Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,630
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. comparing the two setups, this one is more favorable for a more potent storm. lower downstream heights in SE Canada help foster coastal redevelopment and a better thump
  2. comparing the two setups, this one is more favorable for front end snow for NYC. lower downstream heights in SE Canada help
  3. i mean yeah i get the skepticism but these probabilities are objectively ridiculous
  4. yeah, moves towards the typical KU pattern at that point
  5. ridiculous Arctic blocking on the GEFS
  6. why even bother talking about a potential pattern hiccup when this is on the horizon? lmao
  7. it looks temporary. not really worried about that
  8. luckily with this kind of thermal gradient you can get a significant event with like a 1015mb low
  9. also, big signal on the GEFS for the 12th
  10. the thing that's really wild about these runs is that they're prolific before the most favorable window, which is when the block rots. these runs have DC-NYC getting 1-2 feet through the 16th, which is when the block is still developing. the timeframe from the 16-23rd is when you'd expect to see the greatest shot at a true MECS so the fact that ensembles are showing 8-12" from NYC to DC without a well defined MECS signal is ridiculous
  11. the thing that's really wild about these runs is that they're prolific before the most favorable window, which is when the block rots. these runs have DC-NYC getting 1-2 feet through the 16th, which is when the block is still developing. the timeframe from the 16-23rd is when you'd expect to see the greatest shot at a true MECS so the fact that ensembles are showing 8-12" from NYC to DC without a well defined MECS signal is ridiculous
  12. IMO this is more of a bottom-up event... the 50mb impacts on the stratosphere are more important for influencing the troposphere most of the time anyway, and a significant disruption is likely. the SPV stuff is only serving to bolster the tropospheric processes that will occur over the next two weeks
  13. the stratospheric impacts are likely going to lead to more stable blocking, IMO. it's all part of a bigger picture
  14. this retrograding and decaying Scandi block along with the elongated TPV is often a precursor to some of our larger storms, historically. there are risks before this occurs, mainly around the 8th and 12th, but there's certainly a window for a more prototypical coastal storm between the 18-23rd
  15. this retrograding and decaying Scandi block along with the elongated TPV is often a precursor to some of our larger storms, historically. there are risks before this occurs, mainly around the 8th and 12th, but there's certainly a window for a more prototypical coastal storm between the 18-23rd
  16. this is also just ridiculous
  17. nothing is ever permanent in weather. always roll my eyes when i see stuff like that
  18. the 6th and 8th look like potential front end thumps. i doubt they’re all snow or anything like that but some here sneezing at the potential for 2-4” to mix to rain is laughable given how lame the last few years have been after the 10th things really open up. it’s also, you know, snowing this evening
×
×
  • Create New...