SnowGoose69 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 The NAM would seem at 72 hours to indicate the southern disturbance is not going to phase with the northern one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porsche Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 The NAM would seem at 72 hours to indicate the southern disturbance is not going to phase with the northern one. That is good isn't we don't want a phase correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 That is good isn't we don't want a phase correct? It is to an extent but the southern disturbance is so darn strong it raises heights big time along the east coast...NYC would likely be PL by 78-84 hours...again the NAM is often a bit warm at 850 at its range so it could be 2-3C too mild at 850. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Looks like .25-.50 QPF of snow or sleet with the 1st batch of overrunning. The 2nd part doesn't look good. It's really amplified in the midwest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundog Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 What direction is the movement of that precip shield? I'm on a phone I can't tell. Anything less than 90 degrees and Philly could be left out of part 1 completely. Not that it matters at this range and model though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpha5 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Take it FWIW but the NAM has an icy scenario for the NYC suburbs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Looks like .25-.50 QPF of snow or sleet with the 1st batch of overrunning. The 2nd part doesn't look good. It's really amplified in the midwest. Honestly, seeing the NAM only be that amplified at 84 hours is not that bad....the flow is still confluent over the eastern Lakes...that storm would begin cutting more ENE after 90 hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossi Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Take it FWIW but the NAM has an icy scenario for the NYC suburbs Actually for everyone form C. NJ on north -- Surface is very cold. Rossi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 It is to an extent but the southern disturbance is so darn strong it raises heights big time along the east coast...NYC would likely be PL by 78-84 hours...again the NAM is often a bit warm at 850 at its range so it could be 2-3C too mild at 850. I think it's sleet from 78-84 hours. The 850's are warm but the surface stays freezing throughout the 1st event. Here is the surface at 84 hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpha5 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Honestly, seeing the NAM only be that amplified at 84 hours is not that bad....the flow is still confluent over the eastern Lakes...that storm would begin cutting more ENE after 90 hours. I was thinking the same thing, with the PV still up in eastern Canada, and strong confluence over the Lakes and NNE, I'd expect the system to move more easterly afterwords..... Its not going to bull rush the PV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet-Phase Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 I noticed that the 2003 PDII was one of the analogs listed. The latest NAM reminds me of the 2 part system where the first one came through a couple of days before the main event. The strong banana-looking Highs look very simila ralong with the moisture source and where the battle lines are for this to be more easterly track. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 How you can get a 996mb low there with no phase with the southern stream system just amplifying on its own makes no sense....generally the only time you see surface lows that deep over AR are when you have closed lows at 500. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm At Sea Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 This thing could be heading to MI, sparing the heavy rain for I 95. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voyager Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 While I understand soundings to a degree, what does the area I pointed to imply. The column looks plenty saturated, but then the lines separate between 500 and 750 mb before coming back together. Does this indicate some sort of mid level drying? NAM looks like it beginning to show a significant SWFE long before the main low gets here (ala GFS?) a lot more moisture on the 12z run thus far. Whats a SWFE? Southwest flow event, or an overrunning event Interesting that the answers come quick when someone asks about a SWFE, but no one cares to answer my question about soundings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 This thing could be heading to MI, sparing the heavy rain for I 95. I would be fine with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikehobbyst Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Per the NAM it looks like 3-6 inches of moderate to heavy SN going to PL, the second batch looks to be .50-1.00 inch ice storm for NYC and LI. This would definately be a crippling and damaging event with ice for Tristate area. Surface stays in the upper 20's here with -40 temps in Quebec City. I am downright scared about this event on Long Island for severe and debilitating ice storm condition. This looks likely with 1994 upper air match almost perfectly. This will very likely happen. 1/1994 repeat almost exactly it is scary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpha5 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Interesting that the answers come quick when someone asks about a SWFE, but no one cares to answer my question about soundings. I dont know the answer to your question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 This thing could be heading to MI, sparing the heavy rain for I 95. I wish but I doubt it....the NAM being overamplified as always, and slow as always causes the confluence to die more over the NE so you get an extra west solution there...unfortunately a disaster rain track is still in the cards but I don't see anyway we get one far enough west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossi Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Per the NAM it looks like 3-6 inches of moderate to heavy SN going to PL, the second batch looks to be .50-1.00 inch ice storm for NYC and LI. This would definately be a crippling and damaging event with ice for Tristate area. Surface stays in the upper 20's here with -40 temps in Quebec City. I am downright scared about this event on Long Island for severe and debilitating ice storm condition. This looks likely with 1994 upper air match almost perfectly. This will very likely happen. 1/1994 repeat almost exactly it is scary. How do you come up with second part at 84 hours? Rossi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Here are the 12z Nam soundings for NYC. Surface never gets past 30.9. At hour 78, 850's warm up to 1.2 and at hour 84, they warm up to 3.4. Total QPF is 0.44. http://68.226.77.253/text/NAM80km/NAM_Knyc.txt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blizzardo Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 our last storm was suppose to be an icy mix until the models started to turn colder with snow... It's going to be mostly snow with maybe a little mix.. just like last time... The snow just keeps coming and coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiburon Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Soundings on the 12Z NAM for KNYC indicate a warm layer from 800-900 mb @ hr78, when 0.25" of QPF is falling, This is IP. By hr84, everything from 800 down to the surface is above freezing, with a surface temp around 29-30F, so that will be ZR (period QPF 0.05"). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm At Sea Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 The NAM is a non event for I 95 with some ice/snow for PA (but nothing too major). I think at this point this is a best case scenario. On the EC, we really don't want anything to do with this. This looks like good ole fashion Chicago snowstorm. Everything is way to pronounced to get too excited on the EC. The WAA is very substantial on this run. I say let them have their fun in the Midwest and let the pattern re-establish itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Soundings on the 12Z NAM for KNYC indicate a warm layer from 800-900 mb @ hr78, when 0.25" of QPF is falling, This is IP. By hr84, everything from 800 down to the surface is above freezing, with a surface temp around 29-30F, so that will be ZR (period QPF 0.05"). It is snow to sleet for NYC on the Nam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiburon Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 It is snow to sleet for NYC on the Nam. Station ID: KNYC Lat: 40.78 Long: -73.96 NAM Model Run: 12Z JAN 29, 2011 Forecast Hours: 0hr 6hr 12hr 18hr 24hr 30hr 36hr 42hr 48hr 54hr 60hr 66hr 72hr 78hr 84hr Sfc Prs(mb): 1007.7 1009.0 1008.2 1009.9 1012.0 1014.4 1017.4 1021.1 1023.8 1024.5 1024.5 1022.8 1020.5 1016.4 1015.3 Mean SLP (mb): 1013.7 1015.0 1014.2 1016.0 1018.2 1020.6 1023.5 1027.3 1030.1 1030.8 1030.8 1029.0 1026.6 1022.5 1021.4 2m agl Tmp (F): 22.1 31.6 29.3 28.1 24.9 30.0 27.1 19.4 15.4 24.8 23.3 25.0 27.4 30.9 30.1 2m agl Dewpt(F): 21.0 24.7 26.4 27.0 24.0 24.9 21.5 14.5 10.8 17.6 19.6 22.3 25.7 29.8 28.7 2m agl RH (%): 95 75 89 96 96 81 79 81 82 74 86 89 93 95 94 10m agl Dir: 293 277 218 21 325 295 306 326 357 20 85 97 74 87 51 10m agl Spd(kt): 6 6 3 1 5 8 8 7 7 3 3 7 11 9 10 6hr Precip (in): 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.25 0.05 AccumPrecip(in): 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.15 0.39 0.44 Sfc CAPE (J/kg): 0.5 0.0 19.9 0.0 0.0 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sfc CINH (J/kg): -1.4 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.8 -0.4 0.0 -1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 -2.7 -1.8 -0.9 0-3km Hel(J/kg): 174.9 114.1 152.1 131.5 166.9 127.7 93.5 172.7 200.2 181.9 195.9 350.7 691.3 707.4 362.5 Precip H20 (in): 0.21 0.29 0.33 0.30 0.28 0.26 0.20 0.17 0.19 0.26 0.34 0.55 0.67 0.75 0.74 Lifted Index(C): 14.9 14.9 14.0 15.6 14.5 14.6 16.0 16.4 20.0 19.5 17.5 13.9 11.0 6.7 5.5 700mb VV(-ub/s): -3.3 -1.4 5.0 -1.7 -0.6 -2.1 -1.8 -1.0 -1.2 -0.6 0.9 2.3 3.5 2.0 -0.3 Thk1000-500mb(m)5240.6 5259.9 5248.7 5287.8 5282.8 5265.8 5280.9 5280.1 5302.7 5318.2 5335.9 5353.4 5384.1 5421.6 5451.7 Thk1000-850mb(m)1273.0 1272.4 1270.4 1274.5 1269.3 1269.8 1266.8 1262.5 1260.8 1263.9 1268.5 1267.6 1282.7 1303.8 1313.1 Thk850-700mb(m):1481.2 1493.6 1488.4 1493.5 1500.1 1498.7 1508.8 1506.5 1511.3 1513.3 1520.6 1533.0 1539.5 1547.3 1555.1 SWEAT Index: 77.6 94.7 110.2 99.9 89.4 115.0 139.6 110.9 104.6 85.5 79.2 203.3 236.6 237.0 256.6 Total Totals Idx 34.1 31.0 34.6 32.2 34.0 32.8 26.4 20.5 13.8 15.2 24.1 33.4 37.8 43.9 45.0 Frz Hgt(ft amsl) 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 0WetBlbHgt(amsl) -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 6099 7000 Equil Prs (mb): 1008 1009 1008 1010 1012 1014 1017 1021 1024 1024 1025 1023 1021 1016 1015 Equil Hgt(amsl): 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 Hail Size(in): 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Conv Wind Gust: 8.8 10.2 11.4 10.8 11.0 12.4 14.0 12.1 11.0 9.4 8.8 10.4 12.0 47.1 43.8 Showalter Index: 15.5 16.1 15.3 16.3 15.2 15.6 16.6 16.7 19.8 19.5 18.0 14.7 11.6 6.7 5.1 Cap Strength(C):-999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 Storm Dir (deg): 318 303 302 311 313 311 318 318 321 305 295 284 275 276 282 Storm Spd (kts): 21 24 27 26 26 30 34 29 26 22 21 24 28 30 22 2m HeatIndex(F): 22 32 29 28 25 30 27 19 15 25 23 25 27 31 30 2m WindChill(F): 13 25 25 28 18 22 18 9 5 20 18 17 17 22 21 1000mb GPH (m): 108 119 112 125 142 161 184 211 229 237 238 225 208 177 168 1000mb Temp (C): -2.3 -0.8 -1.7 -2.3 -4.0 -2.2 -2.7 -6.6 -9.3 -6.2 -5.2 -5.1 -3.3 -0.7 -1.3 1000mb Dewpt(C): -5.8 -5.2 -3.5 -2.7 -4.6 -4.9 -6.6 -10.5 -12.8 -9.5 -8.0 -6.5 -3.9 -1.0 -1.6 1000mb RH (%): 77 72 87 97 96 81 75 74 76 78 81 90 96 98 98 1000mb Dir: 285 278 215 48 329 296 310 331 4 19 97 101 79 101 56 1000mb Speed(kt): 6 7 4 1 6 8 12 11 11 3 5 9 13 10 11 950mb GPH (m): 513 526 518 531 545 567 589 610 625 637 639 626 613 588 579 950mb Temp (C): -3.9 -3.9 -5.1 -4.5 -5.3 -5.2 -5.9 -9.0 -10.3 -8.9 -8.0 -7.7 -4.7 -0.5 0.6 950mb Dewpt(C): -8.8 -9.6 -6.5 -5.6 -7.1 -8.5 -8.6 -12.5 -16.2 -13.8 -12.3 -9.5 -4.9 -0.5 0.5 950mb RH (%): 69 65 90 92 87 78 81 76 62 68 72 87 98 99 99 950mb Dir: 318 288 221 249 338 307 315 330 0 330 137 132 119 160 169 950mb Speed(kt): 15 10 7 6 10 11 18 15 13 1 2 13 21 17 5 900mb GPH (m): 938 949 940 955 968 989 1009 1027 1043 1055 1059 1046 1039 1021 1016 900mb Temp (C): -6.7 -7.3 -7.9 -6.1 -7.7 -8.2 -9.4 -8.6 -6.8 -7.5 -6.5 -7.9 -4.0 0.9 4.1 900mb Dewpt(C): -10.3 -12.7 -9.1 -7.2 -9.5 -10.7 -13.4 -19.3 -22.7 -22.9 -17.6 -10.2 -4.2 0.9 3.6 900mb RH (%): 76 66 91 92 87 82 73 42 27 28 41 84 98 100 96 900mb Dir: 312 277 249 269 332 308 322 316 319 273 228 181 181 208 224 900mb Speed(kt): 12 12 10 12 10 14 22 15 11 6 5 13 26 32 27 850mb GPH (m): 1381 1391 1383 1400 1411 1431 1451 1473 1490 1501 1506 1492 1491 1481 1481 850mb Temp (C): -10.6 -10.1 -9.3 -8.7 -8.9 -9.7 -7.1 -5.7 -5.7 -5.9 -5.1 -5.1 -2.7 1.2 3.4 850mb Dewpt(C): -12.7 -15.8 -9.9 -10.1 -11.7 -14.0 -18.7 -25.4 -25.8 -25.0 -15.4 -5.2 -2.7 1.2 3.1 850mb RH (%): 85 63 95 90 81 71 40 20 19 21 44 99 100 100 98 850mb Dir: 276 274 260 284 281 291 302 291 298 277 238 229 223 232 233 850mb Speed(kt): 10 18 18 11 12 19 26 20 19 13 13 26 36 45 34 800mb GPH (m): 1844 1859 1851 1868 1880 1899 1924 1947 1964 1976 1983 1971 1973 1969 1972 800mb Temp (C): -13.3 -9.7 -10.2 -10.3 -9.1 -8.7 -6.7 -6.7 -6.1 -6.3 -4.7 -2.7 -1.6 -0.1 1.0 800mb Dewpt(C): -18.2 -18.3 -10.8 -12.9 -15.1 -17.5 -24.1 -29.0 -25.6 -23.3 -12.4 -2.7 -1.6 -0.6 0.5 800mb RH (%): 67 50 96 81 62 49 24 15 20 25 55 100 100 96 96 800mb Dir: 272 276 264 267 279 283 294 288 289 273 254 243 239 242 243 800mb Speed(kt): 15 27 25 12 20 29 33 26 26 22 21 36 46 50 29 Really? Snow at the outset--early, then the warm surge comes in and turns it to IP then ZR. Don't know how you look at that and see otherwise. IP is sleet, you know. Even the snow that falls will be wet junk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 Station ID: KNYC Lat: 40.78 Long: -73.96 NAM Model Run: 12Z JAN 29, 2011 Forecast Hours: 0hr 6hr 12hr 18hr 24hr 30hr 36hr 42hr 48hr 54hr 60hr 66hr 72hr 78hr 84hr Sfc Prs(mb): 1007.7 1009.0 1008.2 1009.9 1012.0 1014.4 1017.4 1021.1 1023.8 1024.5 1024.5 1022.8 1020.5 1016.4 1015.3 Mean SLP (mb): 1013.7 1015.0 1014.2 1016.0 1018.2 1020.6 1023.5 1027.3 1030.1 1030.8 1030.8 1029.0 1026.6 1022.5 1021.4 2m agl Tmp (F): 22.1 31.6 29.3 28.1 24.9 30.0 27.1 19.4 15.4 24.8 23.3 25.0 27.4 30.9 30.1 2m agl Dewpt(F): 21.0 24.7 26.4 27.0 24.0 24.9 21.5 14.5 10.8 17.6 19.6 22.3 25.7 29.8 28.7 2m agl RH (%): 95 75 89 96 96 81 79 81 82 74 86 89 93 95 94 10m agl Dir: 293 277 218 21 325 295 306 326 357 20 85 97 74 87 51 10m agl Spd(kt): 6 6 3 1 5 8 8 7 7 3 3 7 11 9 10 6hr Precip (in): 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.25 0.05 AccumPrecip(in): 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.15 0.39 0.44 Sfc CAPE (J/kg): 0.5 0.0 19.9 0.0 0.0 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sfc CINH (J/kg): -1.4 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.8 -0.4 0.0 -1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 -2.7 -1.8 -0.9 0-3km Hel(J/kg): 174.9 114.1 152.1 131.5 166.9 127.7 93.5 172.7 200.2 181.9 195.9 350.7 691.3 707.4 362.5 Precip H20 (in): 0.21 0.29 0.33 0.30 0.28 0.26 0.20 0.17 0.19 0.26 0.34 0.55 0.67 0.75 0.74 Lifted Index(C): 14.9 14.9 14.0 15.6 14.5 14.6 16.0 16.4 20.0 19.5 17.5 13.9 11.0 6.7 5.5 700mb VV(-ub/s): -3.3 -1.4 5.0 -1.7 -0.6 -2.1 -1.8 -1.0 -1.2 -0.6 0.9 2.3 3.5 2.0 -0.3 Thk1000-500mb(m)5240.6 5259.9 5248.7 5287.8 5282.8 5265.8 5280.9 5280.1 5302.7 5318.2 5335.9 5353.4 5384.1 5421.6 5451.7 Thk1000-850mb(m)1273.0 1272.4 1270.4 1274.5 1269.3 1269.8 1266.8 1262.5 1260.8 1263.9 1268.5 1267.6 1282.7 1303.8 1313.1 Thk850-700mb(m):1481.2 1493.6 1488.4 1493.5 1500.1 1498.7 1508.8 1506.5 1511.3 1513.3 1520.6 1533.0 1539.5 1547.3 1555.1 SWEAT Index: 77.6 94.7 110.2 99.9 89.4 115.0 139.6 110.9 104.6 85.5 79.2 203.3 236.6 237.0 256.6 Total Totals Idx 34.1 31.0 34.6 32.2 34.0 32.8 26.4 20.5 13.8 15.2 24.1 33.4 37.8 43.9 45.0 Frz Hgt(ft amsl) 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 0WetBlbHgt(amsl) -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 -1000 6099 7000 Equil Prs (mb): 1008 1009 1008 1010 1012 1014 1017 1021 1024 1024 1025 1023 1021 1016 1015 Equil Hgt(amsl): 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 Hail Size(in): 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Conv Wind Gust: 8.8 10.2 11.4 10.8 11.0 12.4 14.0 12.1 11.0 9.4 8.8 10.4 12.0 47.1 43.8 Showalter Index: 15.5 16.1 15.3 16.3 15.2 15.6 16.6 16.7 19.8 19.5 18.0 14.7 11.6 6.7 5.1 Cap Strength(C):-999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 -999.9 Storm Dir (deg): 318 303 302 311 313 311 318 318 321 305 295 284 275 276 282 Storm Spd (kts): 21 24 27 26 26 30 34 29 26 22 21 24 28 30 22 2m HeatIndex(F): 22 32 29 28 25 30 27 19 15 25 23 25 27 31 30 2m WindChill(F): 13 25 25 28 18 22 18 9 5 20 18 17 17 22 21 1000mb GPH (m): 108 119 112 125 142 161 184 211 229 237 238 225 208 177 168 1000mb Temp (C): -2.3 -0.8 -1.7 -2.3 -4.0 -2.2 -2.7 -6.6 -9.3 -6.2 -5.2 -5.1 -3.3 -0.7 -1.3 1000mb Dewpt(C): -5.8 -5.2 -3.5 -2.7 -4.6 -4.9 -6.6 -10.5 -12.8 -9.5 -8.0 -6.5 -3.9 -1.0 -1.6 1000mb RH (%): 77 72 87 97 96 81 75 74 76 78 81 90 96 98 98 1000mb Dir: 285 278 215 48 329 296 310 331 4 19 97 101 79 101 56 1000mb Speed(kt): 6 7 4 1 6 8 12 11 11 3 5 9 13 10 11 950mb GPH (m): 513 526 518 531 545 567 589 610 625 637 639 626 613 588 579 950mb Temp (C): -3.9 -3.9 -5.1 -4.5 -5.3 -5.2 -5.9 -9.0 -10.3 -8.9 -8.0 -7.7 -4.7 -0.5 0.6 950mb Dewpt(C): -8.8 -9.6 -6.5 -5.6 -7.1 -8.5 -8.6 -12.5 -16.2 -13.8 -12.3 -9.5 -4.9 -0.5 0.5 950mb RH (%): 69 65 90 92 87 78 81 76 62 68 72 87 98 99 99 950mb Dir: 318 288 221 249 338 307 315 330 0 330 137 132 119 160 169 950mb Speed(kt): 15 10 7 6 10 11 18 15 13 1 2 13 21 17 5 900mb GPH (m): 938 949 940 955 968 989 1009 1027 1043 1055 1059 1046 1039 1021 1016 900mb Temp (C): -6.7 -7.3 -7.9 -6.1 -7.7 -8.2 -9.4 -8.6 -6.8 -7.5 -6.5 -7.9 -4.0 0.9 4.1 900mb Dewpt(C): -10.3 -12.7 -9.1 -7.2 -9.5 -10.7 -13.4 -19.3 -22.7 -22.9 -17.6 -10.2 -4.2 0.9 3.6 900mb RH (%): 76 66 91 92 87 82 73 42 27 28 41 84 98 100 96 900mb Dir: 312 277 249 269 332 308 322 316 319 273 228 181 181 208 224 900mb Speed(kt): 12 12 10 12 10 14 22 15 11 6 5 13 26 32 27 850mb GPH (m): 1381 1391 1383 1400 1411 1431 1451 1473 1490 1501 1506 1492 1491 1481 1481 850mb Temp (C): -10.6 -10.1 -9.3 -8.7 -8.9 -9.7 -7.1 -5.7 -5.7 -5.9 -5.1 -5.1 -2.7 1.2 3.4 850mb Dewpt(C): -12.7 -15.8 -9.9 -10.1 -11.7 -14.0 -18.7 -25.4 -25.8 -25.0 -15.4 -5.2 -2.7 1.2 3.1 850mb RH (%): 85 63 95 90 81 71 40 20 19 21 44 99 100 100 98 850mb Dir: 276 274 260 284 281 291 302 291 298 277 238 229 223 232 233 850mb Speed(kt): 10 18 18 11 12 19 26 20 19 13 13 26 36 45 34 800mb GPH (m): 1844 1859 1851 1868 1880 1899 1924 1947 1964 1976 1983 1971 1973 1969 1972 800mb Temp (C): -13.3 -9.7 -10.2 -10.3 -9.1 -8.7 -6.7 -6.7 -6.1 -6.3 -4.7 -2.7 -1.6 -0.1 1.0 800mb Dewpt(C): -18.2 -18.3 -10.8 -12.9 -15.1 -17.5 -24.1 -29.0 -25.6 -23.3 -12.4 -2.7 -1.6 -0.6 0.5 800mb RH (%): 67 50 96 81 62 49 24 15 20 25 55 100 100 96 96 800mb Dir: 272 276 264 267 279 283 294 288 289 273 254 243 239 242 243 800mb Speed(kt): 15 27 25 12 20 29 33 26 26 22 21 36 46 50 29 Really? Snow at the outset--early, then the warm surge comes in and turns it to IP then ZR. Don't know how you look at that and see otherwise. NYC rarely sees freezing rain. This is the Nam, so I wouldn't take it seriously just yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 NYC rarely sees freezing rain. This is the Nam, so I wouldn't take it seriously just yet. I agree, The NAM is way too mild at 72-84...as I said 2-3C, maybe more....I have never in my life seen NYC see anything but snow in that sort of synoptic setup, ever....certainly not freezing rain....its just hard with that sort of vortex and the S/W that far away too see temps warm that much....the key is the thickness being only 540-546....I've seen these setups before and usually you're snow to around a 543 thickness with sleet from 543 to as much as 550. http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/NARR/1994/us0211.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBG Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 NYC rarely sees freezing rain. This is the Nam, so I wouldn't take it seriously just yet. In December 1973 storm, Valentines Day 2007 storm? Well including IP, it happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 I agree, The NAM is way too mild at 72-84...as I said 2-3C, maybe more....I have never in my life seen NYC see anything but snow in that sort of synoptic setup, ever....certainly not freezing rain....its just hard with that sort of vortex and the S/W that far away too see temps warm that much....the key is the thickness being only 540-546....I've seen these setups before and usually you're snow to around a 543 thickness with sleet from 543 to as much as 550. I have seen freezing drizzle but not a long period of freezing rain. In December 1973 storm, Valentines Day 2007 storm? Well including IP, it happens. The area saw snow and sleet in the VD storm. The only difference between that storm and this storm coming up are the temps. The temps during that storm were really cold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiburon Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 In December 1973 storm, Valentines Day 2007 storm? Well including IP, it happens. The reason why NYC rarely sees ZR is because of their proximity to maritime air. Rarely does the layers 800-950mb warm above 0C while keeping the surface below. Usually a warm low level fetch warms the whole lower atmosphere and you see plain rain. It's either the "warm nose" @ 700-800mb that yields IP or it's just good old rain. And just to note, I wasn't arguing that we will see ZR--I was stating what the model indicated, irrespective of climo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.