Jump to content

isohume

Meteorologist
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,545

  • Joined

About isohume

  • Birthday October 16

Profile Information

  • Four Letter Airport Code For Weather Obs (Such as KDCA)
    KGMU
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location:
    KWTF
  • Interests
    Drumming
    Working Out
    Biking
    Cooking
    Travel
    Starbucks
    Needless drama
    Sexual orientation of others

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. isohume
    Haha, I'm afraid that's the first thing you're going to get.
  2. isohume
    Evolve is the NWS's plan to ruin the NWS. Basically, they want us out of the grids/science and in with coddling core partners with face-time decision support (ie: hand-holding).
  3. isohume
    The AFD is kind of a dinosaur product. It was designed well before the internet and public access to coordinate thoughts and forecasts between the media, EMs, and surrounding WFOs. All the coordination is now done through AWIPS collaboration or NWSChat. The average public doesn't even know the AFD exists nor has a need for it. I imagine with "Evolve", the AFD will go away within the next 5-10 years.
  4. isohume
    Lol, deal!! Its been a three-ring circus at the office and it wont get better. The phone traffic alone is dizzying.
  5. isohume
    Each forecaster has their own take on what's working better, but yeah the EC will be given good weight I imagine.
  6. isohume
    It will likely be included in the next few fcsts if it looks to trend right. Its not always on to something.
  7. isohume
    The EC was used and weighted along with some GFS/CMC fields. The NAM profiles were not incorporated as it was deemed too warm at h85 and was an outlier, but will be watched for further trends. In my personal experience the NAM normally does quite well with the warm nose in this area.
  8. isohume
    Yeah the probabilistic scheme needs some work. Basically it starts with WPC's gaussian which is fitted to our own normalized fcst curve. The outputted range bins are problematic. If any part of a zone is say above 12 inches, it puts that whole area in a 12-18 inch bin.
  9. isohume
    Aww, I think it looks rather pretty. Unfortunately it's part of WPC's suite of probabilistic forecasting, which only goes out 72 hrs. It's automated and we can't touch it or delete it. I'd say it needs some tweaking.
  10. isohume
    In general all models suck. Some mostly suck tho.
  11. isohume
    The GFSux.
  12. isohume
    Oh, that GSP. Sry, carry on.
  13. isohume
    Uh, new fcst isn't out yet.
  14. isohume
    I noticed that too. Upper level div is strong, but cross sections show no deep omega coupling with meager llvl forcing.
  15. isohume
    isohume changed their profile photo
  16. isohume
    Meh.
×
×
  • Create New...