brooklynwx99

yeah, that did not help. what was interesting was I remember the PNA ridge trending "better" as the event moved up, but the ULL deteriorated to the point that it didn't matter. just kinda became messy because of weird ULL stuff. they're finicky, always have been

I think part of it is that back in the 2000s and 2010s, most KU setups delivered (March 2018 is a great example), and now we're seeing some flies in the ointment. sure, some of those failure modes are popping up more and more because of CC, but I think we got a bit spoiled, so now a block pops up and everyone expects a KU (I am personally guilty of this and am trying to remove this bias) mid-Feb easily could have occurred, the ULL just became a bit sloppy and the system became more disorganized... it still delivered historic snow to VA beach, and there was also a once in a lifetime Gulf Coast storm

I don't think there's any legitimate way that the 2013-15 +PDO could be viewed as a "three year cycle" or whatever. there have been numerous instances of +PDO in -PDO cycles and vice versa since the 40s. it's nothing new. you can see the same thing in the late 50s, late 80s, and the mid-2000s. IMO it's just authors trying to rationalize typical variance as a broader consequence of climate change

the Southeast and southern MA is loving climate change right now

the heights over British Columbia are higher again

simple, the GFS is tallest with the ridge out west and allows the NS to have better momentum

the CMC and UKMET are also much better looking out west. I am definitely taking the GFS with a grain of salt but it's not that far off, and the PNA has been trending better for a while now

FWIW the CMC did make some nice shifts synoptically

the trend with the PNA over the last model cycle has been pretty nice. went from a trough to a full latitude ridge on the GEFS over BC

agreed, though the trend for more -NAO probably does limit the extent of the warmth

dude that was two weeks ago, damn

it's an operational model at 10 days out. it will do that, as will any other OP at this range

all ensembles maintain a signal for the 9-10th, just a matter of phasing. worth keeping an eye on

GEFS has quite a signal with lots of strong coastals

the transient 50/50 and -EPO do help this threat. the synoptics are there, it just needs to deliver with a phase

next shot at something more substantial is probably the 9-10th as the cutter drops the TPV down and a wave tries to amp into the colder airmass with the transient PNA spike. after that, it's likely curtains outside of NNE with some warm weather on the way

oh god please no

the AIFS humping is going to be unbearable for a while. past 5 days it isn't as good as any other model, really

he shits on every storm threat that has ever formed

i saw people even comparing this to Jan 2015. that was on a totally different level of fail. not even close

yeah, trust me, it was one of the more stunning model collapses in the last several years. absolutely sucked

yup, I will reassess in 2030 or so. the sample size is just too small and we could get blasted a few times to close the decade for all anyone knows. people also thought the massive WC ridges from 2013-15 were going to be the new norm. how laughable that seems now

i mean, it is, but 48 hours is a bit much. the models capitulated and it totally blew, but it was at 120-144 hours out. that happens. we're in agreement that it would be a different story if we were inside of three days god, i can't wait for an effective El Nino. hopefully next year

that's kinda silly. that attitude is borne out of frustration rather than anything scientific

yup, some people never understand that good patterns just increase the odds for snow, not guarantee it. we literally just saw that play out this week!