WILL NOT

BE AS HIGH FURTHER NORTH ALONG THE FAR NORTHERN ROW OF COUNTIES IN

IL...THUS HAVE CANCELLED THE ADVISORY FOR THESE LOCATIONS WHERE IT

APPEARS 1 TO 3 INCHES IS NOW EXPECTED. ELSEWHERE A SECOND DEFORMATION ZONE

APPEARS TO BE TRYING TO FORM ACROSS CENTRAL IL SLIDING NORTHEAST

THROUGH A PORTION OF THE CURRENT WARNING AREAS OF OUR CWFA.

THE WILDCARD CONTINUES TO BE A DRY WEDGE THAT LATEST GUIDANCE IS

NOW BEGINNING TO HAVE A BETTER HANDLE ON. 21Z SREF CONTINUES TO

PROG A LARGE REGION OF A POTENT EASTERLY/NORTHEASTERLY JET OF 40KT

ACROSS MUCH OF CENTRAL/SOUTHERN CWFA. WRAP AROUND MOISTURE AND

FORCING SHOULD AID IN ENHANCING SNOWFALL OVERNIGHT FOR

CENTRAL/SOUTHERN PORTIONS OF THE CWFA WHERE THE HEADLINES WILL

REMAIN UNTOUCHED.

ACROSS THE SOUTHERN TIER TEMPERATURES WILL CONTINUE TO DYNAMICALLY

COOL...AS ONSET OF PRECIP WILL BE A MIX OF RA/IP BEFORE BECOMING

ALL SN. ISOALLOBARIC PRES CHG FROM RUC/NAM CONTINUE TO SHOW A 3HR

PRES CHG OF 3-5MB BETWEEN 06-09Z...WHICH CONTINUES TO SUPPORT THE

WIND GUSTS OF 25 TO 30 MPH...WITH OCCASIONAL GUSTS TO 35MPH

ESPECIALLY ALONG THE IMMEDIATE LAKESHORE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah i would not write this off yet if i were as far east as you guys are. Out this way? Oh heck yeah. I have never ever seen anything work out with the surface low taking a track so far south and i full expect a near shutout with 2-3 max if i am very lucky. This has shades of March 08 written all over it ( just a slight bit farther to the nw this go around ) and that was a shut out here.

BTW. The euro did kinda sh!t the bed with this as did it's ensembles. See the start of the thread and last one and see how many runs of both brought better snows up this way and tracked the surface low to near Cleveland. Gonna be one of the bigger euro/euro ensemble busts i have seen recently in it's supposed hot zone of day 2-3/5. However i did warn that this system touched on a euro weak spot and thus see the northern system that brought the convective snows up this way last night. That ended up stronger and pushed the confluence etc zone a little farther south as the GFS/NAM had been hinting at.

If the 0z NAM track verifies, the sfc low track will end closer to the GFS than the EURO. So I retract what I said earlier about giving the EURO the gold. Not sure if I wrote that before the 12z models had come out, because I was somewhat cocky about them coming back NW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah i would not write this off yet if i were as far east as you guys are. Out this way? Oh heck yeah. I have never ever seen anything work out with the surface low taking a track so far south and i full expect a near shutout with 2-3 max if i am very lucky. This has shades of March 08 written all over it ( just a slight bit farther to the nw this go around ) and that was a shut out here.

BTW. The euro did kinda sh!t the bed with this as did it's ensembles. See the start of the thread and last one and see how many runs of both brought better snows up this way and tracked the surface low to near Cleveland. Gonna be one of the bigger euro/euro ensemble busts i have seen recently in it's supposed hot zone of day 2-3/5. However i did warn that this system touched on a euro weak spot and thus see the northern system that brought the convective snows up this way last night. That ended up stronger and pushed the confluence etc zone a little farther south as the GFS/NAM had been hinting at.

Yea while the euro was a bit off, it still wasn't that bad. More than not, it's usually right. I think most models struggle with analyzing of northern streams and where and how strong the confluence ends up. A lot of bad timings with northern streams pushing southern streams east, northern energy suppressing strong southern lows, or southern energies robbing moisture of a decently strong northern stream. Some worked out some didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the 0z NAM track verifies, the sfc low track will end closer to the GFS than the EURO. So I retract what I said earlier about giving the EURO the gold. Not sure if I wrote that before the 12z models had come out, because I was somewhat cocky about them coming back NW.

It will take a miracle to get this thing to end up anywhere near where the euro and it's ensembles tracked it. Thus just north of the river to Cleveland. No dice there. Now it is more of a matter of where and or when does this thing turn more towards the ne/nne or whatever? Or will it even do that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will take a miracle to get this thing to end up anywhere near where the euro and it's ensembles tracked it. Thus just north of the river to Cleveland. No dice there. Now it is more of a matter of where and or when does this thing turn more towards the ne/nne or whatever? Or will it even do that?

Do you think the 00z RUC is correct Harry?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baroclinic_Instability, where do you get those great tropopause maps? I love those.

Univ. of Utah has GFS maps for pretty much the world, lol. I love them too--just a basic DT/925 theta combo--but they do the job.

http://weather.utah....fs004&r=NH&d=DT

SPC has the potential vorticity maps for the mesoanalysis too.

This guy has DT maps on theta surfaces--but the graphics are kinda corny. Still works though.

http://www.atmos.alb...els/gfs_dt.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea while the euro was a bit off, it still wasn't that bad. More than not, it's usually right. I think most models struggle with analyzing of northern streams and where and how strong the confluence ends up. A lot of bad timings with northern streams pushing southern streams east, northern energy suppressing strong southern lows, or southern energies robbing moisture of a decently strong northern stream. Some worked out some didn't.

Yeah and as i mentioned this touched on one of the few weak spots the euro has which is with northern energy like that stuff last night. The other models did do a better job with it. Rare but it happens. Thus see what baro said about the models and how they have done with it and past systems etc. On the whole it is not a massive shift but it never was gonna be a massive shift but small ones which for *some* ( see here/LAF etc ) could be huge and it looks to be that way. Still rare to see the euro show what it did for here and several other locations and end up being alot different and thus why i say one of the bigger euro busts recently. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...