Max Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 From 1:12 What does BOX map look like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 in ur fanny, chuck um high chuck um far chuck them in Phils eye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 I'm a bit concerned by the northern stream energy trying to kick this east, but the southern stream looks really juiced right now on the water vapor...line convection extending almost to the Bay of Campeche...so we'll see how those two battle it out. I wonder if it tries to hook back north once it gets near the BM. The 12z euro hinted at it and even the Canadian ensembles. It's like it wants to kicked ene because of the nrn stream kicker, but the srn disturbance is very strong and tries to tug this further west. I wasn't a fan of that nrn stream disturbance showing up more on the 12z run, but you can see how they are battling it out, because the southern s/w wants to curl heights back into a classic "S" shape pattern, but the northern disturbance tries to flatten it out. That is a crap load of convection in the GOM right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeus Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 What does BOX map look like? No map has been issued for that forecast area yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamrivers Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 What does BOX map look like? not out yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTWeatherFreak Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 What does BOX map look like? Not out yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 SREFs came nw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 no i don't think so. that post was misleading in that respect. they aren't frigid by any means just not nearly as warm as they have been the last 48 hours or so. Gotcha... thanks sleet cancel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 Kevin, The euro is not 1' to 2' of snow...the ratios with this aren't going to be that great...maybe 10:1...12:1 at best. Not getting 2' of snow with ratios that low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 SREF bumped NW with the 0.50" qpf by about 40-50 miles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rivers Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 From 1:12 I would like this alot .lets see 3 inches today 8 inches possible tomorrow another 3 inches possible sat = 14 inches in 5 days not bad at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 Kevin, The euro is not 1' to 2' of snow...the ratios with this aren't going to be that great...maybe 10:1...12:1 at best. Not getting 2' of snow with ratios that low. You wont have any idea what the ratios are unless you have a cross section of the Euro...you can't see omega. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 SREFs came nw. No surprise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 SREFs came nw. AMOUT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 SREF bumped NW with the 0.50" qpf by about 40-50 miles. Pretty decent bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 Kevin, The euro is not 1' to 2' of snow...the ratios with this aren't going to be that great...maybe 10:1...12:1 at best. Not getting 2' of snow with ratios that low. Yes it is...I was told that with the last storm too..By YOU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MainePhotog Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 SREF bumped NW with the 0.50" qpf by about 40-50 miles. WOW! Onto the NW trend? Will see with other runs if they do likewise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCloser24 Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 Will, do you think the SREFcoming NW is the start of a trend? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 You wont have any idea what the ratios are unless you have a cross section of the Euro...you can't see omega. I was using more of the NAM/GFS for the very reason you mentioned...I don't think the Euro would be anything ideally different than the two but maybe I'm wrong. Are you able to see omega or no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowMan Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 SREFs came nw. AWT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 Yes it is...I was told that with the last storm too..By YOU What last storm? This past one where we got mainly 4-7''? Ratios were like 15:1 or 17:1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 AMOUT Looks like 0.6" for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 What last storm? This past one where we got mainly 4-7''? Ratios were like 15:1 or 17:1. The 2 foot plus storm. Doesn't anyone remember the stellar wite up Will did about that storm? when you had the vort going under SNE in perfect position Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cpickett79 Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 it would appear HPC continues to cut back QPF .....esp. for MPM and petey http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/qpf/d12_fill.gif using weenie magnifying glasses....they have 1qpf from Blue hill to Blackstone to a touch S of Rev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 Looks like 0.6" for you. LOL..AMOUT = As Most Of us thought Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hooralph Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 Very much looking forward to the 18z NAM. Though I imagine many would not agree with me, I feel that the magnitude and direction of its adjustments from the 12z run will be a strong bellwether with regard to trends as we close in on a final solution this evening and early tomorrow. There was a discussion last night of the classic biases at 6z and 18z, where 6z is often a whiff and 18z produces the spectacular amped up QPF bomb. I would love to see the latter just to mess with everyone. A 2.5" bullseye over Mt. Tolland is what I am thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowlieSnowstormson Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 LOL..AMOUT = As Most Of us thought Who uses AMOUT? Really... lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leesun Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 The SREF's are not a trend IMO. It is just correcting toward the E/UKIE/GGEM models Will, do you think the SREFcoming NW is the start of a trend? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalcottWx Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 Lets see those SREF images, boys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BostonWX Posted January 25, 2011 Share Posted January 25, 2011 This is what I'm thinking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.