Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Fail and Fooked


Ji

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 626
  • Created
  • Last Reply

That is terrible...there is virtually no precip anywhere if I am reading it right

Reading incorrectly. White areas are precip :whistle: lol

Yes you are correct. Precip maps are the easy ones to read :thumbsup: It's H5 etc that gives people issues (including me with all those crazy looking yellow-orange swirls).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think it's totally fair to rate someone based on their merits and there are clearly mets who are not as good as others. being wrong a fair amount has always been a big part of being a met. i dont know when mentioning that sometimes a met is wrong became a crime. clearly some go way overboard tho.

I'm not saying that all of it is bashing (this is also in reply to jack_frost's recent posts). Here's some examples of what I would consider bashing more so than proper analysis and verification:

DT is only as good as the models as most mets and hobbyists are

There is really no reason to have mets anymore. The models rule and as the models flip so will the mets. Basically the models dictate what the mets will forecast

when you come down to it, that idiot JB was the person to light a fire under this one as being a big deal

it ain't over, but honestly, there never was anything special about this threat that JB tried to make it

****ALERT ALERT****everything i say (DT) turns to carp film at 11:00

The first two are from Ji, so those I could care less about, but like I said before, if people are reading this stuff they may think it's true and/or jump on the bandwagon. There's also been bashing on LWX and Upton that wasn't warranted. It's fair to be critical, but it's unfair to insult without having a full understanding of the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying that all of it is bashing (this is also in reply to jack_frost's recent posts). Here's some examples of what I would consider bashing more so than proper analysis and verification:

The first two are from Ji, so those I could care less about, but like I said before, if people are reading this stuff they may think it's true and/or jump on the bandwagon. There's also been bashing on LWX and Upton that wasn't warranted. It's fair to be critical, but it's unfair to insult without having a full understanding of the situation.

everyone will have their own interpretation of the models and what will happen, weather is not an exact science. even with all the billions spent on the latest technology, storms will still surprise forecasters, that wont change, and its not anyones fault, that being said some forecasters shouldnt be so bold so many days out
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading incorrectly. White areas are precip :whistle: lol

Yes you are correct. Precip maps are the easy ones to read :thumbsup: It's H5 etc that gives people issues (including me with all those crazy looking yellow-orange swirls).

Thanks I was hoping someone would say "you're crazy, that screams potential"....the worst part about this winter is going from major snow to no snow in such a short time on the models...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh...if it happens, it happens. The trends certainly aren't good, but it's not like this would be the first time that the models have lost a storm around now. I'm not saying I think that'll happen, but I'll remain cautiously interested for a bit more as long as there's *something* on the models.

still plenty of time, but.. if winters over , i hope it ends for good and gets warm, time to fire up my grill

I use the grill 12 months a year!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying that all of it is bashing (this is also in reply to jack_frost's recent posts). Here's some examples of what I would consider bashing more so than proper analysis and verification:

The first two are from Ji, so those I could care less about, but like I said before, if people are reading this stuff they may think it's true and/or jump on the bandwagon. There's also been bashing on LWX and Upton that wasn't warranted. It's fair to be critical, but it's unfair to insult without having a full understanding of the situation.

If you're referring to the bashing LWX got from the last event it was more than warranted. 5am no salt trucks on road and accidents everywhere including a 24y/o losing her life. LWX forecasted nothing and we had close to 4in from the MORNING. Totally blew the 2nd part of event as well. One of their worst performances I can remember. Even I was telling locals 6-10in while TV mets and LWX had 1-3 and no WSW..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're referring to the bashing LWX got from the last event it was more than warranted. 5am no salt trucks on road and accidents everywhere including a 24y/o losing her life. LWX forecasted nothing and we had close to 4in from the MORNING. Totally blew the 2nd part of event as well. One of their worst performances I can remember. Even I was telling locals 6-10in while TV mets and LWX had 1-3 and no WSW..

I'm talking about the rain/ice event we had afterwords... people were all heated up from the snow bust and that was taken into the rain/ice storm forecast more than it should have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's also been bashing on LWX and Upton that wasn't warranted. It's fair to be critical, but it's unfair to insult without having a full understanding of the situation.

Are verification stats for LWX available to the public ? My hunch is that LWX is looking fine.

They verify poorly in matching weenie snow expectations and wishcasts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are verification stats for LWX available to the public ? My hunch is that LWX is looking fine.

They verify poorly in matching weenie snow expectations and wishcasts.

All NWS forecasts and verifications are freely available to the public (or at least they should be... anyone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong) since it is a public department. They continually do internal verifications, so I believe they would be able to give verification info. to anyone by request.

EDIT: Now I'm really getting OT. Sorry for that. I'll try to end my thoughts or move it to a different thread if it continues any longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has just been a really complicated winter. I don't disagree that flip flopping with the models is reaching an all time high. But at the same time I don't think there is much other guidance of value after d1 or d2 to pay as much attention to. In retrospect I too found the HPC comment on inland humorous if for no other reason everything went the opposite way right after. But I know where they were coming from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying that all of it is bashing (this is also in reply to jack_frost's recent posts). Here's some examples of what I would consider bashing more so than proper analysis and verification:

The first two are from Ji, so those I could care less about, but like I said before, if people are reading this stuff they may think it's true and/or jump on the bandwagon. There's also been bashing on LWX and Upton that wasn't warranted. It's fair to be critical, but it's unfair to insult without having a full understanding of the situation.

very cool story bro

see below

The only mets that get "bashed" are the lousy ones, frankly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying that all of it is bashing (this is also in reply to jack_frost's recent posts). Here's some examples of what I would consider bashing more so than proper analysis and verification:

The first two are from Ji, so those I could care less about, but like I said before, if people are reading this stuff they may think it's true and/or jump on the bandwagon. There's also been bashing on LWX and Upton that wasn't warranted. It's fair to be critical, but it's unfair to insult without having a full understanding of the situation.

you know what I say?

tough

if you can't handle the heat, get out of the kitchen

my comment re JB was spot on and, he's part of a pay package at Accuwx, so I have every right, as does anyone else, to criticize mets WHEN THEY MAKE BONEHEAD CALLS, especially if you are paying for their opinion

JB has an undisputed history (by even him) of hyping events

if he, or anyone else, is going to do it such that his prediction looks idiotic, then he will look like an idiot when it fails as the alternative is a measured approach

now, if he verifies, he goes from village idiot to Einstein, Jr., but he has shown he is more than willing to take that risk

anyway, you think JB cares what I say? :lol: he can take care of himself

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...