Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,603
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Feb 1-3 Storm is a NESIS Cat 3 - 5.30


Recommended Posts

Not to mention, why are snowfall totals that occur in the midwest and plains counted for east coast snowstorms also?

If you slice the lower 48 in 1/4 's, the vast majority of that storm is in the NE quadrant of CONUS.

Ohh, and its the first NESIS map I've ever seen that gives more snow the we actually received, No one in the lower 2/3rds on NJ saw 1 - 3" snow or sleet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its wonderful how they chose to incorporate the JFK horrendous mismeasurement. 4-10" lmao Im sure JM, Ace and a few others will chime in on this also.

Its funny the cat is so low, since it was the only corridor wide snowstorm this winter, but thats probably because there werent any >20" official totals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't that map a little fishy. Portions of Central Ohio go from 4 - 10 to 0 and parts of Oklahoma go from 10 - 20 to 0 with no gradient in between.

Lol, you're driving from Cincinnati to Columbus and it goes from nothing to 4" magically. :unsure:

The 1/26-27 map is a bit sketchy, too. The foothills and northern Piedmont in North Carolina did not pick up 1-4" of snow. Some of those areas saw a few flakes and/or a dusting, but not 1-4".

Yeah, what's up with the map in Minnesota as well? Weird.

These maps seem to be data-starved around the edges... it looks like much wider areas of terrain were covered by the low end totals (and in Ohio's case, apparently by the mid-range totals too) than reality would indicate. Keep in mind that these maps are preliminary...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That ranking seems aweful low... I mean, everyone Philly north essentially had 10-20 and it only is ranked cat 1?

Its like Feb '67 (cat 2) but with even lower coverage of 10"+...so once you see the Feb '67 map, it makes a bit more sense...here's the two maps

19670205-19670208-3.50.jpg

20110126-20110127-2.17-p.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...