Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,601
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

february 20-21st winter storm


earthlight

Recommended Posts

im thinking 2-4, 3-5 in some spots. i mean its not rocket science, i can somewhat read maps and listen to you guys.

and by no means i was forecasting at any point. i never forecast cuz i leave that up to you pros. i just look at maps and radars, and try to learn in the process.

definitely not rocket science but definitely much more than reading maps... experience and knowledge of the area, climatology, not model hugging, like with our last major storm if you model hugged you forecasted 4-8' like some... but if you took the setup and thought about what was playing out and where the banding would set up on the NW side of the storm you saw the potential for many of us to get rocked.. models never show the 20-30" jackpot in most nor'easters when a general area recieves around a foot..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 676
  • Created
  • Last Reply

ok i wasnt mocking though. sorry, not like i can deliver my emotions on here. but when you said its dying out and fizzling i thought you were saying its doing something other than what it was progged to do. thats all. my apologies if i came across like an a$.

no prob.. i was just over-emphasizing the fact that its not going to intensify

Link to comment
Share on other sites

definitely not rocket science but definitely much more than reading maps... experience and knowledge of the area, climatology, not model hugging, like with our last major storm if you model hugged you forecasted 4-8' like some... but if you took the setup and thought about what was playing out and where the banding would set up on the NW side of the storm you saw the potential for many of us to get rocked.. models never show the 20-30" jackpot in most nor'easters when a general area recieves around a foot..

and i actually was one who saw the setup and thought 4-8" would bust low easily. but whatever im not here to pat myself for a good job lol. im here to learn from you and the rest of the METs, and some weenies too.

but i understand your points. and yes of course its more than just reading maps and not model hugging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love to hear PT's thoughts on this event and how the rest of this week will possibly play out. Any thoughts PT? Looking to a voice of reason with expertise as well.

I think 2-4" for most of us with the current event (some locally more/less). Then It remains extremely active with an event every two-three days (for at least the next 3-4 weeks) but each storm system will move either just south or just n and w of us and the models keep switching back and forth with the tracks of each system. Therefore, there isn't much confidence until you get within 48-60 hours of what's next. Also, without the blocking we might have had, all these systems are fast movers which doesn't allow alot of time for mixing or a period of plain rain and also significant snow--it's one or the other. Best I can say is stay tuned and buckle up because it's a fast busy ride right now and we do not know exactly where we're going with each event.

WX/PT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, what certainly seemed like a 4 or possibly 5 inch snowstorm in my neck of the woods only a few hours ago appears to have been reduced to a 2 inch coating...maybe up to 3 if everything breaks right. If nothing else, it reinforces one of life's most important...and unpleasant....lessons...how a good situation can turn bad at the drop of a hat...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, what certainly seemed like a 4 or possibly 5 inch snowstorm in my neck of the woods only a few hours ago appears to have been reduced to a 2 inch coating...maybe up to 3 if everything breaks right. If nothing else, it reinforces one of life's most important...and unpleasant....lessons...how a good situation can turn bad at the drop of a hat...

We'll see, William: the SPC WRF is showing over .5" liquid for NYC metro, and the RUC has also trended stronger with simulated radar on its latest run. I don't think we can make a judgment until the storm is actually over, a lot of people have the bad habit of flip-flopping with each model run and thus changing their forecast constantly. I'd be a little more conservative out there on LI but I still think 2-4" is a minimum for all of NYC metro with SE NY, NNJ, and SW CT perhaps seeing 4-6".

Intense convective precipitation building along the I-80 corridor in Western PA/Eastern OH...after a period of light-moderate snows in the next couple hours, we could see a stretch of heavier snow if that banding moves towards the region. Some of those heavy echoes on radar will die as the storm becomes colder and sleets changes to snow, but there's definitely some good rates out there. I've been a bit disappointed by the break-up shown on radar over the last few hours, but a lot of the storm is supposed to come from the banding over the Great Lakes and now what's been developing in Central PA. We'll see where this goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll see, William: the SPC WRF is showing over .5" liquid for NYC metro, and the RUC has also trended stronger with simulated radar on its latest run. I don't think we can make a judgment until the storm is actually over, a lot of people have the bad habit of flip-flopping with each model run and thus changing their forecast constantly. I'd be a little more conservative out there on LI but I still think 2-4" is a minimum for all of NYC metro with SE NY, NNJ, and SW CT perhaps seeing 4-6".

Intense convective precipitation building along the I-80 corridor in Western PA/Eastern OH...after a period of light-moderate snows in the next couple hours, we could see a stretch of heavier snow if that banding moves towards the region. Some of those heavy echoes on radar will die as the storm becomes colder and sleets changes to snow, but there's definitely some good rates out there. I've been a bit disappointed by the break-up shown on radar over the last few hours, but a lot of the storm is supposed to come from the banding over the Great Lakes and now what's been developing in Central PA. We'll see where this goes.

I'd offer your location should likely see 1.0 to 1.5 inches more than me...but most of the models I have scanned look keenly disappointing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SN

32.5/26

Coating on all surfaces except paved roads...really has been coming down here in Dobbs Ferry, my car is already solidly covered in snow and the temperature has dropped to freezing. It's nice to see solid snow cover on everything after the torch wiped out so much of our beautiful snow. Radar looks totally awesome in Central PA, gonna be a great storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 in Brooklyn don't know how it's Gonna stick

The temperature drops quickly once the precipitation arrives since dewpoints are low. What you need to be looking at right now is the dewpoint, not the actual temperature. I went from 35/14 to 32/26 in a hurry once the accumulating snows started here in Westchester. It's not having trouble sticking at all here, except to paved surfaces which will be covered later in the storm. Still liking a 4-6" call for the NW suburbs with 3-5" in NYC proper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...