Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,630
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. ECMWF actually looks better in every way. more meridional NS energy and more progressive SS energy would be a phased bomb
  2. GEFS is about to go insane. better ridging out west leads to better angular momentum for the NS vort and phasing is more evident on the mean
  3. EPS made a significant jump towards a more amped solution. PNA ridging better, leading to more favorable momentum of the NS piece as well as a slower, deeper initial trough
  4. EPS made a significant jump towards a more amped solution. PNA ridging better, leading to more favorable momentum of the NS piece as well as a slower, deeper initial trough
  5. EPS made a significant jump towards a more amped solution. PNA ridging better, leading to more favorable momentum of the NS piece as well as a slower, deeper initial trough
  6. GEFS is generally a lot more favorable. better amplification of the PNA ridge allows for the downstream trough axis to shift W and dig
  7. GEFS is generally a lot more favorable. better amplification of the PNA ridge allows for the downstream trough axis to shift W
  8. GEFS is a lot better than 00z... better alignment and amplification of the PNA ridge and it results in a much deeper trough this will certainly result in a more favorable surface output
  9. GEFS is a lot better than 00z... better alignment and amplification of the PNA ridge and it results in a much deeper trough this will certainly result in a more favorable surface output
×
×
  • Create New...