Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

The Look Ahead Thread


WinterWxLuvr

Recommended Posts

It's money in the bank. Ji has got it right on this one. Rain - modeled perfectly, snow - modeled completely wrong.

I saw this as a last chance. So be it, let's bring on spring then summer. My wish ... avg high temp of 65 degrees until May 1 with a daily deviation of 5 degrees, avg 70 from May 1 to June 20 same dev., avg 75 from June 20 to Aug 1, same dev., avg 80 from Aug 1 to Aug 2, then back down the same way until Nov. 1.

I am throwing in the towel as well. Let get on to Spring and Summer so we can get back to Fall and Winter. Here's to saying good bye to the Winter of 2010-2011 and onwards to Winter of 2011-2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 704
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I agree. It looks over. But that's OK. It's time. Maybe next year will be better. I'm not really a fan of late March snow anyway.

Just imagine how different our opinion of this winter would have been had 1) the Christmas storm delivered 2) the Jan 11 storm had done what it looked like it would just 24 hours before it happened 3) the Presidents day storm had been more snow than sleet. I think we'd have all been happy. But, it still could have been worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. It looks over. But that's OK. It's time. Maybe next year will be better. I'm not really a fan of late March snow anyway.

Just imagine how different our opinion of this winter would have been had 1) the Christmas storm delivered 2) the Jan 11 storm had done what it looked like it would just 24 hours before it happened 3) the Presidents day storm had been more snow than sleet. I think we'd have all been happy. But, it still could have been worse.

True that. So many near misses this winter that would have made it pretty good, but it just didn't pan out. Oh well. Philly was fortunate and actually cashed in quite well this year, getting hit by most of those events we missed out on.

But you know, I'm glad we at least had the excitement of the Jan. 26 upper low on steroids storm, that was quite awesome to experience! Despite my power going out for 2 days because of it (and Pepco!). And, it was very picturesque! I'd say of the past 10 winters I've experienced here, this one was still much better than the awful 2001-02 and 2007-08 seasons.

(Edit: BTW out of curiosity, are you a Reds fan, and from Cincinnati? Just wondering because of your avatar photo. I'm from Cleveland originally, a long-suffering Browns and Indians fan, and even the Cavs! I still wince at "the drive", "the fumble", "the shot", and when Jose Mesa came in to pitch in game 7 of the 1997 Series!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'd be hesitant to totally give up.. the gfs still tracks the 500 vort favorably though it's barely there and there is no amplification. however, in this range i'd lean toward it modeling the vort too weak and if it were to hold similar it could end up looking sort of namish tho the nam is super fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it me or has the GFS sped things up a bit too over the last 24 hrs?

i guess it's technically 2 seperate waves.. the nam is keyed up big on the first. 0z gfs a little more juiced with the mon night/tue system

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'd be hesitant to totally give up.. the gfs still tracks the 500 vort favorably though it's barely there and there is no amplification. however, in this range i'd lean toward it modeling the vort too weak and if it were to hold similar it could end up looking sort of namish tho the nam is super fast.

I know your probably goign to say Im not worred about surface temps 84 hours out, but isnt the NAM verbatim questionable on surface temps or no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the 12z GFS the storm track continues to be relatively north and warm in the later period, it now tries to do what the CMC does though between 90 and 108 hours in bringing a shortwave up the coast, however there is nothing to supply cold air so the same regions will have a chance at snow, mainly Northern NY and New England...Fridays highs should be nice throughout the area ranging from 60's in NYC to 70's in DC and Baltimore, I refuse to look at much beyond 180 hours as the model truncates and looses resolution and tries to do some crazy things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the 12z GFS the storm track continues to be relatively north and warm in the later period, it now tries to do what the CMC does though between 90 and 108 hours in bringing a shortwave up the coast, however there is nothing to supply cold air so the same regions will have a chance at snow, mainly Northern NY and New England...Fridays highs should be nice throughout the area ranging from 60's in NYC to 70's in DC and Baltimore, I refuse to look at much beyond 180 hours as the model truncates and looses resolution and tries to do some crazy things.

If you scanned the profiles of the NAM-- its SUPER dry between 60-84 hours. 700 mb dews are sub -30-- which is crazy- I'm sure that kills any development that COULD happen in that time frame.

Still worth watching, not much else. I still think above 2k in SW VA has a shot at something. maybe only 1-2 inches, but thats something

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you scanned the profiles of the NAM-- its SUPER dry between 60-84 hours. 700 mb dews are sub -30-- which is crazy- I'm sure that kills any development that COULD happen in that time frame.

Still worth watching, not much else. I still think above 2k in SW VA has a shot at something. maybe only 1-2 inches, but thats something

The NAM is not exactly in range at 60-84 hours..I wasnt saying that what the GFS shows has or is going to be right but both the GFS and CMC now show it, other than that I agree with your assessment..Certainly 0 chance at flakes for DC and Baltimore

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NAM is not exactly in range at 60-84 hours..I wasnt saying that what the GFS shows has or is going to be right but both the GFS and CMC now show it, other than that I agree with your assessment..Certainly 0 chance at flakes for DC and Baltimore

I wasn't taking the NAM as is-- and I didn't check the GFS profiles, but even cutting it in half is rather cold/dry air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't checked the other models, but the GFS has been showing a possible storm the past few runs developing in the 8 to 9 day timeframe. Yes, I know it is over a week out, but at least it could be a little something to track for at least a few days- maybe a rain ending as snow event? Overall, set-up does not look too bad with some pretty cold air following behind whatever type of storm system that develops.

12z 3/16 GFS - http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/namer//gfs/12/gfs_pcp168192_l.shtml

0z 3/17 GFS - http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/namer//gfs/00/gfs_pcp168192_l.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't checked the other models, but the GFS has been showing a possible storm the past few runs developing in the 8 to 9 day timeframe. Yes, I know it is over a week out, but at least it could be a little something to track for at least a few days- maybe a rain ending as snow event? Overall, set-up does not look too bad with some pretty cold air following behind whatever type of storm system that develops.

12z 3/16 GFS - http://www.nco.ncep....p168192_l.shtml

0z 3/17 GFS - http://www.nco.ncep....p168192_l.shtml

6z 3/17 GFS looks even better in the 168-180 timeframe. Quite a high up to the north. Our luck has not been good this season so at this point just something to track for fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...