Jump to content

tim123

Members
  • Posts

    6,682
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by tim123

  1. Cant remember specific one but there has been times it's been a trend setter.
  2. That look is actually a decent outcome as long as primary doesn't get farther north than erie pa. Secondary low takes over with a inverted trough extending back into western ny. Seen it many times.
  3. And remember lake effect is very localized especially on nnw flow. Bads can be 1 or 2 miles wide.
  4. Lake enhanced is lake effect go across the lake and snowfall for a year is 40 to 50 a year. It's the effect the lake has. Go to buf roc it's more than doubled
  5. Last storm I buy cause buffalo got almost same report. 11 inches roughly. But rochester got 5 inches of lake effect day after. I got 6 or 7 in walworth
  6. Rochester and buffalo proper are secondary snowbelts.
  7. It's more spead out and not as intense for sure. As a general statement
  8. They measure much more often than most probally before compacting. Or wind issues
  9. I get what your saying delta. But rochester receives more snow annually than buffalo. But they just get bigger chunks at a time usually.
  10. Rochester has gotten big lake storms 12 to 18 inches.or more.
  11. Lake effect counts for roughly half not 10 20 percent for rochester. More like 40 50 percent
  12. Any way back to weather. The pattern sure looks better than it was showing a few days ago. Much more of a trough in north east. Some sneaky type systems could emerge.
  13. No the un climate scientist dont acknowledged the sun as main driver of climate. They completely discard it
  14. And having a bleeding heart isn't goin to change a thing. Doing the right thing and looking for better technology for energy and efficiency is.
×
×
  • Create New...