Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Winter returns with a vengeance thread


Damage In Tolland

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

“If you live at a high northern or southern latitude, watch for some spectacular lights in the sky Tuesday night.“ NASA report on a huge solar flare late sunday

Geophysical Activity Forecast: The geomagnetic field is expected to be predominately quiet to unsettled with isolated active periods on day one (15 February). There is a slight chance for isolated minor storm periods on days two and three (16-17 February). The increase is forecast due to the expected return of a recurrent coronal hole high speed stream and the arrival of a CME from yesterday's M6 event.

meh...usually that doesn't cut it for 42-43N.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS is really a classic -PNA patterm while the euro is not nearly as classic at all. I do kind of question the evolution of the GFS solution with some of the points you consider. Also, fast flow has been causing the GFS to flip-flop solutions from time to time. I wouldn't totally rule it out based on the -PNA , but it's times like these where ensemble come into play.

Ultimately every system turned warmer in the last two weeks even PRIOR to the pattern change completing. With a big high in one form or another parked off the SE coast "going zucker' may be the way to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FIRST X-FLARE OF THE NEW SOLAR CYCLE: Sunspot 1158 has unleashed the strongest solar flare in more than four years. The eruption, which peaked at 0156 UT on Feb. 15th, registered X2 on the Richter scale of solar flares. NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory recorded an intense flash of extreme ultraviolet radiation, circled below:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FIRST X-FLARE OF THE NEW SOLAR CYCLE: Sunspot 1158 has unleashed the strongest solar flare in more than four years. The eruption, which peaked at 0156 UT on Feb. 15th, registered X2 on the Richter scale of solar flares. NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory recorded an intense flash of extreme ultraviolet radiation, circled below:

oh..the forecast I posted was written last night at 22z before the X2 solar flare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not according to Scott , NBD but just common sense. Liking the Euro GGEM combo, NOGAPS? SS seven time LOL/

"The type of snow also has an affect. If the snow is

light and fluffy ("dry snow") it may not melt as fast

as heavy, "wet" snow that has more liquid water in it.

A light, fluffy snow also allows more light to filter

through it, thereby distributing the energy through

a greater depth of snow, whereas wet snow absorbs

much of the Sun's energy near the top of the snow and

therefore it melts at the top; the melted snow drips

through the snowpack, making it "wetter" and icy if

temperatures drop well below freezing."

David R. Cook

Atmospheric Research Section

Environmental Research Division

Argonne National Laboratory

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The type of snow also has an affect. If the snow is

light and fluffy ("dry snow") it may not melt as fast

as heavy, "wet" snow that has more liquid water in it.

A light, fluffy snow also allows more light to filter

through it, thereby distributing the energy through

a greater depth of snow, whereas wet snow absorbs

much of the Sun's energy near the top of the snow and

therefore it melts at the top; the melted snow drips

through the snowpack, making it "wetter" and icy if

temperatures drop well below freezing."

David R. Cook

Atmospheric Research Section

Environmental Research Division

Argonne National Laboratory

Dry fluffy snow compacts and sublimates faster than wet snow though. Melting is just one aspect of snow depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geophysical Activity Forecast: The geomagnetic field is expected to be predominately quiet to unsettled with isolated active periods on day one (15 February). There is a slight chance for isolated minor storm periods on days two and three (16-17 February). The increase is forecast due to the expected return of a recurrent coronal hole high speed stream and the arrival of a CME from yesterday's M6 event.

meh...usually that doesn't cut it for 42-43N.

Interesting, multiple sources seem to suggest something more. NASA reports it is the biggest one in 4 years; but then again, we are in a historic solar minimum so that may not be saying much. Anyway, don't blame the messenger - that was quoted from NASA. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe it takes a CME about 3 days to reach earth. Peak conditions would be like Thursday night...

Huh, ...you're right about that - i'm sure why the press docket mentions tonight. Maybe that was type-o on there part, but I also am aware that based on how energetic the ejection is the velocity and arrival time may vary, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huh, ...you're right about that - i'm sure why the press docket mentions tonight. Maybe that was type-o on there part, but I also am aware that based on how energetic the ejection is the velocity and arrival time may vary, too.

tonight could be active from the flare/CME on the 13th..I think we have to wait until Thursday night for last night's flare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve, that kicks ass. No cloud cover this time.

(especially since it shows the lack of snow in the M.A. - bwahahahaah)

High res I finally found the historical site, you can look pretty far back

http://ge.ssec.wisc.edu/modis-today/index.php?satellite=t1&product=true_color&date=2011_02_15_046&overlay_sector=false&overlay_state=true&overlay_coastline=true&sector=USA4&resolution=250m'>http://ge.ssec.wisc.edu/modis-today/index.php?satellite=t1&product=true_color&date=2011_02_15_046&overlay_sector=false&overlay_state=true&overlay_coastline=true&sector=USA4&resolution=250m

http://ge.ssec.wisc.edu/modis-today/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

High res I finally found the historical site, you can look pretty far back

http://ge.ssec.wisc.edu/modis-today/index.php?satellite=t1&product=true_color&date=2011_02_15_046&overlay_sector=false&overlay_state=true&overlay_coastline=true&sector=USA4&resolution=250m'>http://ge.ssec.wisc.edu/modis-today/index.php?satellite=t1&product=true_color&date=2011_02_15_046&overlay_sector=false&overlay_state=true&overlay_coastline=true&sector=USA4&resolution=250m

http://ge.ssec.wisc.edu/modis-today/

You can clearly see why some sites have greater depth and the haves and have nots

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...