Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

The Winter 2010-11 NYC/PHL Medium Range Thread


am19psu

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 990
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Just curious, isn't the ensemble mean a blend of all the ensembles? Even tho some are warmer/colder or even completely different, wouldn't it all just balance out to somewhat agree with the op?

Im not tony, but yes the ens mean is the avg of the ens mean. Put it like this,using monthy temps, say for the month straight we had 26 of 31 days that were in the -2 to -5 below normal range for temps. Those other 5 days were plus 10- 15, the mean avg of the month would be close to normal, even though 3/4 of the month was below normal. Do you get what im trying to say? Relate that to the 12 indiv ens members say 8 of them had storms that cut across the north above us, but 4 of them showed storms going off the sc coast, the mean would adjust it, south to get the avg, when majority of the ens members show a northern track, you follow?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not tony, but yes the ens mean is the avg of the ens mean. Put it like this,using monthy temps, say for the month straight we had 26 of 31 days that were in the -2 to -5 below normal range for temps. Those other 5 days were plus 10- 15, the mean avg of the month would be close to normal, even though 3/4 of the month was below normal. Do you get what im trying to say? Relate that to the 12 indiv ens members say 8 of them had storms that cut across the north above us, but 4 of them showed storms going off the sc coast, the mean would adjust it, south to get the avg, when majority of the ens members show a northern track, you follow?

ahh ok that explains it. Thanks man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this any different from normal? It sounds like they are applying the dartboard technology to discuss the weather!:gun_bandana:

Yep. It's such classic accuweather. They run on hype, so they will take the smallest looking storm on the long range models and of course use a headline like "Taking of a Northeast Snowstorm" haha gotta love them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like Accuweather reached an all-new low.

:whistle:

They're going to look dumb in a few days...not that would be anything unusual....this storm is going to cut west as well IMO...if you look at the 12Z GFS at 174 hours just before the resolution truncation while there is a Greenland block there really is no 50/50 low which likely means the SE ridge will fire much more amplified than the 12Z GFS is indicating at 500mb...this probably won't be a massive cutter but probably a snow event more along the lines for DET, TOR, BUF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're going to look dumb in a few days...not that would be anything unusual....this storm is going to cut west as well IMO...if you look at the 12Z GFS at 174 hours just before the resolution truncation while there is a Greenland block there really is no 50/50 low which likely means the SE ridge will fire much more amplified than the 12Z GFS is indicating at 500mb...this probably won't be a massive cutter but probably a snow event more along the lines for DET, TOR, BUF.

ouch, there goes my hope :thumbsdown:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're going to look dumb in a few days...not that would be anything unusual....this storm is going to cut west as well IMO...if you look at the 12Z GFS at 174 hours just before the resolution truncation while there is a Greenland block there really is no 50/50 low which likely means the SE ridge will fire much more amplified than the 12Z GFS is indicating at 500mb...this probably won't be a massive cutter but probably a snow event more along the lines for DET, TOR, BUF.

Yeah, it's the same problem with the 18z GFS. The storm is clearly going to cut west until truncation lowers the model's resolution and causes a miracle solution to occur. You can see, however, that we're basically setting up for a lakes cutter with a primary over the Central Plains and not much of a 50/50 Low to lock in the cold air. I think both the 12/2 and 12/6 storms will end up being too warm for NYC metro. Overall, I'm not liking the pattern I see despite the LR fantasy threats. The La Niña is undergoing a period of rapid strengthening and we don't have a favorable MJO to help us out with tropical convection forcing. I think we might see some better shots at good snowfalls and cold temperatures towards mid-late December but my enthusiasm is tempered now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's the same problem with the 18z GFS. The storm is clearly going to cut west until truncation lowers the model's resolution and causes a miracle solution to occur. You can see, however, that we're basically setting up for a lakes cutter with a primary over the Central Plains and not much of a 50/50 Low to lock in the cold air. I think both the 12/2 and 12/6 storms will end up being too warm for NYC metro. Overall, I'm not liking the pattern I see despite the LR fantasy threats. The La Niña is undergoing a period of rapid strengthening and we don't have a favorable MJO to help us out with tropical convection forcing. I think we might see some better shots at good snowfalls and cold temperatures towards mid-late December but my enthusiasm is tempered now.

12/2 is dead in the water, but 12/5 i think has the most potential so far this season, which isn't saying much. Totally agree on the 18z gfs with the truncation miracle. I think everyone is in a wait and see mode, no one is guaranteeing anything except maybe accuweather, its just nice to have something to keep an eye on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's the same problem with the 18z GFS. The storm is clearly going to cut west until truncation lowers the model's resolution and causes a miracle solution to occur. You can see, however, that we're basically setting up for a lakes cutter with a primary over the Central Plains and not much of a 50/50 Low to lock in the cold air. I think both the 12/2 and 12/6 storms will end up being too warm for NYC metro. Overall, I'm not liking the pattern I see despite the LR fantasy threats. The La Niña is undergoing a period of rapid strengthening and we don't have a favorable MJO to help us out with tropical convection forcing. I think we might see some better shots at good snowfalls and cold temperatures towards mid-late December but my enthusiasm is tempered now.

Problem is it is not just the GFS that is showing a potential at snowfall but the ECM is as well ..albeit on the light side. As i said before in reference to this time period..do not get sold on any track or any 2 meter temperatures...if it is outside of 5 days take it with a grain of salt. The most one can take away from anything right now is that there is potential for a storm in this period.

I also would not say that the NINA is rapidly strengthening.. Back on october 6th 3.4 was at -1.8 and since that time it had actually warmed and then essentially stalled at -1.3 for two weeks or so and since Nino 1 & 2 had warmed with the last reading issued and Nino 4 had also warmed from what it was just two weeks ago. The only region that cooled somewhat was 3.4 but not to near the levels it was before...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem is it is not just the GFS that is showing a potential at snowfall but the ECM is as well ..albeit on the light side. As i said before in reference to this time period..do not get sold on any track or any 2 meter temperatures...if it is outside of 5 days take it with a grain of salt. The most one can take away from anything right now is that there is potential for a storm in this period.

I also would not say that the NINA is rapidly strengthening.. Back on october 6th 3.4 was at -1.8 and since that time it had actually warmed and then essentially stalled at -1.3 for two weeks or so and since Nino 1 & 2 had warmed with the last reading issued and Nino 4 had also warmed from what it was just two weeks ago. The only region that cooled somewhat was 3.4 but not to near the levels it was before...

yeah i was about to ask, "hasnt the nina peaked?" thanks for the clarification

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if anyone wants to explain the 18z gfs outcome be my guest. Looks like a retrograding low pressure out in the atlantic somehow gets us some wintry precip. The only thing i take out of this is that timeframe has atleast some potential.

That isn't really much different from what happened in early November if you think about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...