Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

The Look Ahead Thread


WinterWxLuvr

Recommended Posts

DT"s outlook says active severe-wx season coming, I'm ready. Maybe we will hit that special zone between the dryness and the storm track

:lightning:

For the Plains/Midwest. Not for here.

That being said, I think we'll be hit or miss this year. We could have another "ridge of death" over the Southeast, which would push storms further north. However, if the ridge is weaker this year compared to last year (i.e. my forecast), the storm's dynamics will push through a little further south and therefore a little closer to our region. I could see an above average amount of cold frontal storms happening this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 704
  • Created
  • Last Reply

For the Plains/Midwest. Not for here.

That being said, I think we'll be hit or miss this year. We could have another "ridge of death" over the Southeast, which would push storms further north. However, if the ridge is weaker this year compared to last year (i.e. my forecast), the storm's dynamics will push through a little further south and therefore a little closer to our region. I could see an above average amount of cold frontal storms happening this year.

I would gladly take that. What usually follows those cold frontal storms is nice, dry, comfortable air. Now that's fine summer weather.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

March 5-6 storm rather interesting, but will probably be a loss for all sides. Moderate to heavy rain with maybe a few rumbles of thunder. NAM showing the possibility of an embedded convective line in southern VA... something to at least have fun watching on radar.

Timing... GFS probably still has the best idea... ECM running a little slower, and NAM running even slower than that. Vort stays fairly well preserved on NAM and GFS, but should pass to our north. GFS goes negative with the UL trough faster than the NAM and ECM... recent trends indicate that it's been too quick to do that. NAM/ECM blend with GFS speed would be my best guess as to how to depict the storm via the models.

East of the mountains will likely not get accumulating snow, though some flakes could be seen falling from the sky at the end of the main precip. event and/or with some brief lake-effect afterward.

-----

Watching the Thursday system... could be hit or miss with boomers. CAD out ahead of the storm will probably be in issue, but intense WAA could negate it. GFS and ECM depicting SFC low development to our south as main precip. heads through... not a good sign. We need these lows to be cleaner and track to our north if we want to see some good storms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hmm.

Yeah dude you really gotta watch that. It's been discussed a lot this winter. That shows what precip has fallen PRIOR to that point. The 850 line is right over us. All that precip has likely mostly all fallen BEFORE the 850 crosses us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

suprised this storm isn't getting discussed much...we won't see anything more than a flurry at the end but it's still interesting to track...

moderate to heavy rain gets no love till there is flooding

Link to comment
Share on other sites

euro holds off most precip till midday sunday but it's pretty wet too.. 1"+ everywhere, prob closer to 2" in many spots.

yep..looks like a legit qpf event 1.50-2 inches

Whats it showing on March 11? I see a bit of cold liquid in the MOS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really... my previous thoughts (see: previous page) still stand. Crappy air in place before the system... way too stable.

Yes I read that. Seems though that models usually trend dynamically better towards the event/or kill it? I wouldn't expect anything better 1 week out, especially this time of year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I read that. Seems though that models usually trend dynamically better towards the event..or kill it? I wouldn't expect anything better 1 week out, especially this time of year.

The main problem so far and going into the future is the presence of high pressure systems to the north and east of the storm systems... they keep filling into the region, which is causing stable air to lock in east of the mountains. Because the low pressure systems are in such close proximity to the highs, we don't get enough southerly flow ahead of the storms to draw the unstable air far enough north. Instead, once we actually DO warm sector, we're then pulling in milder air off of the Atlantic, which helps our case a little but isn't the potent air that we COULD get from the Gulf.

If you'll recall my "perfect ingredients for severe weather in the Mid-Atlantic"

Best guess (for any time of the year) would be (1) high pressure to the E two days prior, drawing up warm, moist air from the Gulf the two days before, with (2) a potent low w/ the vort. max in a negatively-tilted trough coming out of the base of a trough moving ENE from (approx.) OK->OH->PA/NY. Aiding this would be (3) upper level jet(s) in a couple of different spots (either putting us in the left-exit or right-entrance part of the jet for greatest UL divergence).

We are looking at a good storm track and a deepening low (perhaps I should have used that terminology instead of negative-based trough since neutral-tilt continental systems are also quite potent), and we also have support of an upper-level jet. However, condition #1 is not being met in that the high pressure is out of position. Instead of being well off the coast and drawing air up from the south (Gulf), it's close proximity to the storm systems is what's causing us the biggest headache in getting unstable air and storms into the region.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main problem so far and going into the future is the presence of high pressure systems to the north and east of the storm systems... they keep filling into the region, which is causing stable air to lock in east of the mountains. Because the low pressure systems are in such close proximity to the highs, we don't get enough southerly flow ahead of the storms to draw the unstable air far enough north. Instead, once we actually DO warm sector, we're then pulling in milder air off of the Atlantic, which helps our case a little but isn't the potent air that we COULD get from the Gulf.

If you'll recall my "perfect ingredients for severe weather in the Mid-Atlantic"

We are looking at a good storm track and a deepening low (perhaps I should have used that terminology instead of negative-based trough since neutral-tilt continental systems are also quite potent), and we also have support of an upper-level jet. However, condition #1 is not being met in that the high pressure is out of position. Instead of being well off the coast and drawing air up from the south (Gulf), it's close proximity to the storm systems is what's causing us the biggest headache in getting unstable air and storms into the region.

Agree completely on the highs locking the CAD in place until its too late, lets save that for winter. Timing of all the features could be a factor between now and then, just my view. I think it'd be a good storm system to track nonetheless.

If the timing of the storm speeds up, the low is probably weaker, so outrunning the high is not an option? Deeper, slower, solution may cut it too far west? I don't have your knowledge base obviously :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...