Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Central PA Late January Thread Part II


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

CTP does really paint a nuisance minor event. Boy just their wording in this discussion...it is oh, ok no big deal just a slop mess. Interesting...

.SHORT TERM /6 AM WEDNESDAY MORNING THROUGH WEDNESDAY NIGHT/...

MODELS CONVERGING ON A SOLUTION SOMEWHERE BETWEEN THE NAM AND

ECMWF SOLUTIONS...WHICH ENDS UP LOOKING MUCH LIKE THE 12Z

OPERATIONAL RUN OF THE GFS. THIS IS ALL VERY CONSISTENT WITH THE

FORECAST/NUMBERS WE HAVE BEEN ISSUING FOR A FEW DAYS. ADVY AND

WATCH FLAGS HAVE BEEN HOISTED FOR THE SRN THIRD OF THE AREA. THE

LOW CENTER APPEARS TO BE ON A TRACK OFF THE COAST. 8H TEMPS JUST

APPCH 0C...BUT OTHER THICKNESS MEASURES AS WELL AS THE SFC TEMPS

INDICATE THAT THIS WILL BE A WET SNOW. SNOW COULD MIX WITH RAIN IN

THE FAR SE...AND THIS WOULD CUT THE SNOW ACCUMS DOWN FROM THE 8:1

RATIO WE ARE ALREADY EXPECTING THERE.

EVEN WHERE THE AIR WILL BE AT OR BELOW FREEZING...MORE OF THE

ACCUMS WILL BE ON THE SNOW COVER...AND MOST LIKELY LESS ON THE

BLACKTOP DUE TO IT/S LOW ALBEDO AND THE MAINLY-DAYLIGHT PERIOD OF

THE HEAVIEST SNOW/PRECIP. EVEN IN MID JANUARY...THE SUN HAS A

MINIMIZING EFFECT ON SNOW ACCUMS. THEREFORE HAVE PAINTED 10:1 OR

WETTER RATIOS. AS THE SUN SETS...THE BACK EDGE OF THE SYNOPTIC SNOW

WILL BE MOVING EAST OF THE LAURELS AND TOWARD THE SUSQ RIVER. AS

THE TEMPS GET COLDER...LESS OF A RAIN/SNOW MIX IS EXPECTED IN THE

LOWER SUSQ VALLEY. BUT...ACCUMS THERE SHOULD NOT BE MORE THAN AN

INCH OR TWO AFTER THEN. IT SHOULD BE ALL OVER BY MIDNIGHT OR 1 AM.

WINDS DO NOT GET STRONG SINCE THE LOW WILL NOT BE DEEPENING

RAPIDLY NEARBY. HOWEVER...AS THE STORM PULLS AWAY...THE POST-

FRONTAL FLOW WILL CREATE UPSLOPE SHSN IN THE WEST - AGAIN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CTP does really paint a nuisance minor event. Boy just their wording in this discussion...it is oh, ok no big deal just a slop mess. Interesting...

.SHORT TERM /6 AM WEDNESDAY MORNING THROUGH WEDNESDAY NIGHT/...

MODELS CONVERGING ON A SOLUTION SOMEWHERE BETWEEN THE NAM AND

ECMWF SOLUTIONS...WHICH ENDS UP LOOKING MUCH LIKE THE 12Z

OPERATIONAL RUN OF THE GFS. THIS IS ALL VERY CONSISTENT WITH THE

FORECAST/NUMBERS WE HAVE BEEN ISSUING FOR A FEW DAYS. ADVY AND

WATCH FLAGS HAVE BEEN HOISTED FOR THE SRN THIRD OF THE AREA. THE

LOW CENTER APPEARS TO BE ON A TRACK OFF THE COAST. 8H TEMPS JUST

APPCH 0C...BUT OTHER THICKNESS MEASURES AS WELL AS THE SFC TEMPS

INDICATE THAT THIS WILL BE A WET SNOW. SNOW COULD MIX WITH RAIN IN

THE FAR SE...AND THIS WOULD CUT THE SNOW ACCUMS DOWN FROM THE 8:1

RATIO WE ARE ALREADY EXPECTING THERE.

EVEN WHERE THE AIR WILL BE AT OR BELOW FREEZING...MORE OF THE

ACCUMS WILL BE ON THE SNOW COVER...AND MOST LIKELY LESS ON THE

BLACKTOP DUE TO IT/S LOW ALBEDO AND THE MAINLY-DAYLIGHT PERIOD OF

THE HEAVIEST SNOW/PRECIP. EVEN IN MID JANUARY...THE SUN HAS A

MINIMIZING EFFECT ON SNOW ACCUMS. THEREFORE HAVE PAINTED 10:1 OR

WETTER RATIOS. AS THE SUN SETS...THE BACK EDGE OF THE SYNOPTIC SNOW

WILL BE MOVING EAST OF THE LAURELS AND TOWARD THE SUSQ RIVER. AS

THE TEMPS GET COLDER...LESS OF A RAIN/SNOW MIX IS EXPECTED IN THE

LOWER SUSQ VALLEY. BUT...ACCUMS THERE SHOULD NOT BE MORE THAN AN

INCH OR TWO AFTER THEN. IT SHOULD BE ALL OVER BY MIDNIGHT OR 1 AM.

WINDS DO NOT GET STRONG SINCE THE LOW WILL NOT BE DEEPENING

RAPIDLY NEARBY. HOWEVER...AS THE STORM PULLS AWAY...THE POST-

FRONTAL FLOW WILL CREATE UPSLOPE SHSN IN THE WEST - AGAIN.

I got the impression the watches by the surrounding offices ''forced'' them to issue a WSW for Adams/York/Lancaster

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got the impression the watches by the surrounding offices ''forced'' them to issue a WSW for Adams/York/Lancaster

almost seems that way. They just appear to be so not interested that every model seems to be trending towards a stronger event and their timing to me is off. The main core of the snow will fall at night when it will be best for accumulations. I did agree with them issuing Advisory for us in MDT for now BUT thought there wording in their discussion would come across a bit more stronger to alert folks better of the potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That RGEM is indeed quite nice, and very similar to the Euro's QPF placement. However, judging by the reaction from seeing it I"m assuming you folks are taking that QPF scale in American units. Since the RGEM is Canadian, and that map's not from Ewall.. the units on that scale are in MM and approx 25 millimeters is about an inch of QPF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...