kab2791 Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 NAM holds strong with some pretty decent WAA snows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Global_Warmer Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 STL will get 15-20 inches of snow off bufkit from this run easy...probably 2-2.5 inches of qpf. at hr 66 it is just insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 nice WAA snow bullseye around chicago at 54hr. heights also looking better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OUWeatherFan Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 You sure that is snow? Looks like it is too warm in the atmosphere. Definitely looks cold enough over northern Illinois, but southern Illinois has 850MB temps above 0 degrees Celsius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Organizing Low Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 by 54, the heights in the eastern lakes are improved and more amplifcation out ahead of the trough vs the 18z GFS the positon of the base is a bit SE of the 18z GFS, so it may end up a wash defintely more amped than the 18z NAM though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMIweather Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 Another good run for Central Oklahoma. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baroclinic_instability Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 Wow here it goes. Hr 66--positive feedback has begun. This NAM run will be intense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 You sure that is snow? Looks like it is too warm in the atmosphere. N IL for sure but not quite sure for central IL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csnavywx Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 Also some significant changes with the northern stream system. Definitely more amplified, with more energy to the west, with less emphasis on the eastern portion of the system, which was part of the reason why the 18Z was so far east. Neutral going negative at 60 over W. Cen Texas. Pretty substantial change back. This thing is definitely coming northwest of the 18Z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 The 850 mb 0C literally does not move in IN between 60-66 hrs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moneyman Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 Chicago/STL/LAF will get smoked this run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OUWeatherFan Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 Another good run for Central Oklahoma. Very nice run so far! .50" for most of Central Oklahoma and even greater amounts to the East. This is going to continue to be a fun system to watch. Not a lot of models have posted tremendously high amounts of ice accumulation due to the arctic air intrusion speed, but I am curious if more will be picked up due to nice moisture transport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 Wow here it goes. Hr 66--positive feedback has begun. This NAM run will be intense. this thing is about to go BOOM...and in a big way it looks like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ottawa Blizzard Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 by 54, the heights in the eastern lakes are improved and more amplifcation out ahead of the trough vs the 18z GFS the positon of the base is a bit SE of the 18z GFS, so it may end up a wash defintely more amped than the 18z NAM though so is this god news or bad news? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prinsburg_wx Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 998 at 72 sw TN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csnavywx Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 Wow here it goes. Hr 66--positive feedback has begun. This NAM run will be intense. Wow, no kidding. That's pretty nuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyGreens Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 so is this god news or bad news? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kab2791 Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 DTW/LAF/ORD will get "destroyed" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L.B. LaForce Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 LOL at 18z GFS BUFKIT for KBTL: 27.8" (38.9") from Mon through wed. DGZ at least 300mb deep. Ummm.... !?!?!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 I can't look right now but how does DVN look for this run? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcwxguy Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 less qpf for my area, and much less for central nebraska Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 holy smokes.. and just getting going.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Organizing Low Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 h5 at 66 looks pretty ridic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BowMeHunter Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 I didn't realize how much porn 12z nam was until now.. wow what that would have been like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kab2791 Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 holy smokes.. Remember, we have a faster updating website: http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/NCOMAGWEB/appcontroller?prevPage=Model&MainPage=index&model=NAM&area=NAMER&areaDesc=North+America+-+US%2C+Canada%2C+and+northern+Mexico&page=Model&prevModel=NAM&prevArea=&currKey=region&prevKey=region&cat=MODEL+GUIDANCE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 This baroclinic zone is just absurd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moneyman Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 LAF just destroyed. My god. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prinsburg_wx Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 down to 992 at 78 n KY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Organizing Low Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 so is this god news or bad news? oh its very good except by the time it gets up here, we still need a little more help from the PV.....but so far so good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baroclinic_instability Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 Wow, no kidding. That's pretty nuts. Wow. Everything shifted N and the gradient in the cold air is stronger even with a weaker surface low. 994 vs 990 compared to the 18Z (at 78 hours on the 0Z)--but the intensity is unreal. That is blizzard on the NAM for parts of N IL and northern Indy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.