Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,589
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

January 31-February 2 Historic Winter Storm part 6


Hoosier

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 972
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I haven't made any calls for this event, but like so many in the past we're going to see an impressive gradient LOT wide and i anticipate some enchanced banding which will tantilize but screw some just north. I think areas as far NW as RFD stand a good chance of failing to hit double digits, while far SE areas from IKK to TornadoTony will go well over a foot, to near 2 ft lakeshore NW Indiana. Some prelim calls around LOT, amounts not including 1-2" overrunning snows:

Rockford-6-9"

Schaumburg/Chistorm/Beast: 9-11"

IMBY: 12-15"

IKK: 14-18"

Gary: 16-24"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6z NAM has a dark blue .5-.75 over the far NW suburbs.

EDIT: i do think i confused Des Plaines with DeKalb, my bad.

The NAM which is suffering from feedback issues that B-I made note of and one tiny speck of dark blue surrounded by lighter blues all the way up to southern WI doesn't constitute reasoning of worry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't made any calls for this event, but like so many in the past we're going to see an impressive gradient LOT wide and i anticipate some enchanced banding which will tantilize but screw some just north. I think areas as far NW as RFD stand a good chance of failing to hit double digits, while far SE areas from IKK to TornadoTony will go well over a foot, to near 2 ft lakeshore NW Indiana. Some prelim calls around LOT, amounts not including 1-2" overrunning snows:

Rockford-6-9"

Schaumburg/Chistorm/Beast: 9-11"

IMBY: 12-15"

IKK: 14-18"

Gary: 16-24"

Not bad. but 06z would still be 12-15 inches for Chicago metro and even ORD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6z NAM has a dark blue .5-.75 over the far NW suburbs.

EDIT: i do think i confused Des Plaines with DeKalb, my bad.

Don't worry. All we need is a 25 mile shift in the storm track to the NW. Not even. Still 30hrs to go. I guess Izzy being conservative was the fear of a potential more narrow band southeast of Chicago than progged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see csnavywx lurking--what are your thoughts?

06Z NAM definitely having problems still. 06Z GFS still on track as is the Euro. SREFs still on track (minus a few the ETA members as usual). I'm liking the number of meso models that depict the NW curve in the track now. QPF is going to be a bit of a wild card it seems though, and I don't like diving in against the Euro, especially when it's been extremely steadfast on its solution for days on end now. However, cutting back just a tad (2-4 on totals) and upping the winds seems like a good place to go at this point.

Still favoring the fast occlusion and NW hook scenario as opposed to the flat track, and still think we see a general 1.5 to 1.2 from ORD to DVN for liquid equivalent for the main storm.

Gotta run, I'll be back in a few hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

06Z NAM definitely having problems still. 06Z GFS still on track as is the Euro. SREFs still on track (minus a few the ETA members as usual). I'm liking the number of meso models that depict the NW curve in the track now. QPF is going to be a bit of a wild card it seems though, and I don't like diving in against the Euro, especially when it's been extremely steadfast on its solution for days on end now. However, cutting back just a tad (2-4 on totals) and upping the winds seems like a good place to go at this point.

Still favoring the fast occlusion and NW hook scenario as opposed to the flat track, and still think we see a general 1.5 to 1.2 from ORD to DVN for liquid equivalent for the main storm.

Gotta run, I'll be back in a few hours.

What do u think ratios will be for ORD? I am a bit confused with the 10 or 12:1 ratio when temps are progged to be lower/mid 20s Tuesday night. Well majority of storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do u think ratios will be for ORD? I am a bit confused with the 10 or 12:1 ratio when temps are progged to be lower/mid 20s Tuesday night. Well majority of storm.

Here is a tidbit from the afd...

"QPF IN REASONABLY GOOD AGREEMENT AMONG THEVARIOUS MODELS AND USING A REASONABLY CONSERVATIVE 10-12:1 SLRRESULTS IN SNOWFALL TOTALS OF 8-14 INCHES TUESDAY NIGHT ALONE."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

06Z NAM definitely having problems still. 06Z GFS still on track as is the Euro. SREFs still on track (minus a few the ETA members as usual). I'm liking the number of meso models that depict the NW curve in the track now. QPF is going to be a bit of a wild card it seems though, and I don't like diving in against the Euro, especially when it's been extremely steadfast on its solution for days on end now. However, cutting back just a tad (2-4 on totals) and upping the winds seems like a good place to go at this point.

Still favoring the fast occlusion and NW hook scenario as opposed to the flat track, and still think we see a general 1.5 to 1.2 from ORD to DVN for liquid equivalent for the main storm.

Gotta run, I'll be back in a few hours.

I couldn't agree more.

Hoping you post more--enjoy your thoughts.

Methinks you are a professor or grad student at NIU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...