Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

MW/Lakes/OV November 2010 general disco


Hoosier

Recommended Posts

My god, after 2 early season storms that in an La Nina are climatologically favored to track over MN/WI everyone's calling for a 98/99 winter and adjusting their forecasts. :arrowhead::weenie:

For the 100th time, it's only November. Our region (that is, Great Lakes/Ohio Valley) normally doesn't flip over in an La Nina until mid December. Even last season, the first two storms of the seasons tracked through the Northern Plains/Upper Midwest (and we know how that winter played out in the end).

Now when Detroit doesn't see its first winter storm headline by January and snowstormcanuck/Chicago WX don't see their first measurable snowfall by Janaury then it's time to worry.

Yeah my mention of 98-99 was a ruse as I don't think things will be that slow to occur.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 942
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Brown Christmas....lock it in... This storm looks to drop nothing here now... Doesn't even look that cold anymore.

No hot sector here.. .I've got mid 30s with freezing rain to the west.

Bus load of coeds in bikinis in your driveway on Xmas eve. Time to open the pool back up (or put one up). grinch.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My god, after 2 early season storms that in an La Nina are climatologically favored to track over MN/WI everyone's calling for a 98/99 winter and adjusting their forecasts. :arrowhead::weenie:

For the 100th time, it's only November. Our region (that is, Great Lakes/Ohio Valley) normally doesn't flip over in an La Nina until mid December. Even last season, the first two storms of the seasons tracked through the Northern Plains/Upper Midwest (and we know how that winter played out in the end).

Now when Detroit doesn't see its first winter storm headline by January and snowstormcanuck/Chicago WX don't see their first measurable snowfall by Janaury then it's time to worry.

Agree 100000%!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My god, after 2 early season storms that in an La Nina are climatologically favored to track over MN/WI everyone's calling for a 98/99 winter and adjusting their forecasts. :arrowhead::weenie:

For the 100th time, it's only November. Our region (that is, Great Lakes/Ohio Valley) normally doesn't flip over in an La Nina until mid December. Even last season, the first two storms of the seasons tracked through the Northern Plains/Upper Midwest (and we know how that winter played out in the end).

Now when Detroit doesn't see its first winter storm headline by January and snowstormcanuck/Chicago WX don't see their first measurable snowfall by Janaury then it's time to worry.

Eh, I think everyone was kidding around about a 98-99 repeat. Well everyone but cromartie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My god, after 2 early season storms that in an La Nina are climatologically favored to track over MN/WI everyone's calling for a 98/99 winter and adjusting their forecasts. :arrowhead::weenie:

For the 100th time, it's only November. Our region (that is, Great Lakes/Ohio Valley) normally doesn't flip over in an La Nina until mid December. Even last season, the first two storms of the seasons tracked through the Northern Plains/Upper Midwest (and we know how that winter played out in the end).

Now when Detroit doesn't see its first winter storm headline by January and snowstormcanuck/Chicago WX don't see their first measurable snowfall by Janaury then it's time to worry.

Actually, it's probably time to worry if Chicago doesn't get its first trace of snow by Dec. 5th or measurable by the 15th, as these are the latest dates on record for each.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, it's probably time to worry if Chicago doesn't get its first trace of snow by Dec. 5th or measurable by the 15th, as these are the latest dates on record for each.

Well there's even less of a correlation there (see the Midwest winter talk thread).

It would go against climo if my aforementioned areas didn't see what I stated before January.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How'd you guys do in 99-00? IIRC, everything that season resembled suppression city. In fact, in terms of synoptic pattern it kind of reminds me of 09-10, except with the ENSO reversed.

Slightly below normal snowfall at LAF. January was the best month with 13.9". Other than that...meh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How'd you guys do in 99-00? IIRC, everything that season resembled suppression city. In fact, in terms of synoptic pattern it kind of reminds me of 09-10, except with the ENSO reversed.

1999 did have that nice Christmas blizzard (IIRC).

Then again that might have been 2000 -2001.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1999 did have that nice Christmas blizzard (IIRC).

Then again that might have been 2000 -2001.

Dec 1999 was a wasteland for snow here. No Christmas blizzard. I gotta imagine it was similar in SE MI.

Dec 2000 was very good. There was a mid month blizzard (11th-12th) and a coupler of smaller storms leading up to Christmas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...