GaWx

The week 3/4 outlook website has a great archive section. I just took a look at all winter week 3/4 outlooks since they started 2015-6. I can confirm that today’s, with all but the S 1/2 of FL in 60-70% BN chances, is easily THE coldest week 3/4 outlook for the SE as a whole for Jan on record! The 2nd coldest for Jan was issued for Jan 16-29, 2016: 1/16-29/2016 verified very well with the solid cold of 4-6 BN. Also, there was a major winter storm N GA/Carolinas. In addition, flurries fell as far S as Gainesville, FL. (I was there) @pcbjr Could the SE, including Deep South, have a similarly cold and wintry two week period to 1/16-29/2016? Based on today’s coldest week 3/4 forecast on record for Jan, the extended models, Dec cold/strong +PNA analogs, and a decent chance to have an MJO largely near or inside the circle starting on left side, I wouldn’t at all discount this possibility. Could this finally be when the widespread SE major winter storm drought ends?? Was this the coldest week 3/4 outlook on record for the SE for ALL met winter from an absolutes standpoint? There’s only one other that can compare, the one for 2/9-22/2019 (see below). But that one was for a period with avg normals ~3F warmer than those pertaining to today’s week 3/4 outlook. Thus, I’d say today’s is the coldest week 3/4 outlook for the SE on record in terms of implied absolutes being forecasted for all met. winter!

For 3-4 weeks out this is quite impressive, especially as regards the 3rd shade of blue, which means 60-70% chance to average BN for a 2 week long period in ~30% of the lower 48. It also has ~2/3 of the lower 48 with a 50%+ chance for BN. You don’t see all of this too often these days to say the least, especially from the fairly conservative NOAA:

The Euro Weeklies once again have a strong signal for cold 1/6-12, similar to yesterday. For the 1st time, there’s a tiny bit of the 3rd shade of cold near the OB of NC. If the strong signal persists, future runs should start showing more of this 3rd shade and possibly some of the 4th shade later on. This is getting pretty close to about as strong a signal in this warmer age one will see for a full week of cold 2.5 weeks out on a 100 member ensemble: H5 has an even slightly stronger BN signal with NYC now down even further to a very low 538 dm, which is a whopping 12 dm below the normal of 550! This 538 compares to these the last 8 days starting with yesterday: 539, 541, 543, 543, 545, 547, 547, and 548. So, as we’re getting closer, the signal is getting clearer/intensifying. This is an extremely strong signal for 2.5 weeks out keeping in mind it is the mean of a 100 member ensemble in a warming world:

Thanks. I was basing that post on these 3 end of run 2m temp anomalies, which are all significantly colder than prior runs. NG is paying attention and is up another 4% today.

12Z model consensus is overall colder late in the runs and is just plain cold! Folks reading many posts in this thread might not realize this.

Latest bc MJO of two least inaccurate models are now very close with both into left side of circle early Jan. A good number of past instances of this sort of MJO during non-El Nino have been during cold in E US in Jan (see 7 cases below) GEFS: EPS: Past instances of left inside circle with cold E US in Jan non-El Nino: 2022 2nd half Jan: 2000 late Jan: 1999 early Jan: 1996 1st half Jan: 1994 1st half Jan: 1982 late Jan: 1976 early Jan: But this one failed to be cold: 2023 mid Jan was mild So, 7 were cold and only one wasn’t. But we may have the warm MC to contend with like for the 2023 case although the 2022 case was still cold. And we’ll have to see if the MJO really is going to verify left side inside circle/are these model progs accurate?

The multiday averaged CFS ensemble runs have been getting colder in the E US for much of early to mid Jan with a stronger +PNA/-EPO. Most recent individual CFS ensemble runs have had 2-3 weeks straight of BN temp domination in the E US. Euro Weeklies and extended GEFS from yesterday at 0Z agree. Let’s see how this evolves. Will be interesting. NG prices are at new 2024 highs. Newest run for Jan 3-9 (last 3 days of ens runs averaged): Run from one week ago for same period:

Strongest cold signal yet with NYC H5 for 1/6-12 down from 541 dm to 539 dm, which is 11 dm BN! That’s now within the 5th shade of blue vs 4th yest and 3rd on prior days. I don’t know if you folks realize how hard that is to do 2.5 weeks out for a full 7 day period on a 100 member ensemble in a warming world! The 2m temps are now the coldest in terms of how widespread they are. They’re still at the 2nd level of BN but I fully expect to start seeing the 3rd level soon assuming the strong signal continues undiminished.

Yesterday’s Euro Weeklies: Today’s Euro Weeklies: What does this change from yesterday’s run mean?

Latest MJO forecasts from the two best bc: closer together than yesterday as GEFS much closer to circle GEFS bc: EPS bc: colder potential but only if assuming MC convection doesn’t dominate as @bluewaveand my Maxar contact both warn:

The extended GEFS have on a good number of runs been suggesting 4-5 Canadian highs plunging down during ~1/3-18 thanks to a dominating W ridge/E trough. The latest 100 member Euro Weeklies mean for Jan 6-12 had a 9 dm BN H5 height at NYC (541 dm vs normal of 550 dm). IF that were to be anywhere close to verifying, that would likely allow for quite a cold week…again IF.

But if we could get most of 1/6-17 dominated by BN, there’d still be a good chance for near normal overall even if the SE ridge were strong at the end. If this were to occur after a modestly BN Dec. I’d be quite content as I never had expected Dec-Jan to average near or slightly BN.

I’d like to at least get the one cold week consistently suggested by the Euro Weeklies (EW) (Jan 6-12) for a good number of runs. And perhaps 7 or so days averaging modestly BN during ~7 days surrounding that week also sometimes suggested by the EW and extended GEFS. As long as the other 2.5 weeks aren’t too torchy, I’d be content.

Somebody in disagreement with what DT responded with this in the comments below: “Eastern based La Niña is better for cold and snow in the eastern U.S not a central based.”

DT says central Pacific La Niña is more favorable for E US cold and snow than is E Pacific La Niña. I’m confused @snowman19? Here him say this during very short portion at 5:08-5:30: