NorthArlington101

Sorry Rodgers.

ICON snows on Sunday

Steelers can't stop the run... pretty sad.

pretty interesting AIFS ens for Sunday-Monday imo. Way more interested than it ever was for Thursday. GEPS really liked it too

Folks can PM me if they really wanna know the server name and find it themselves - it’s a Discord server and the screenshot was shared by folks I don’t think are messing with me. Discord is much weenier than here imo so I’m surprised that’s where he’d opt to pop in but I believe he diversified into that space when Twitter flipped to X.

HM is honking late Jan / early Feb for the best chance as a KU since 2022. He's been quiet lately but has come back from the dead (seemingly) on one of his channels.

Ignoring the snow means for a moment and only looking at precip it's pretty clear we've got two shots for some limited moisture in the next seven days and then a "wet" period. Hard to say too much more.

It's solid but not nearly as spectacular. Still like seeing it out there.

A more optimistic takeaway would be a lot of opportunities from the medium range to the extended. 24th/26th/28th all close and still room for the 18th/19th.

I fully respect the synoptics and realize that they drive the surface, but IMO one of the big flags for this upcoming "fail" was the lack of snow on the ens means. Could be a blind squirrel finding a nut but even as we saw positive h5 shifts they stayed stubbornly uninterested. AIs never liked it either. Seeing the AI guidance and the snow means responding to this period adds to my interest.

All it took was the thread to be unpinned...

I'm a huge believer in Jan 23-Jan 28. Legit cold, OPs throwing out consistent hits (some historic) in the long range, great snow/precip means, etc. Don't see what isn't to like.

Time for a thread. Idk who wants to own this stinker, but it must be done. We’ve got other things to post here

This guy is smart. Good thing he’s all in on Jan 23-25.

I responded more aggressively than I wanted to but I think if you split the discussion into “pros” and “average joes” the discussion for the average joes will inevitably dry up. It doesn’t offer folks a chance to learn and improve. The mods would have to somehow decide how the “trusted non-Mets” can be verified. I don’t think it would work out and would be disappointed if it was implemented. Think giving folks flairs for being a meteorologist accomplishes what we need as far as filtering to our best and brightest.