-
Posts
4,884 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by MillvilleWx
-
Yeah. I actually don't know why it wanted to hold on to the primary for so long. It's even longer than the GFS. Maybe it has trust issues and doesn't want to let go of its spawn? You know how young and maturing kids like to cling to the parents
-
GFSv16 and NAM 12km look similar at 5H at hour 84 but worlds different at the surface. Then it gets really crazy from there with the handling of the primary and its obvious convective feedback errors with surface low placements on the coast. It was doing well until about 72, then it went haywire when looking at the Model Comparison trends on Pivotal. I'll chalk that run into the trash unless something remotely agrees with it.
-
I actually have to head to a chiropractor appointment, so hopefully one of the other mets can answer. I'll be back soon. Sorry for not being able to answer atm
-
This was EXACTLY what WPC mentioned in their Day 3-7 disco and why they were not using the GFS.
-
That run was so close to something bigger for part of the sub-forum. This storm has so much potential, but the question is how far north does the CCB core end up. GFS was very close to a banner event for everyone north of I-70.
-
The GFS took a small step toward the other models with regards to the 5H reflection, but it's still the most progressive and aggressive with the primary into OH. In fact, you can look at how it's struggling to pinpoint the surface reflection on the coast with the low parked over a broad area of convection in the Atlantic. It's way different than every model. It's not even in the same zip code as the GFSv16 either. It's either seeing something, or it's got some serious biases to shake. It was doing better up until the 5H depiction went into IL. Then it reverted back. Still a nice WAA push on Sunday, so I do like seeing that regardless of the outcome later on.
-
Thru Hr 57, the 5H shift is apparent from last nights 00z run. It is not as progressive and the vort is holding together over MO and not opening up as has been the case last several runs. It's taking another baby step to the rest of guidance. Still have to wait and see what it does once it reaches the OH Valley.
-
It's one of those times where I hope the NAM is on to the right idea for y'alls sake!
-
RGEM once again holding ground with the cold powder idea for the WAA snow on Sunday. Thermal profile is frigid through the whole front end, just like the NAM. Modest 850-700mb frontogen over NoVA and the 270 corridor.
-
WAA is a translation to greater moisture feed. When you have warmer, less dense air riding into colder airmasses, you get a period of ascent that generates precip once it enters the colder thermal profile. Snowfall is physical mechanism generated by cooled water and enhanced through ascent (lifting mechanisms). WAA over a cold environment will lead to enhanced areas of lift within the boundary layer responsible for a majority of crystal growth in snow. You might have seen the term "Frontogenesis or Frontogen" mentioned in the forum at times. Those are favored areas of lift within certain boundary layers in the atmosphere. WAA regimes are typically located within the 850mb to 600mb layer aloft, which is favored with moisture transport. The better the lift between certain temperature profiles tends to generate better snow crystal structure (Dendrites) that accumulate more efficiently and are lighter in nature due to less water vapor condensing to make the snowflake.
-
Man. I know it's the NAM, but that front end from the WAA is cold powder for a majority of the snowfall. The thermal profile is perfect and slowly starts to degrade at 850mb half way through. It would be beautiful
-
Right now a transfer is off the NC coast. I know its the NAM at range, but you can see it starting down near ILM on the final panel.
-
Yup! Retrograde at least but I don’t see the full capture to induce a stall. However, could very well be a crawler for several hours with a N or NNW trajectory. This almost reminds me of 2006 vibes with regards to the 5H low as the low kind of waited for the ULL pivot through VA before finally kicking out of here. It has that potential and that was special for many. Note to readers: I am NOT saying this is 2006 by any means. Different synoptic pattern. Just the ULL progression and waiting aspect .
-
Yeah, but wait till you get my bill
-
Have we ever thought of bargaining with sushi and bulgogi to please the models? Even if it doesn't work, that sounds absolutely phenomenal right now, and now I want Asian food. Damnit
-
You should enjoy the WAA stuff no question. You and @Disc will be getting pounded by aggregates most likely Saturday night into early Sunday. You want the primary to stay near IN. That's the sweet spot
-
For sure. I'm always a take the easy road if possible for these setups. Experienced too many failures while my friends in PA/NJ/NY/MA talk about how awesome the storm was and posting on SM. Plus, whatever falls will stick instantly on Sunday. Plenty cold
-
One of the trends I like seeing is the increased favorability of the front end working out to at least advisory criteria with warning criteria not too far off for areas north of I-70 and west of US15. Here's a trend of the Prob 24 Snow >3" on the GEFS from 06z Sun to 06z Mon
-
Miller B life is not the life for the Mid Atlantic unfortunately. Even the 2nd bomb in 2010 was an inside 72 hour move to something remotely favorable. Then as the rest of that season went, it turned into a doozy for us. That's rare. That's also why I'm hesitant but cautiously optimistic for the coastal, but more rooting for the WAA piece so people can cash before any potential flop.
-
1. A primary that holds its strength too long with a venture to the eastern OH/western PA area would favor a torch at the mid-levels and likely have the ULL pass too far to the north leaving the area blank with any round 2 potential. 2. A late transfer where 40N becomes a more prime location compared to our sub-forum. This is probably the biggest worry of them all. 3. I wouldn't worry about a kick in this situation given the positioning of the NS vort 4. A weak UL or late developing ULL will shift focus to the NE with the surface low redevelopment too weak and far north to matter. In order of "worry" for the area, I'd favor the order of: 2, then 1, then 4
-
Not intentionally. Brownies otoh......
-
I'm a hugger, but I'm 1900 miles away
-
Cookies are great to eat at any meal?
-
Snowstorm solstice. Just wait till Groundhog Day. He'll see his shadow, which means 6 more weeks of Ji