daddylonglegs Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Ahhh...wait for the GFS/EURO... and hide your kids, hide your wife and hide your husband too...they raping everybody Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OHSnow Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 I love the 00z NAM, safely ALL snow here and now with some room to breathe as well! How about here in Toledo? I see it shows 1.5-1.75" of precipitation here. If that was all snow, it would be over a foot even with awful ratios. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Global_Warmer Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 The nam blasts Wisconsin, relax.... the vort really is taking a further south trek causing the SLP to pop out really far south...pretty impressive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWeatherPimp Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 New guidance absolutely destroys Eastern Indiana and Western Ohio with ice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrick7032 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 I was wondering that myself biggest snow in PIA history Peoria's record is 26.5 inches and occurred three times. Link is below. http://www.crh.noaa.gov/ilx/climate/snopmon.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goknights Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Ahhh...wait for the GFS/EURO... and hide your kids, hide your wife and hide your husband too...they raping everybody ha ha... frank no need for me and you to be on pins and needles eithe way we are getting 3-7 inches of fluff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted January 31, 2011 Author Share Posted January 31, 2011 The nam blasts Wisconsin, relax.... the vort really is taking a further south trek causing the SLP to pop out really far south...pretty impressive. Last night's 00z NAM had the surface low near Corpus Christi...I don't really see this south trend as much as you do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janetjanet998 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Peoria's record is 26.5 inches and occurred three times. Link is below. http://www.crh.noaa....ate/snopmon.php no that the most snow in a month 26.5 biggest in 24 hours is 18.4 on feb 28th 1900 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wisconsinwx Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 The nam blasts Wisconsin, relax.... the vort really is taking a further south trek causing the SLP to pop out really far south...pretty impressive. Yeah. I just feel like a 30 mile shift SE will take us from 12-18 for the main event forecasted right now to about 6 inches, which is a large difference. Therefore, I'm taking any SE shift very seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone77 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 The NAM pushes the epic snows east of the QC, but it's still a nice thumping. I'm gonna ride my call of 10-15" for the QC from earlier today for now lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeenerWx Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 New guidance absolutely destroys Eastern Indiana and Western Ohio with ice. Reminiscing about that ice storm back in the day? (I think it was maybe about 6 or so years ago?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo6899 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Looks like TWC is going more with a weaker SE track? TWC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILSNOW Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Jim Ramsey (not skilling) led the broadcast and is calling for 24 inches for ohare off of the inhouse RPM model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrick7032 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 no that the most snow in a month 26.5 biggest in 24 hours is 18.4 on feb 28th 1900 You are correct. I didn't type 24 hour. Thanks. http://www.crh.noaa.gov/ilx/climate/alltimp.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted January 31, 2011 Author Share Posted January 31, 2011 NAM drops .5" qpf on LAF tomorrow night which is all snow verbatim, but some layers are really close to 0C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted January 31, 2011 Author Share Posted January 31, 2011 00z Nam Cobb on bufkit still has 38" for ORD. Less qpf but maybe better ratios? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWeatherPimp Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Reminiscing about that ice storm back in the day? (I think it was maybe about 6 or so years ago?) You are corrrect, back in 2005, I'm impressed. Hoping it doesn't happen to be honest, definitely not what I want to see, but it is looking more and more inevitable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidwestChaser Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Less qpf but maybe better ratios? NM I deleted it; was still on 12z run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayPSU Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Less qpf but maybe better ratios? No, just hasn't updated yet. If he looks closely the time stamp will say 12Z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted January 31, 2011 Author Share Posted January 31, 2011 NM I deleted it; was still on 12z run. This run will probably still show 28" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baum Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Looks like TWC is going more with a weaker SE track? TWC Yeah I saw this analysis right after Jim Cantore's crocodile stories.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcwxguy Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 00z nam for lincoln, ne is .661 qpf for oma is .717 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prinsburg_wx Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 00Z h resolution rgem at 48 has 988 L near st. louis...running my maps now and will post soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted January 31, 2011 Author Share Posted January 31, 2011 00Z rgem at 48 has 988 L near st. louis...running my maps now and will post soon. Yeah, that's a tad different than the NAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goknights Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 RGEM way stronger at 48 hours Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indystorm Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 That 1060 high pressure in Montana is why I was having difficulty believing that this storm would trend more nw in earlier runs with precip. We are in the fine tuning mode now and the models will stop waffling like the spinning top at the end of the film Inception and fall into place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerball Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 I'll take the 00z NAM FTW. At least now there's more room for adjustments either way, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo6899 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 I'll take the 00z NAM FTW. At least now there's more room for adjustments either way, The NAm has burned me several times 48+ hours out. I will say its a good start to the evening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baroclinic_instability Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 That 1060 high pressure in Montana is why I was having difficulty believing that this storm would trend more nw in earlier runs with precip. We are in the fine tuning mode now and the models will stop waffling like the spinning top at the end of the film Inception and fall into place. They won't. With this type of nonlinear development and positive feedback--they will shift probably every run up to the event. It is why individual runs verbatim should be taken with a grain of salt. Ensemble trends work better here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone77 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 I don't know which model's more inconsistent, the RGEM/GEM or the NAM lol. I'll give the NAM lots of credit though for getting on the overall solution pretty early on. A few 18z runs have been suspect though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.