GaWx

The 18Z Euro AI is similarly quite suppressed to the 12Z.

18Z GFS:

It did very well for the early Jan 2018 historic coastal SE winter storm. I remember it clearly as I was following it extra closely for obvious reasons. It was the first global to move the offshore low NNE instead of NE, which resulted in much higher qpf on the coast and that verified. So, this was at least an exception.

18Z Icon 120 850 0C line further SE than 12Z Icon 126 in NC/NW SC/N GA (toward the 12Z Euro AI):

12Z Euro AI way colder/further SE 850 0C line than other models (hour 126, which is as of 18Z on Feb 19th): Fayetteville to Gainesville: 12Z Euro op: N of RDU to TN 12Z GFS: S VA to TN 12Z CMC: S VA to TN 12Z Icon: S VA to TN

0Z GEFS (see below) and other models remain insistent on a rare sub -5 AO tomorrow. Today’s preliminary is already down to -4.8. There have been only 12 such periods since 1950 (average of once every 6 years). In Feb, itself, there’s only been 4 periods of sub -5 (one every 15 Febs on average): -2/10-11/2021 (only La Niña Feb instance): major GSO icestorm 2 days later -2/6-7, 14/2010 (El Nino): 2 SE US winter storms (2/5, 2/12-13) -2/5-6/1978 (El Nino): several SE light snows 2/2-9 -2/13-16/1969 (El Nino): major winter storm 2/15-17 Charlotte to Asheville to GSP Today’s 0Z GEFS based AO forecast:

Yes, to be fair, those historic Euro AI snow maps were for when this week’s activity was 8-9 days out. Now we’re within 6 days. So, perhaps those too cold misses (including way too cold 850s) aren’t as relevant now. Also, I now realize that the S portion of StormVista snow maps have to be added to the non trusted snowfall map list. So, a portion (not all and probably not even most) of the overdoing of snow on the insane SV Euro AI maps may have been due to SV algos. But regardless, the 0C 850/snow line verified way too far S.

1) As just mentioned it had very heavy (historic in some cases) snow on several runs in a row very far to the south (as far S as NE GA, upstate SC) for earlier this week, for example. However, to be fair, those runs were further out than 5 days. 2) For the Jan 10-11 storm, it had warming S winds ahead of the N Gulf low on the backside of the high moving offshore and ahead of a Clipper. That hardly ever happens. It ended up dead wrong at the surface. 3) I’m not disputing what you’re saying, but I don’t know exactly what you’re referring to and what exactly the verification measures. It could have been an H5 verification for all I know. The main problems may lie underneath 500 mb. Do you have a link or can you post the graphics? 4) I’m not saying it couldn’t end up right with the very suppressed track. With the preceding -5 AO, it could occur despite La Niña. What I’m saying is I’m taking it with a huge grain while it is on its own. 5) Are you favoring this very suppressed track?

The Euro AI has not been good overall this winter imo as I just posted. It especially blew the most recent storm’s snowfall, way overdoing it with 850 0C line way too far south and thus having historic snow amounts way far south of the actual snow line (though Stormvista snow maps likely overdid the amounts somewhat). So, I’m taking this very SE suppressed 12Z Euro AI with a gigantic grain at this point:

This Stormvista 12Z EPS snow map is way overdone in some of the southern portion. Here’s the comparable WB 10:1 map:

And unlike some other snow maps, these WB 12Z Euro Kuchera maps look legit based on the 850 mb 0C line. There’s a short period of non-snow just N of the NC/VA border in your vicinity when 850s go >0C (centered on 6Z of Feb 20th), but otherwise it is snow.

12Z Euro ZR looks bad for many in NC, especially Triangle vicinity and S/SE of there: Low track 12Z Euro: Sleet:

12Z Euro Kuchera:

Looking at this more closely, this 12Z Pivotal UK map has 2.5” of snowfall at RDU. Based on 850s, RDU gets no snow, ~0.2” of qpf as sleet, and ~0.5” qpf as ZR. Based on that, that’s ~0.6” of sleet (and no snow) vs this Pivotal map’s 2.5”. The SE/S portions of Pivotal UK snow maps are often not a reliable indicator of what the UK is actually generating. Algorithm issue at Pivotal for the UK snowfall maps is the problem.

The SE portion of UK snowfall maps on Pivotal, just like the Icon snow maps on Tropical Tidbits, are beyond awful because they’re often way overdone. This map is likely counting much of the ZR as 10:1 snow.

I disagree. The Euro AI has been awful. For example, check out these insane snowfall amounts (and the model really had it as snow with 850s <0C):

0Z Euro: major snow far N GA/W NC/NC NC/VA and ice, ice, baby many of SE VA/NC big cities into N SC:

That would likely be the biggest winter storm in that area in La Niña in Feb since 1989.

Tony stuff: ZR:

0Z CMC: ice, ice, baby and Tony sleetstorm NC:

0Z CMC setting up to come in more suppressed/colder than 0Z GFS. Let’s see.

0Z GFS: Based on maps through hour 93, my guess is that this will unfortunately look more like the 12Z than the 18Z. We’ll see. I hope my guess is wrong. Edit: Indeed, I don’t think the 0Z GFS will be liked.

Way better run than yesterday’s 0Z, which had virtually no snow in NC/SC/GA but not nearly as good as 12Z especially in NW SC, N GA, and SW NC. So, an in betweener.

Thanks, Chuck. Why is there a discrepancy between your map and the CPC? The graph below shows all days within 1/15-2/11 to be either +PNA (1/15-17 and 2/6-11) or neutral (1/18-2/5). So, 9 days +PNA and 19 days neutral meaning a mean of weak +PNA.

Regardless of Mar, in the meantime some of the best climo of the winter is in the last half of Feb. We still have another 2 weeks before March. Granted, it isn’t normally as good when it is La Niña. El Niño has the best Feb climo as we know. However, the pattern is anything but Ninaish with the -5 AO about to hit along with a rising +PNA to a strong one (combo typically has lingering effects). Will there be a NW trend like is common and occurred for the 1/10-11 storm? Or will there not be one like was the case for the 1/21-2 storm? We’ll see! So far there’s no indication of an impending NW trend, which may be partially related to the rare very strong -AO.