Jump to content

stormtracker

Administrators
  • Posts

    62,437
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by stormtracker

  1. Yeah, not sure why people are analyzing a weather model on a weather board.
  2. Pay no attention to that. People weenie me for saying "guys" this morning and I was right. Not sure why people are afraid to X or weenie me, lol. That admin tag don't mean shit
  3. Actually a good bit drier, EDIT..for DC S and E. I don't have the accumulation maps, so well see
  4. Try I-95 from Emporia to South of the Border. I kinda wanna wreck on purpose every time I go down to see my mom.
  5. I’m on a phone so I could be totally wrong. I think we all can agree, NAM doesn’t mean shit.
  6. Why not? We’re on a weather board and we love new data. I’m not saying take it seriously at all. No harm in looking for trends or using it as an assist. We all know the NAM is a unserious JV model, especially at this range.
  7. Correct. I look because there’s nothing else. And we all love data. I’ve seen it change incrementally toward one way or the other plenty of times as it got closer in.
  8. Look at 84 nam vs 90 GFS. Trof position and sharpness not alike to me.
  9. I think it is. Trof isn’t as sharp and not oriented like the GFS
  10. And now compared to 6z, either it's slower or it just degraded a bit with the trof...more pos tilt than neutral
  11. Slightly better in that the trof s/w is wester than 6z. But that's about it so far
  12. Well let me rephrase. Some light light stuff at 75, but nothing like GFS
×
×
  • Create New...